12.07.2015 Views

Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber ...

Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber ...

Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGSTable-1: Demographics of subjects included instatistical analysis (n=97)Age (years)Mean ± SD 11.85 ± 2.58Range 8-17GenderMale 55 (57%)Female 42 (43%)Refraction Spherical equivalent in DioptersMean ± SD -0.25 ± 1.75Range +5 <strong>to</strong> -5StatisticsOne eye of each subject was randomly selectedfor statistical analysis. In case of left eye themirror image of the clock hours was used suchthat 3 O’clock was nasal for both right and lefteye. Univariate regression analysis was used <strong>to</strong>analyze effect of age, gender and refraction onRNFL thickness. Comparisons for various groupswere done by ANOVA F test. Unpaired studentst test was used for comparisons of variablesbetween genders and paired t test for comparisonbetween right and left eyes.ResultsDemographics: One hundred subjects wereincluded in the study. Of these 3 (3%) did notcooperate for the OCT scan. The remaining 97subjects were evaluated statistically. Afterrandom selection of one eye per subject 47 righteyes and 50 left eyes were statistically analyzed.The demographic characteristics of the subjectsare listed in Table 1. There was no statisticaldifference between male and female subject forage (P =0.5) and refraction (P= 0.39)Cooperation3 (3%) of the 100 subjects selected for the studydid not cooperate for the scan. In 3 subjects lackof cooperation permitted scan only in one eye. In21 (22%) of the 97 subjects included in thestatistical analysis, scan was possible withdifficulty, but 3 scans of good quality wereobtained. In 76 (78%) scans were possible withoutdifficulty. Chi square test of cooperation scoreshowed that the cooperation in males andfemales was not statistically different. (P = 0.21).Students t test showed that the score wasdependent on age (P=0.001)<strong>Retinal</strong> nerve <strong>Fiber</strong> Layer Thickness (RNFL)Mean Global RNFL thickness of all eyes (n=97)was 103.11 ± 9.72 µm (range 80.4-126.3) Theglobal RNFL thickness in right eyes (n=47) was103.4 ± 10.41 µm and 102.23 ± 9.06 µm in the lefteye (n=50). The difference was not statisticallysignificant (P =0.4).The RNFL was thickest superiorly, followed byinferior quadrant, thinner nasally and thinnest inthe temporal quadrant. (Table 2) The differencebetween the superior and the inferior quadrantwas statistically significant (P = 0.024).The SMAX mean for all eyes was 162.1 ± 17.9 µm(range 121-202 µm) and the Imax mean was 160 ±16.9 µm (range 121-201 µm).Regression AnalysisIn Univariate analysis, age did not have astatistically significant effect (P = 0.8, R2 =0.001)on the RNFL thickness.The effect of refraction on global RNFL wasstatistically significant (P = 0.017).DiscussionThe diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucomaprogression is relatively subjective, involving aset of characteristic optic nerve findings usuallyaccompanied by visual field changes.Assessment of optic nerve changes in glaucomaand optic neuropathies can be challenging inchildren, as visual field analysis is usuallyunreliable, time consuming and may require afamiliarization phase. The RNFL thickness isknown <strong>to</strong> decrease in various optic nervepathologies and can be potentially documentedearlier than achromatic standard perimetry.<strong>Optical</strong> coherence <strong>to</strong>mography (OCT), firstdescribed in 1991 by Huang et al, is a high-Table-2: Peripapillary RNFL thickness in µm in 4 quadrants for all ages (n=97)Superior Nasal Inferior TemporalMean ± SD 133.82 ± 17.9 83.5 ± 16.82 128.3 ± 15.43 67.98 ± 9.74Range 99-226 46-129 92-165 45-99SD= standard deviation of mean, each quadrant includes 3 clock hours

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!