increasingly heterogeneous population, particularly Asian immigration, which wasseen by some politicians as representing the threat of ‘foreign control’ (New Zeal<strong>and</strong>Parliament, 1996a: 10923).As detailed previously, by far the largest group of immigrants to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> in thepostwar years had been British. <strong>By</strong> the late 1980s, however, the Asian populationwas the fastest growing group of immigrants to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (Statistics NewZeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a: 10). Between 1991 <strong>and</strong> 1996, for instance, numbers from NortheastAsia increased threefold, ‘accounting for over half the increase in the total number ofoverseas born’ (Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a: 10). Over this period, there was alsoan increase in the number of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> residents born in Southeast Asia (anincrease of 29.2 percent) <strong>and</strong> Southern Asia (an increase of 53.3 percent) (StatisticsNew Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a). As a result of the increasing Asian population, antiAsiansentiments resurfaced revealing strongly entrenched racism (Bedford & Ho, 2008).For example, National Business Review polls conducted in 1992 revealed that overhalf the respondents believed there were too many Asian immigrants in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>(cited in Kelsey, 1997). The high rate of individuals who held antiAsian sentimentssuggests that the government, which had allowed these changes to take place, waslosing the trust of major sections of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> public.The rising popularity of the highly populist New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First Party (a minorpolitical party that became increasingly significant, due to electoral reform that isdiscussed below), led by Winston Peters, with its antiimmigration <strong>and</strong>antiestablishment policies further highlighted a declining public faith in the leadingorganisations of government (Pratt, 2007). New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First had chosen to be a keyplayer in the politicisation of immigration in the run up to the 1996 election (Trlin &Watts, 2004). Leading his party’s political campaign, Peters focused his attentionspecifically on Asian immigration with a series of speeches referring to the ‘Asianinvasion’ that had taken place in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, followed by a series of speechesentitled ‘Whose country is it anyway?’ (Mark, 2004: Headline). In the October 1996election, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First emerged as the third largest party, gaining support fromvoters who looked to populist leaders for salvation (Trlin & Watts, 2004) <strong>and</strong>indicative of the lack of trust citizens now had of the political establishment <strong>and</strong>organisations of government.34
Changes in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> mediaThe difficulties emerging in the 1990s were further highlighted by dramatic changesin the news media. Deregulation <strong>and</strong> technological change in the 1980s meant therewas a new commercial imperative. This had lasting consequences for thepresentation of news items on television. Like other Anglophone societies, there wasgrowing pressure to organise the television schedule into small saleable fragments,which meant news <strong>and</strong> current affairs items were condensed (Atkinson, 1994; Cook,2001). News items overall became shorter. Longer interviews were more likelylinked to ‘humaninterest’ stories, <strong>and</strong> fastpaced, often fragmented, news items weremore likely to be ‘hard news’ such as crime <strong>and</strong> criminal justice stories (Atkinson,1994). A New Zeal<strong>and</strong> study, conducted by Atkinson (1994), revealed that the lengthof news items for violent crime was one of the shortest on average in 1990 runningfor 58 seconds, while stories on politics averaged 118 seconds (Atkinson, 2002).This illustrates the lack of indepth research needed for crime <strong>and</strong> prison stories assensational headlines sufficed.<strong>Crime</strong> visibility further increased with the introduction of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s first paytelevision service in May 1990 (Sky Television Ltd, owned by Rupert Murdoch)(Sky Television, 2007). While terrestrial television offered only two state providedchannels in the early 1980s, suddenly, free to air networks had to compete with othertelevision broadcasters offering a much wider variety of channels. This,paradoxically, meant the choice in programme content diminished as crime newstook on a tabloid style format (McGregor, 1992). The consequences of this suddencompetition was that channels no longer provided members of the public with abalanced selection of content; instead, there was a further increase in exciting crimebasedprogrammes in the hope of gaining the widest possible audience. The increasein violent crime in the late 1980s from 833 per 100,000 of population in 1987 to 991in 1992 <strong>and</strong> 1,393 in 1995 further provided the mass media with reliable news storiesto gain public attention 15 . For example, Atkinson (2002) found that on New Zeal<strong>and</strong>television’s One Network News 13.8 percent of items in 1993 were crime <strong>and</strong> prison15The increase in recorded crime up until the 1990s can be attributed to changes in recordingpractices by the police, as well as fluctuations in economic cycles (for instance a study in Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>Wales found that economic lows <strong>and</strong> highs are associated with dishonesty <strong>and</strong> violent offencesrespectively), sociological factors such as unemployment, <strong>and</strong> demographic factors such as theincrease in the youth population (Triggs, 1997).35
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgementsWriting this thesis
- Page 5 and 6: ContentsAbstract ..................
- Page 7 and 8: IntroductionIn September 2007, New
- Page 9 and 10: Thereafter, the Labourled coaliti
- Page 11 and 12: Postwar Security and Penalwelfa
- Page 13 and 14: the exterior of electoral politics,
- Page 15 and 16: social conditions, towards that whi
- Page 17 and 18: penal policy development where they
- Page 19 and 20: implementation of this legislation.
- Page 21 and 22: increasingly aware of crime, gainin
- Page 23 and 24: immigration was considered a threat
- Page 25 and 26: in agricultural exports, particular
- Page 27 and 28: The time would seem to be appropria
- Page 29 and 30: In keeping crime out of the public
- Page 31 and 32: The Labour Party’s response to th
- Page 33: across a multitude of family househ
- Page 37 and 38: dominant feature of New Zealand soc
- Page 39 and 40: Despite its manifest contradictions
- Page 41 and 42: Governments and their civil servant
- Page 43 and 44: The Victims Task Force believed tha
- Page 45 and 46: eferendum into legislation, motivat
- Page 47 and 48: [New Zealand was] one of the safest
- Page 49 and 50: governments in the hope that ‘suc
- Page 51 and 52: McVicar paints of himself as the
- Page 53 and 54: that New Zealanders have been expos
- Page 55 and 56: This combination of circumstances c
- Page 57 and 58: Sympathy, empathy, commiseration an
- Page 59 and 60: [h]ad not risen from the ‘victims
- Page 61 and 62: illicit a response from the communi
- Page 63 and 64: Reform Bill). The Trust made submis
- Page 65 and 66: The willingness by Opposition MPs t
- Page 67 and 68: I remind [the National Party] that
- Page 69 and 70: However, the Labourled government
- Page 71 and 72: 6). While these opposing parties po
- Page 73 and 74: One development in particular incre
- Page 75 and 76: policymaking 32 . From 2000 to 2006
- Page 77 and 78: had removed suspended sentences as
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter Four:Resistance to Penal Po
- Page 81 and 82: 2004: 44). The situation worsened i
- Page 83 and 84: were designed to address New Zealan
- Page 85 and 86:
$3.341 million annually from 2009/2
- Page 87 and 88:
organisation, was interested in bur
- Page 89 and 90:
Because of the capability of the me
- Page 91 and 92:
The case of Graeme BurtonThe second
- Page 93 and 94:
‘parole should be a privilege, no
- Page 95 and 96:
given the difficulties in measureme
- Page 97 and 98:
package to prioritise this issue. H
- Page 99 and 100:
emained insecure and overtly puniti
- Page 101 and 102:
the end of its tenure. As a result,
- Page 103 and 104:
The thesis has explained and analys
- Page 105 and 106:
main determinants are addressed. As
- Page 107 and 108:
Atkinson, J. (2002). Structures of
- Page 109 and 110:
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008b
- Page 111 and 112:
Cullen, P., & Lloyd, C. (1991). Lob
- Page 113 and 114:
Department of Statistics (N.Z) (199
- Page 115 and 116:
Hall, G., & O'Driscoll, S. (2002).
- Page 117 and 118:
Johnson, R. J., & Ogloff, J. R. P.
- Page 119 and 120:
Maguire, M. (2002). Crime data and
- Page 121 and 122:
Ministry of Justice (2002a). Senten
- Page 123 and 124:
New Zealand Parliament (1993a). Cri
- Page 125 and 126:
asket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/searc
- Page 127 and 128:
O'Conner, D. (2006). Effective Inte
- Page 129 and 130:
Prisoners in line for waist restrai
- Page 131 and 132:
Sentencing Amendment Act. (2007). R
- Page 133 and 134:
http://www.stats.govt.nz/products
- Page 135 and 136:
contours of New Zealand (pp. 1111