12.07.2015 Views

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appendix fourAppendix four<strong>The</strong> opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> delay in taking forward the<strong>Campus</strong> scheme1 <strong>The</strong> opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> the failed project is likelyto be greater than the simple £14.9 million direct cost<strong>of</strong> the project itself. Delay is expensive when buildingcost inflation is running ahead <strong>of</strong> general inflation inthe economy. While it is difficult to be precise about thecosts <strong>of</strong> delay on a scheme which was never static, forillustration, had the project eventually gone ahead inMay 2005, in substantially the same form it had reached byOctober 2003, then that 17 month delay would have addedapproximately £103 million to the cost <strong>of</strong> construction(construction tender prices exceeding general inflation bysome 13 per cent during the period) (Figure 12). <strong>The</strong> cost<strong>of</strong> borrowing has the capacity to <strong>of</strong>fset the impact <strong>of</strong> capitalcost increases, if rates fall, or indeed add to the cost, ifrates rise, although the degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset /cost would not beknown until financial close.2 This amount is illustrative and is not a cash cost, as theeventual project configuration by May 2005 differed fromthat in October 2003, partly to accommodate affordabilityconcerns. However, it does demonstrate quite clearly howquickly costs would have risen in this case, at that time. Thisunderlines the importance <strong>of</strong> factoring likely cost increasesinto decisions on whether to proceed with a project whenthere have been material changes to the key factors thatdetermined its original viability.12Construction Costs Inflation between October 2003 and May 2005Cost, £ millions1000950MIPS900850RPI800750Oct2003Nov2003Dec2003Jan2004Feb2004Mar2004Apr2004May2004Jun2004Jul2004Source: Office <strong>of</strong> National Statistics, <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> documentationAug2004Sep2004Oct2004Nov2004Dec2004Jan2005Feb2005Mar2005Apr2005May2005NOTERPI is the all-items Retail Price Index and MIPS is the Median Index <strong>of</strong> Public Sector Building Tender Prices published by NHS Estates based on informationcompiled by the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trade and Industry.the <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> scheme 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!