Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme
Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme
Department of Health: The Paddington Health Campus Scheme
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
part one<strong>The</strong>re were strong clinical driverssupporting the proposed <strong>Paddington</strong><strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong>1.2 <strong>The</strong> clinical case for the <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong>was based on a number <strong>of</strong> reviews into health provisionand specialised health services in London. In 1997 theTurnberg report set out a number <strong>of</strong> recommendations,all <strong>of</strong> which received Government acceptance, to definethe wider London healthcare strategy. <strong>The</strong> Turnberg reportargued for:nnnnna modernisation <strong>of</strong> London’s hospitals;integrated working both within the NHS and withother partners;alignment <strong>of</strong> specialist commissioning with Londonmedical school groupings;Imperial College being responsible for the academicfocus in north west London; anda more rational distribution <strong>of</strong> specialist services innorth west London.<strong>The</strong>se points were all cited in the 2000 OBC forthe <strong>Campus</strong>.1.3 Subsequent clinical reviews <strong>of</strong> specialistservices indicated:nnthe need for a single specialist paediatric centre, toreplace the then current services fragmented overfive sites (the Boyd Report 1998); andthe desirability <strong>of</strong> concentrating heart services ontwo sites in west London, rather than four as was thecase (the English Report 1998).<strong>The</strong> original vision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong>fully addressed the main objectives<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong> partners1.4 In October 2000, following on from a StrategicOutline Case prepared in 1998, the then London RegionalOffice <strong>of</strong> the NHS, acting under delegated authority fromthe <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, approved an OBC for the<strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> drawn up under the auspices<strong>of</strong> the West London Partnership Forum. Neither the<strong>Department</strong> nor HM Treasury played any rolein approving this business case. <strong>The</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> the2000 OBC was to address the recommendations made inthe Turnberg Report and subsequent specialist reviews andthe condition <strong>of</strong> the Trusts’ estates. <strong>The</strong> preferred optionwithin the OBC called for the:nnnrationalisation <strong>of</strong> specialist services (paediatric andheart and lung) centring on <strong>Paddington</strong>;redevelopment <strong>of</strong> St Mary’s Hospital; andinvestment in associated facilities byImperial College.1.5 <strong>The</strong> 2000 OBC had an estimated gross capitalcost <strong>of</strong> £300 million 5 and a completion date <strong>of</strong> 2006. Itinvolved separate hospitals for St Mary’s NHS Trust andRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust on the proposedhealth campus. A map <strong>of</strong> the then existing site is at Map Aand a map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Campus</strong> vision is at Map B (see centrepage map section, page 28).5 <strong>The</strong> figure <strong>of</strong> £360 million usually associated with the 2000 OBC included capital expenditure on a number <strong>of</strong> other hospitals and equipment. <strong>The</strong> figure <strong>of</strong>£300 million is comparable in scope to the later scheme valuations used in this report.12<strong>The</strong> <strong>Paddington</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Campus</strong> scheme