• Administrative• Social• Quality*• Sourcing and Procurement*Council on Sustainable Biomass Production (CSBP)This 22 member independent consortium includes a broad cross-section of major players in bioenergy production,biomass growers, energy producers, germplasm providers, academics, and the agricultural, forestry, and environmentalcommunities. 23 They have developed a statement of intent supporting the development of a nationalsustainability standard for biomass production and a draft set of sustainability standards. To quote directly:The CSBP Standard is designed to promote the production and conversion of biomass into bioenergy in a sustainablemanner. It will apply to biomass produced from non-food sources, including dedicated fuel crops, crop residues,purpose-grown wood, forestry residues, and native vegetation. The Standard addresses the full complementof sustainability issues, including climate change, biological diversity, water quality and quantity, soil quality, andsocio-economic well-being. 24The Draft Standard 25 (to be completed in 2010) covers the following nine areas, as well as an overview of BestManagement Practices.1. Soil – Biomass production shall maintain or improve soil quality by minimizing erosion, enhancing carbonsequestration, and promoting healthy biological systems and chemical and physical properties.2. Biological Diversity – Biomass production shall contribute to the conservation or enhancement of biologicaldiversity, in particular native plants and wildlife.3. Water – Biomass production shall maintain or improve the quality and quantity of surface water, groundwater,and aquatic ecosystems.4. Climate Change – Biomass production shall reduce GHG emissions as compared to fossil fuels. Emissionsshall be estimated via a consistent approach to life cycle assessment.5. Socio-Economic Well-Being – Biomass production shall take place within a framework that sustainablydistributes overall socio-economic opportunity for and among all stakeholders (including landowners,farm workers, suppliers, biorefiners, and local community), and ensures compliance with labor laws andhuman rights.6. Legality – Biomass production shall comply with applicable federal, provincial, state, and local laws, ordinances,and regulations.7. Transparency – Production of certified biomass shall be transparent.8. Continuous Improvement – Biomass production practices and outcomes shall continuously improvebased on the best available science.9. Integrated Resources Management Planning – Biomass production shall be based on an integratedresource management plan that shall be completed, monitored and updated to address objectives of theCSBP standard, appropriate to the scale and intensity of the operation.The outcome of the Council’s work, along with the SBA’s and PNBI emerging standards and guidelines, provideclear and workable sustainability criteria that all practitioners of biomass-to-energy and biochar producersshould be encouraged to adopt. These standards and guidelines will also form the basis for future certificationprograms that will help the producers and consumers ensure that environmental, social and economic issues areall being addressed in a healthy, sustainable manner.23 Council on Sustainable Biomass Production. http://www.csbp.org/24 Ibid.25 http://www.csbp.org/files/survey/CSBP_Draft_Standard.pdf50U.S.-Focused <strong>Biochar</strong> Report:Assessment of <strong>Biochar</strong>’s Benefits for the United States of America
<strong>Biochar</strong> GHG reduction accounting in:Potential <strong>Biochar</strong> Greenhouse Gas Reductionsronal Larson, PhDrongretlarson@comcast.netThe potential for <strong>Biochar</strong> to significantly contribute to U.S. climate mitigation effortsthrough atmospheric carbon dioxide reductions (CDR)5.1 SummaryThis section shows how 1 billion tonnes of carbon (1 gigatonne) in <strong>Biochar</strong> might be added every year to the soilin the United States while removing as much from the atmosphere - to the advantage of both. <strong>Biochar</strong>’s potentialbenefits for the United States in this Section’s topic area of greenhouse gas reductions are large in every sense ofthe Technology Assessment acronym “EPISTLE”; Economic, Political, Institutional, Societal, Legal, and Environmental.Interestingly, those benefits seem to grow monotonically. The greater the carbon dioxide sequestration,the greater will be the benefits. However, these benefits could be limited by two parameters; the upper boundon the total US land area and the expected annual productivity of that land. All countries face land availabilitylimits. However, the United States certainly has much available land that can be utilized for <strong>Biochar</strong> production.Many countries have a larger potential for increased biomass productivity – because they have better growthconditions for more months per year and because their soil has a greater potential for productivity improvement.But the US can produce much more biomass per unit land area than at present – and especially as <strong>Biochar</strong> is appliedto this country’s considerable available land.Using the “EPISTLE” framework to expand on the benefits of large scale <strong>Biochar</strong>:- Economic Benefits: Income will certainly rise in the forestry and agricultural sectors. Adding the energybenefits of <strong>Biochar</strong> as a new income stream will be hugely important in rural America. As <strong>Biochar</strong> productionincreases, so will this benefit.- Political Benefits: At the local producer level, <strong>Biochar</strong> could be even better received than wind or solar onvisual impact grounds. Nationally and internationally, politicians should find great benefit in having addressedPeak Oil, Job Creation, National Security and many other issues besides climate, without significantcost. Providing leadership on <strong>Biochar</strong> introduction should improve our international image.- Institutional Benefits: Mostly, the impacted institutions will be rural – which are some of the US institutionsmost in need of help. But all energy, climate, food, and forestry institutions will be impacted positively<strong>Biochar</strong> GHG reduction accounting in: Potential <strong>Biochar</strong> Greenhouse Gas Reductions51