12.07.2015 Views

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The second level <strong>of</strong> experiment at which we can look at the ANOVA is the individual oligomericO ctylA βirepeatability amongst Octyl A samples run in different Polymer-Pair-runs . Foreach Polymer-Pair-run about 6 to 15 sample preparations are made from the same solution <strong>of</strong>each <strong>of</strong> the two polymers, silver and matrix. The average <strong>of</strong> each βifor each oligomer <strong>of</strong> theOctyl A is obtained. The sum <strong>of</strong> within variances <strong>of</strong> all the Polymer-Pair-run can then becompared to the variances between all Polymer-Pair-run used in the average βiused to certifythe sample. Assuming the oligomerβ are independent one would expect 5% <strong>of</strong> the computediF’s to be above F critical . Again <strong>of</strong>ten as many as 50% <strong>of</strong> the F’s were above F critical suggesting thatthere is a significant variation between each sample preparation.Two other methods were used to check the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the data. First, linearity <strong>of</strong>concentration versus signal intensity was found for all data sets. Second, all data sets had a few(at least two) sets <strong>of</strong> data points in which the concentration ratios <strong>of</strong> the two polymers wererepeated. In all these the noise within one repeat <strong>of</strong> five data sets was larger than therepeatability between the solutions made up the same—indicating the repeatability <strong>of</strong> our making<strong>of</strong> the solutions was excellent. This showed that the sample preparation method used within oneset <strong>of</strong> experiments was good.The data was analyzed in two additional ways to check for self-consistency. In the first, asingle peak was given a fixed value (the average value for that peak <strong>of</strong> all spectra) and the rest <strong>of</strong>the peaks the spectrum under consideration were scaled accordingly. This did not change theoverall distribution <strong>of</strong> values <strong>of</strong> the p-value computed indicating that spectrum-to-spectrumdifferences were a leading cause <strong>of</strong> type A uncertainty. In the second, four adjacent data pointsin a spectrum were summed to one reducing the number <strong>of</strong> points per peak from 64 points to 16points. Assuming the oligomer βiobtained with this course graining <strong>of</strong> the spectrum (orsmoothing <strong>of</strong> the spectrum) are independent one would expect 5% <strong>of</strong> the computed F’s to beabove F critical obtained for these data. Again <strong>of</strong>ten as many as 50% <strong>of</strong> the F’s were above F criticalsuggesting that there is a significant variation between each sample preparation.31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!