12.07.2015 Views

Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya ...

Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya ...

Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conservation outcomes are the full set <strong>of</strong> quantitative <strong>and</strong> justifiable conservation targets in ahotspot that need to be achieved in order to prevent biodiversity loss. These targets are definedat three levels: species (extinctions avoided), sites (areas protected) <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scapes (corridorscreated). As conservation in the field succeeds in achieving these targets, these targets becomedemonstrable results or outcomes. While CEPF cannot achieve all <strong>of</strong> the outcomes identified fora region on its own, the partnership is trying to ensure that its conservation investments areworking toward preventing biodiversity loss <strong>and</strong> that its success can be monitored <strong>and</strong>measured. CI’s Center for Applied Biodiversity Science (CABS) is facilitating the definition <strong>of</strong>conservation outcomes across the 25 global hotspots, representing the benchmarks against whichthe global conservation community can gauge the success <strong>of</strong> conservation measures.Overview <strong>of</strong> Conservation OutcomesConservation outcomes focus on biodiversity across a hierarchical continuum <strong>of</strong> ecologicalscales. This continuum can be condensed into the three levels: species, sites <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scapes. Thethree levels interlock geographically through the presence <strong>of</strong> species in sites <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> sites inl<strong>and</strong>scapes. They are also logically connected. If species are to be conserved, the sites on whichthey live must be protected <strong>and</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>scapes must continue to sustain the ecological serviceson which the sites <strong>and</strong> the species depend. At the l<strong>and</strong>scape level, conservation corridors (withinwhich sites are nested) can sometimes be defined <strong>and</strong> investments can be targeted at increasingthe amount <strong>of</strong> habitat with ecological <strong>and</strong> biodiversity value within these corridors. Giventhreats to biodiversity at each <strong>of</strong> the three levels, quantifiable targets for conservation can be setin terms <strong>of</strong> extinctions avoided, sites protected <strong>and</strong>, where appropriate, conservation corridorscreated or preserved. This can only be done when accurate <strong>and</strong> comprehensive data are availableon the distribution <strong>of</strong> threatened species across sites <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scapes.Defining conservation outcomes is therefore a bottom-up process through which species-leveltargets are defined first <strong>and</strong> based on the species information, site-level conservation targets areidentified. L<strong>and</strong>scape-level targets are delineated subsequently, if appropriate for the region. Theprocess requires knowledge on the conservation status <strong>of</strong> individual species. This informationhas been accumulating in the Red Lists <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species developed by IUCN <strong>and</strong> partners.The Red List is based on quantitative, globally applicable criteria under which the probability <strong>of</strong>extinction is estimated for each species. Species outcomes in the hotspot include those speciesthat are globally threatened (Vulnerable, Endangered <strong>and</strong> Critically Endangered) according toThe 2002 IUCN Red List <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species. Outcome definition is a fluid process <strong>and</strong>, asdata become available, species-level outcomes will be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to include other taxonomicgroups that previously had not been assessed, as well as restricted-range species. Avoidingextinctions means conserving globally threatened species to make sure that their Red List statusimproves or at least stabilizes. This in turn means that data are needed on population trends; formost <strong>of</strong> the threatened species, there are no such data.Recognizing that most species are best conserved through the protection <strong>of</strong> the sites in whichthey occur, site outcomes are defined for each target species. Site outcomes are focused onphysically <strong>and</strong>/or socioeconomically discrete areas <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> that harbour populations <strong>of</strong> at leastone globally threatened species. These sites need to be protected from ecological transformationto conserve the target species. Sites are scale-independent <strong>and</strong>, ideally, should be manageable assingle units.Corridor outcomes are focused on l<strong>and</strong>scapes that need to be conserved to allow the persistence<strong>of</strong> biodiversity over time. Species <strong>and</strong> site outcomes are nested within corridors. The goal <strong>of</strong>corridors is to preserve ecological <strong>and</strong> evolutionary processes, as well as enhance connectivitybetween important conservation sites by effectively increasing the amount <strong>of</strong> habitat withbiodiversity value near them. Unlike species <strong>and</strong> site outcomes, the criteria for determining17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!