By Tess Bartlett - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

New Zealand Parliament (2002b). Sentencing and Parole Bill: Third reading.Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (01 May). Retrieved 13 Mar, 2009, fromhttp://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d3=han/text/2002/05/01_057.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2002c). Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill: In committee.Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (17 Apr). Retrieved 03 Mar, 2009, fromhttp://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d12=han/text/2002/04/17_082.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2002d). Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill: Secondreading. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (28 Mar). Retrieved 17 Mar,fromhttp://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d1=han/text/2002/03/28_044.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2002e). Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill: SensibleSentencing Trust. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (16 Apr). Retrieved 28Apr, 2009, from http://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d1=han/text/2002/04/16_019.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2002f). Victims' Rights Bill: In committee. ParliamentaryDebates (Hansard). (08 Oct). Retrieved 05 Mar, 2009, fromhttp://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d8=han/text/2002/10/08_560.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2002g). Victims' Rights Bill: Third reading. ParliamentaryDebates (Hansard). (08 Oct). Retrieved 17 Mar, 2009, fromhttp://legislation.knowledgebasket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d1=han/text/2002/10/08_567.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2003). Criminal investigations (bodily samples)amendment bill Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (21 Oct). Retrieved 11Feb, 2009, from http://www.knowledge124
asket.co.nz.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/search/doc_view.php?d12=han2/text/2003/FINAL_2003_10_22/9445.htmlNew Zealand Parliament (2005a). Courts and criminal matters bill second reading,instruction to committee, in committee Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).(14 Jun). Retrieved 12 Mar, 2009, from http://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/6/3/4/47HansD_20050617_00000292CourtsandCriminalMattersBillSecond.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2005b). Estimates debate in committee. ParliamentaryDebates (Hansard). (26 Jul). Retrieved 30 Apr, 2009, fromhttp://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/2/c/b/47HansD_20050726_00000885EstimatesDebateInCommittee.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2005c). Prisoners' and Victims' Claims Bill incommittee, procedure, third reading. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (01Jun). Retrieved 17 Mar, 2009, from http://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/5/8/3/47HansD_20050602_00000001PrisonersandVictimsClaimsBillInCommittee.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2007a). Criminal Justice Reform Bill in committee.Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (19 July). Retrieved 31 Mar, 2009, fromhttp://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/c/5/7/48HansD_20070719_00000831CriminalJusticeReformBillInCommittee.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2007b). Criminal Justice Reform Bill second reading.Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (19 Jun). Retrieved 07 Apr, 2009, fromhttp://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/a/4/9/48HansD_20070619_00001152CriminalJusticeReformBillSecondReading.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2007c). Debate on Prime Minister's statement.Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). (13 Feb). Retrieved 04 May, 2009, fromhttp://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/Debates/Debates/3/0/f/48HansD_20070213_00000068DebateonPrimeMinistersStatement.htmNew Zealand Parliament (2007d). Estimates debate in committee. ParliamentaryDebates (Hansard). (17 Jul). Retrieved 30 Mar, 2009, from125
Page 3 and 4:
AcknowledgementsWriting this thesis
Page 5 and 6:
ContentsAbstract ..................
Page 7 and 8:
IntroductionIn September 2007, New
Page 9 and 10:
Thereafter, the Labourled coaliti
Page 11 and 12:
Postwar Security and Penalwelfa
Page 13 and 14:
the exterior of electoral politics,
Page 15 and 16:
social conditions, towards that whi
Page 17 and 18:
penal policy development where they
Page 19 and 20:
implementation of this legislation.
Page 21 and 22:
increasingly aware of crime, gainin
Page 23 and 24:
immigration was considered a threat
Page 25 and 26:
in agricultural exports, particular
Page 27 and 28:
The time would seem to be appropria
Page 29 and 30:
In keeping crime out of the public
Page 31 and 32:
The Labour Party’s response to th
Page 33 and 34:
across a multitude of family househ
Page 35 and 36:
Changes in New Zealand mediaThe dif
Page 37 and 38:
dominant feature of New Zealand soc
Page 39 and 40:
Despite its manifest contradictions
Page 41 and 42:
Governments and their civil servant
Page 43 and 44:
The Victims Task Force believed tha
Page 45 and 46:
eferendum into legislation, motivat
Page 47 and 48:
[New Zealand was] one of the safest
Page 49 and 50:
governments in the hope that ‘suc
Page 51 and 52:
McVicar paints of himself as the
Page 53 and 54:
that New Zealanders have been expos
Page 55 and 56:
This combination of circumstances c
Page 57 and 58:
Sympathy, empathy, commiseration an
Page 59 and 60:
[h]ad not risen from the ‘victims
Page 61 and 62:
illicit a response from the communi
Page 63 and 64:
Reform Bill). The Trust made submis
Page 65 and 66:
The willingness by Opposition MPs t
Page 67 and 68:
I remind [the National Party] that
Page 69 and 70:
However, the Labourled government
Page 71 and 72:
6). While these opposing parties po
Page 73 and 74: One development in particular incre
Page 75 and 76: policymaking 32 . From 2000 to 2006
Page 77 and 78: had removed suspended sentences as
Page 79 and 80: Chapter Four:Resistance to Penal Po
Page 81 and 82: 2004: 44). The situation worsened i
Page 83 and 84: were designed to address New Zealan
Page 85 and 86: $3.341 million annually from 2009/2
Page 87 and 88: organisation, was interested in bur
Page 89 and 90: Because of the capability of the me
Page 91 and 92: The case of Graeme BurtonThe second
Page 93 and 94: ‘parole should be a privilege, no
Page 95 and 96: given the difficulties in measureme
Page 97 and 98: package to prioritise this issue. H
Page 99 and 100: emained insecure and overtly puniti
Page 101 and 102: the end of its tenure. As a result,
Page 103 and 104: The thesis has explained and analys
Page 105 and 106: main determinants are addressed. As
Page 107 and 108: Atkinson, J. (2002). Structures of
Page 109 and 110: Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008b
Page 111 and 112: Cullen, P., & Lloyd, C. (1991). Lob
Page 113 and 114: Department of Statistics (N.Z) (199
Page 115 and 116: Hall, G., & O'Driscoll, S. (2002).
Page 117 and 118: Johnson, R. J., & Ogloff, J. R. P.
Page 119 and 120: Maguire, M. (2002). Crime data and
Page 121 and 122: Ministry of Justice (2002a). Senten
Page 123: New Zealand Parliament (1993a). Cri
Page 127 and 128: O'Conner, D. (2006). Effective Inte
Page 129 and 130: Prisoners in line for waist restrai
Page 131 and 132: Sentencing Amendment Act. (2007). R
Page 133 and 134: http://www.stats.govt.nz/products
Page 135 and 136: contours of New Zealand (pp. 1111
show all

By Tess Bartlett - Rethinking Crime and Punishment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?