12.07.2015 Views

The water footprint and virtual water exports of Spanish tomatoes

The water footprint and virtual water exports of Spanish tomatoes

The water footprint and virtual water exports of Spanish tomatoes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 THE WATER FOOTPRINT OF TOMATO PRODUCTIONthe European Union, being the UK, Germany <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>sthe main importers (MITYC, 2009). As an average, 93%<strong>of</strong> the <strong>virtual</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>exports</strong> correspond to the EU.<strong>The</strong> average <strong>water</strong> apparent productivity <strong>of</strong> the exportedproduction in the period was 8.8 €/m 3 . This productivity ishigher than the average WAP <strong>of</strong> 5 €/m 3 , <strong>and</strong> closer to 7.1€/m 3 <strong>of</strong> greenhouse production <strong>and</strong> to 7.2 €/m 3 correspondingto production using ground<strong>water</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se results are actuallyclosely related, since the main exporting provinces, Almería,Murcia <strong>and</strong> Las Palmas, have a production mainly undergreenhouses conditions, using ground<strong>water</strong> <strong>and</strong> in early <strong>and</strong>late season (MARM, 2010b; Suárez, 2002 García, 2009). Togetherthey represent more than 60% <strong>of</strong> the annual <strong>exports</strong>(MICYT, 2009).5. DISCUSSIONThis study provides a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the green, blue<strong>and</strong> grey <strong>water</strong> <strong>footprint</strong> <strong>of</strong> tomato production in Spain, bothin l/kg <strong>and</strong> hm 3 , for all the <strong>Spanish</strong> provinces during theperiod 1997-2008.<strong>The</strong> results obtained for the average green <strong>and</strong> blue <strong>water</strong><strong>footprint</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> l/kg were in the range <strong>of</strong> those fromother studies, whereas the values obtained for the averagegrey <strong>water</strong> <strong>footprint</strong> were much higher. For tomato productionin Spain, Chapagain <strong>and</strong> Orr (2009) obtained values <strong>of</strong>about 14, 60 <strong>and</strong> 7 l/kg for the green, blue <strong>and</strong> grey <strong>water</strong><strong>footprint</strong> respectively. In their study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>water</strong> <strong>footprint</strong><strong>of</strong> tomato production in Italy, Aldaya et al. (2010) calculatedvalues <strong>of</strong> 35, 60 <strong>and</strong> 19 l/kg for green, blue <strong>and</strong> grey <strong>water</strong><strong>footprint</strong> respectively. <strong>The</strong>se differences with the study <strong>of</strong>Chapagain <strong>and</strong> Orr may be related to the different datasources <strong>and</strong> assumptions made. We followed the Nitrogen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!