12.07.2015 Views

By Tess Bartlett - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

By Tess Bartlett - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

By Tess Bartlett - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

increasingly heterogeneous population, particularly Asian immigration, which wasseen by some politicians as representing the threat of ‘foreign control’ (New Zeal<strong>and</strong>Parliament, 1996a: 10923).As detailed previously, by far the largest group of immigrants to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> in thepost­war years had been British. <strong>By</strong> the late 1980s, however, the Asian populationwas the fastest growing group of immigrants to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (Statistics NewZeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a: 10). Between 1991 <strong>and</strong> 1996, for instance, numbers from NortheastAsia increased threefold, ‘accounting for over half the increase in the total number ofoverseas born’ (Statistics New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a: 10). Over this period, there was alsoan increase in the number of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> residents born in Southeast Asia (anincrease of 29.2 percent) <strong>and</strong> Southern Asia (an increase of 53.3 percent) (StatisticsNew Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 1996a). As a result of the increasing Asian population, anti­Asiansentiments resurfaced revealing strongly entrenched racism (Bedford & Ho, 2008).For example, National Business Review polls conducted in 1992 revealed that overhalf the respondents believed there were too many Asian immigrants in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>(cited in Kelsey, 1997). The high rate of individuals who held anti­Asian sentimentssuggests that the government, which had allowed these changes to take place, waslosing the trust of major sections of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> public.The rising popularity of the highly populist New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First Party (a minorpolitical party that became increasingly significant, due to electoral reform that isdiscussed below), led by Winston Peters, with its anti­immigration <strong>and</strong>anti­establishment policies further highlighted a declining public faith in the leadingorganisations of government (Pratt, 2007). New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First had chosen to be a keyplayer in the politicisation of immigration in the run up to the 1996 election (Trlin &Watts, 2004). Leading his party’s political campaign, Peters focused his attentionspecifically on Asian immigration with a series of speeches referring to the ‘Asianinvasion’ that had taken place in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, followed by a series of speechesentitled ‘Whose country is it anyway?’ (Mark, 2004: Headline). In the October 1996election, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> First emerged as the third largest party, gaining support fromvoters who looked to populist leaders for salvation (Trlin & Watts, 2004) <strong>and</strong>indicative of the lack of trust citizens now had of the political establishment <strong>and</strong>organisations of government.34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!