Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

appendix oneAppendix oneChronology of the Paddington Health Campus scheme1998FebruaryThe Turnberg Report, which reviewed the widerLondon healthcare strategy, is published.SeptemberStrategic Outline Case drawn up by West LondonPartnership Forum and submitted to Department of Health.2000AprilWest London Partnership Forum creates PaddingtonBasin Project Board to develop OBC.JuneWest London Partnership Forum submits planningapplication for proposed Paddington Health Campusscheme to Westminster City Council.JulyKensington and Chelsea Health Authority launchconsultation on specialist services in west London.OctoberLondon Regional Office of NHS approved OutlineBusiness Case (estimated gross capital construction cost£300m), with caveats.NovemberConsultation on specialist services closed, one month afterthe approval of the Outline Business Case.First permanent project director for the scheme appointed.2001January/FebruaryObjections to the Paddington Health Campus schemeraised by three Community Health Councils and schemereferred to the Secretary of State for Health.MayRisk register drawn up by Ernst & Young.OctoberSecretary of State confirmed approval for PaddingtonHealth Campus scheme.2002MarchKensington, Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority,London Regional Office and West London PartnershipForum wound up under NHS reforms, to be replacedby North West London Strategic Health Authority andPrimary Care Trusts.MayJoint Project Board (JPB) established to replace ProjectBoard of former West London Partnership Forum tooversee Paddington Health Campus scheme.SeptemberFirst draft of clinical output specifications produced.Planned Campus of insufficient scale to accommodateproposed clinical activity.North West London Strategic Health Authority wrote toCampus partners stating that it should be ready for OJEUadvertising by 31 March 2003 and that there could be nofurther slippage.OctoberJoint Project Board considered 10 per cent increase incosts of Outline Business Case.The Project Director’s contract was terminated by mutualagreement. An interim Project Director was appointedimmediatly and a permanent replacement from April 2003.NovemberWestminster City Council planners advised that theCampus proposal exceeded the planning approval.Partnerships UK appointed as co-sponsor for procurementexpertise (with effect from 1 July 2002).DecemberCost estimate from Davis Langdon and Everest put capitalconstruction cost for scheme at £786 million.the Paddington Health Campus scheme 41
appendix one2003FebruaryWestminster City Council planning department requestthat the Campus partners withdraw their planningapplication for further consideration.MarchThe Campus partners identified the availability ofThe Point building as essential for the enabling anddecanting of the scheme.AprilCost estimate from Davis Langdon and Everest putcapital construction cost for scheme at £792 million.Affordability Gap £53 million.Westminster Primary Care Trust noted that no agreementhad been reached on service strategies so the clinicalcontent of the scheme remained unconfirmedMayNew scheme configuration means that new ImperialCollege building is no longer separate from hospitalbuildings so the College’s building was now within thescope of the proposed PFI scheme.JuneScheme was approved by the Strategic Health Authority,with Primary Care Trust support.AugustOBC for Enabling Case for the Paddington HealthCampus (procurement of the Point building on a longlease) was finalised.OctoberChief Secretary to Treasury requested new OBC andreview of scheme management before Enabling Casecould be considered.Risk register updated by Davis Langdon and Everest2003 (continued)NovemberFull Business Case for enabling works was approved byNorth West London Strategic Health Authority.Gateway review of Campus scheme.The Chief Executive of St Mary’s NHS Trust wrote tothe Chief Executive of the NHS regarding who was theAccountable Officer for the scheme.DecemberJoint Department of Health/HM Treasury/National AuditOffice Review Steering Group commenced review.2004FebruaryInterim findings of Joint Review reported orally to Campuspartners. Work on OBC immediately stopped, pendingdecision on whether to proceed with project.AprilCampus partners agree new affordability andspace constraints with commissioners, subjectto 24 assumptions.PDCL approached Campus partners identifying land onnorth of the Paddington Basin that scheme could use formore straightforward build. Campus partners receivedDepartmental consent to explore this opportunity.JuneJoint Project Board noted the advantages of usingnorth site and subsequently prepared the 2004 OutlineBusiness Case.42the Paddington Health Campus scheme
Page 1 and 2: department of healthThe Paddington
Page 3 and 4: DEPARTMENT of healthThe Paddington
Page 5: Part 3The Campus partners were unab
Page 8 and 9: summary8 While the Campus partners
Page 10 and 11: summary21 Ultimately, in addition t
Page 12 and 13: part onePart oneThere was a strong
Page 14 and 15: part oneThere were strong clinical
Page 16 and 17: part twoPart TwoThe way the Campus
Page 18 and 19: part two2.6 Securing planning permi
Page 20 and 21: part twoRisk management2.14 The NHS
Page 22 and 23: part two2.28 Public support for the
Page 24 and 25: part three3.1 The Royal Brompton an
Page 26 and 27: part three3.12 The PDCL negotiator
Page 28 and 29: part three3.24 All Campus partners
Page 30 and 31: part threeThe changing proposals fo
Page 32 and 33: part three6A comparison of capital
Page 34 and 35: part fourAccountability for the sch
Page 36 and 37: part four4.8 Some of the advice and
Page 38 and 39: part five5.1 Both NHS Trusts contin
Page 40 and 41: glossaryLondon Regional OfficeMemor
Page 44 and 45: appendix one2004 (continued)JulyChi
Page 46 and 47: appendix two7 It was the view of th
Page 48 and 49: appendix fourAppendix fourThe oppor
Page 50 and 51: appendix fiveDepartment of Health:

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?