12.07.2015 Views

Copulas: a Review and Recent Developments (2007)

Copulas: a Review and Recent Developments (2007)

Copulas: a Review and Recent Developments (2007)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(iii) Q satis¯es Lipschitz's condition, i.e. for all u 1 ;u 2 ;v 1 ;v 2 2 [0; 1]jQ(u 1 ;v 1 ) ¡ Q(u 2 ;v 2 )j·ju 1 ¡ u 2 j + jv 1 ¡ v 2 j: ¥Each copula is a quasi-copula, but there exist quasi-copulas which are not copulas.Thereasonisthatcondition(iii)inlasttheorem is less restrictive than the 2-increasingcopula property (see the Formal copula de¯nition).Example (quasi-copula which is not copula). Such is the function8< uv; if 0 · v · 0:25;Q 2 (u; v) = uv + 1 (4v ¡ 1)sin(2¼u); if 0:25 · v · 0:5;:24uv + 1 (1 ¡ v)sin(2¼u); if 0:5 · v · 1;24considered by Genest et al. (1999).LetusnotethatNelsenetal. (2002b)provide a new simple characterization ofquasi-copulas in terms of absolute continuity of their vertical <strong>and</strong> horizontal sections.We know that for every copula C <strong>and</strong> any rectangle R =[u 1 ;u 2 ]£[v 1 ;v 2 ] 2 [0; 1] 2 ,the C-volume of R denoted by V C (R) is a value between [0; 1]. The next theorempresents the corresponding result for quasi-copulas.Theorem (bounds for quasi-copulas, Nelsen et al. (2004)). Let Q be a quasicopula,<strong>and</strong> R =[u 1 ;u 2 ] £ [v 1 ;v 2 ] 2 [0; 1] 2 any rectangle. Then ¡ 1 3 · V Q(R) · 1.Furthermore, V Q (R) =1if <strong>and</strong> only if R =[0; 1] 2 ,<strong>and</strong>V Q (R) =¡ 1 3 implies R =[ 1; 2 3 3 ]2 . ¥In Nelsen et al. (2004) is developed a method based on quasi-copulas in order to¯nd the best-possible bounds (improving thus the usual Frechet bounds) on bivariatedistributions functions with ¯xed marginals, when additional informations of adistribution-free nature is known.Let C be a non-empty set of copulas with a common domain D. Let C inf <strong>and</strong>C sup denote, respectively, the point-wise in¯mum <strong>and</strong> supremum of C, i.e. foreach(u; v) 2 D we de¯neC inf (u; v) =inffC(u; v) :C 2 Cg <strong>and</strong> C sup (u; v) =supfC(u; v) :C 2 Cg:The functions C inf <strong>and</strong> C sup are bounds for C since for each C 2 C we haveC inf (u; v) · C(u; v) · C sup (u; v) forall(u; v) 2 D, <strong>and</strong> are clearly point-wise bestpossible. The following theorem states that the above bounds for a non-empty set ofcopulas are also quasi-copulas.Theorem (best possible bounds, Nelsen et al. (2004)). Let C be a non-emptyset of copulas. Then C inf <strong>and</strong> C sup are quasi-copulas. ¥In a recent study, Nelsen et al. (2002a) de¯ne <strong>and</strong> show basic properties of multivariateArchimedian quasi-copulas. In particular, properties concerning generators,diagonal sections, permutation symmetry, level sets <strong>and</strong> order are examined.12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!