12.07.2015 Views

Forecasting for the Love Boat: Royal Caribbean Cruises in 1998(

Forecasting for the Love Boat: Royal Caribbean Cruises in 1998(

Forecasting for the Love Boat: Royal Caribbean Cruises in 1998(

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENERALThe growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company's revenues dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last three fiscal years has primarily been a function of <strong>the</strong> expansion of its fleetcapacity and, additionally <strong>in</strong> <strong>1998</strong>, its ability to obta<strong>in</strong> significantly higher net yields than <strong>in</strong> previous years.Fixed costs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g depreciation, fuel, <strong>in</strong>surance and crew costs, represent more than one-third of <strong>the</strong> Company's operat<strong>in</strong>gexpenses and do not change significantly <strong>in</strong> relation to changes <strong>in</strong> passenger loads and aggregate passenger ticket revenue.The Company's cruise and tour operations experience vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of seasonality. The Company's revenue from <strong>the</strong> sale ofpassenger tickets <strong>for</strong> its cruise operations is moderately seasonal. Historically, demand <strong>for</strong> cruises has been greater dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>summer months. The Company's tour revenues are extremely seasonal with a majority of tour revenues generated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> latespr<strong>in</strong>g and summer months <strong>in</strong> conjunction with <strong>the</strong> Alaska cruise season.The year over year percentage <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> average passenger capacity <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company's cruise brands, exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impact of<strong>the</strong> acquisition and consolidation of Cunard and Seabourn, is expected to be 13.7% dur<strong>in</strong>g fiscal 1999 as compared to fiscal <strong>1998</strong>.This <strong>in</strong>crease is primarily a result of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>to service of Carnival's Elation <strong>in</strong> March <strong>1998</strong> and Paradise <strong>in</strong> lateNovember <strong>1998</strong>, <strong>the</strong> expected <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>to service of <strong>the</strong> Carnival Triumph <strong>in</strong> July 1999 and Holland America's Volendam<strong>in</strong> August 1999 and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>to service of W<strong>in</strong>dstar's W<strong>in</strong>d Surf <strong>in</strong> May <strong>1998</strong>. Includ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impact of Cunard andSeabourn, average passenger capacity is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease 18.5% <strong>in</strong> fiscal 1999 as compared to fiscal <strong>1998</strong>. The acquisitionand consolidation of Cunard and Seabourn is not expected to materially affect <strong>the</strong> Company's consolidated net <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 1999.The year over year percentage <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> average passenger capacity, exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impact of Cunard and Seabourn, result<strong>in</strong>gfrom <strong>the</strong> delivery of vessels currently under contract <strong>for</strong> construction <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> fiscal years 2000 and 2001 is expected toapproximate 12.9% and 11.9%, respectively. Includ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impact of Cunard and Seabourn, <strong>the</strong> year over year <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>average passenger capacity <strong>for</strong> fiscal 2000 and 2001 is expected to approximate 11.7% and 10.9%, respectively.In June 1997, <strong>the</strong> Company and Airtours, a publicly traded leisure travel company <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Company holds a 26% <strong>in</strong>terest,each acquired a 50% <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> Il Ponte, <strong>the</strong> parent company of Costa, an Italian cruise company. The Company records its<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> Airtours and Il Ponte us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> equity method of account<strong>in</strong>g and records its portion of Airtours' and Il Ponte'sconsolidated operat<strong>in</strong>g results on a two-month lag basis. Demand <strong>for</strong> Airtours' and Costa's products is seasonal due to <strong>the</strong> natureof <strong>the</strong> European leisure travel <strong>in</strong>dustry and European cruise season. Typically, Airtours' and Costa's quarters end<strong>in</strong>g June 30 andSeptember 30 experience higher demand, with demand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> quarter end<strong>in</strong>g September 30 be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> highest.Fiscal <strong>1998</strong> Compared To Fiscal 1997RevenuesThe <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> total revenues of $561.8 million, or 23.0%, was due primarily to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cruise revenues of $540.3 million,or 23.9%. Approximately $281.9 million of <strong>the</strong> cruise revenue <strong>in</strong>crease is due to <strong>the</strong> acquisition and consolidation of Cunard andSeabourn and $258.4 million is due to <strong>in</strong>creased cruise revenues from Carnival, Holland America and W<strong>in</strong>dstar. The <strong>in</strong>creasefrom Carnival, Holland America and W<strong>in</strong>dstar resulted from an <strong>in</strong>crease of approximately 7.0% <strong>in</strong> total revenue per passengercruise day and a 4.8% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> passenger capacity, offset slightly by a .6% decrease <strong>in</strong> occupancy rates. Total revenue perpassenger cruise day <strong>in</strong>creased primarily due to strong demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company's cruise brands and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of HollandAmerica's new Rotterdam VI <strong>in</strong> November 1997, which has obta<strong>in</strong>ed higher pric<strong>in</strong>g. Passenger capacity <strong>in</strong>creased due to <strong>the</strong>addition of new vessels discussed previously partially offset by <strong>the</strong> Ecstasy be<strong>in</strong>g out of service <strong>for</strong> two months dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>1998</strong> (seeNonoperat<strong>in</strong>g Income (Expense)). Tour revenues <strong>in</strong>creased $31.8 million, or 13.1% to $274.5 million <strong>in</strong> <strong>1998</strong> from $242.6million <strong>in</strong> 1997 due primarily to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of tours sold.Cost and ExpensesOperat<strong>in</strong>g expenses <strong>in</strong>creased $296.7 million, or 22.4%. Cruise operat<strong>in</strong>g costs <strong>in</strong>creased by $274.2 million, or 23.1% <strong>in</strong> <strong>1998</strong>.Approximately $177.5 million of <strong>the</strong> cruise operat<strong>in</strong>g costs <strong>in</strong>crease is due to <strong>the</strong> acquisition and consolidation of Cunard andSeabourn. Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Cunard and Seabourn, cruise operat<strong>in</strong>g costs as a percentage of cruise revenues were 50.9% and 52.5% <strong>in</strong><strong>1998</strong> and 1997, respectively. Cruise operat<strong>in</strong>g costs, exclud<strong>in</strong>g Cunard and Seabourn, <strong>in</strong>creased primarily as a result of <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>in</strong> passenger capacity and airfare costs, partially offset by lower fuel costs. Airfare costs <strong>in</strong>creased due to a higher rate per airpassenger as well as a higher percentage of passengers elect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Company's air program. Tour operat<strong>in</strong>g expenses <strong>in</strong>creased$32.8 million, or 17.2% primarily due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> tour volume and higher expenses <strong>in</strong>curred primarily as a result of<strong>in</strong>creased tour content.Sell<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses <strong>in</strong>creased $72.9 million, or 24.6%, of which $46.8 million, or 15.8%, was due to <strong>the</strong>acquisition and consolidation of Cunard and Seabourn. Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Cunard and Seabourn, sell<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses as apercentage of revenues were 11.8% and 12.1% <strong>in</strong> <strong>1998</strong> and 1997, respectively. Sell<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses, exclud<strong>in</strong>gCunard and Seabourn, <strong>in</strong>creased primarily as a result of <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g and payroll and related costs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!