12.07.2015 Views

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

part one<strong>The</strong>re were strong clinical driverssupporting the proposed <strong>Paddington</strong><strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong>1.2 <strong>The</strong> clinical case for the <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong>was based on a number <strong>of</strong> reviews into health provisionand specialised health services in London. In 1997 theTurnberg report set out a number <strong>of</strong> recommendations,all <strong>of</strong> which received Government acceptance, to definethe wider London healthcare strategy. <strong>The</strong> Turnberg reportargued for:nnnnna modernisation <strong>of</strong> London’s hospitals;integrated working both within the NHS and withother partners;alignment <strong>of</strong> specialist commissioning with Londonmedical school groupings;Imperial College being responsible for the academicfocus in north west London; anda more rational distribution <strong>of</strong> specialist services innorth west London.<strong>The</strong>se points were all cited in the 2000 OBC forthe <strong>Campus</strong>.1.3 Subsequent clinical reviews <strong>of</strong> specialistservices indicated:nnthe need for a single specialist paediatric centre, toreplace the then current services fragmented overfive sites (the Boyd Report 1998); andthe desirability <strong>of</strong> concentrating heart services ontwo sites in west London, rather than four as was thecase (the English Report 1998).<strong>The</strong> original vision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong>fully addressed the main objectives<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong> partners1.4 In October 2000, following on from a StrategicOutline Case prepared in 1998, the then London RegionalOffice <strong>of</strong> the NHS, acting under delegated authority fromthe <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, approved an OBC for the<strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> drawn up under the auspices<strong>of</strong> the West London Partnership Forum. Neither the<strong>Department</strong> nor HM Treasury played any rolein approving this business case. <strong>The</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> the2000 OBC was to address the recommendations made inthe Turnberg Report and subsequent specialist reviews andthe condition <strong>of</strong> the Trusts’ estates. <strong>The</strong> preferred optionwithin the OBC called for the:nnnrationalisation <strong>of</strong> specialist services (paediatric andheart and lung) centring on <strong>Paddington</strong>;redevelopment <strong>of</strong> St Mary’s Hospital; andinvestment in associated facilities byImperial College.1.5 <strong>The</strong> 2000 OBC had an estimated gross capitalcost <strong>of</strong> £300 million 5 and a completion date <strong>of</strong> 2006. Itinvolved separate hospitals for St Mary’s NHS Trust andRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust on the proposedhealth campus. A map <strong>of</strong> the then existing site is at Map Aand a map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong> vision is at Map B (see centrepage map section, page 28).5 <strong>The</strong> figure <strong>of</strong> £360 million usually associated with the 2000 OBC included capital expenditure on a number <strong>of</strong> other hospitals and equipment. <strong>The</strong> figure <strong>of</strong>£300 million is comparable in scope to the later scheme valuations used in this report.12<strong>The</strong> <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> scheme

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!