The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning
The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning
Part IIIThe experience of s pace and timeI hear the ruin of all space, shattered glass and toppling masonry, andtime one livid final flame.James Joyce
12IntroductionMarshall Berman (1982) equates modernity (among other things) witha certain mode of experience of space and time. Daniel Bell (1978,107 -11) argues that the various movements that brought modernismto its apogee had to work out a new logic in the conception of spaceand motion. He suggests, furthermore, that the organization of spacehas 'become the primary aesthetic problem of mid-twentieth centuryculture as the problem of time (in Bergson, Proust, and Joyce) wasthe primary aesthetic problem of the first decades of this century.'Frederic Jameson (1984b) attributes the postmodern shift to a crisisin our experience of space and time, a crisis in which spatial categoriescome to dominate those of time, while themselves undergoing such amutation that we cannot keep pace. 'We do not yet possess theperceptual equipment to match this new kind of hyperspace,' hewrites, 'in part because our perceptual habits were formed in thatolder kind of space I have called the space of high modernism.'In what follows, I shall accept these statements at their face value.But since few trouble to explain exactly what they mean by them, Ishall give an account of space and time in social life so as to highlightmaterial links between political-economic and cultural processes.This will allow me to explore the link between postmodernism andthe transition from Fordism to more flexible modes of capital accumulationvia the mediations of spatial and temporal experiences.Space and time are basic categories of human existence. Yet werarely debate their meanIngs; we tend to take them for granted, andgive them common-sense or selI::Cevident attributions. We record thepassage of time in seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, years,decades, centuries, and eras, as if everything has its place upon asingle objective time scale. Even though time in physics is a difficultand contentious concept, we do not usually let that interfere with thecommon-sense of time around which we organize daily routines. We
- Page 53 and 54: 96 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 55 and 56: 100 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 57 and 58: 104 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 59 and 60: 108 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 61 and 62: 112 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 63 and 64: 116 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 65 and 66: 7IntroductionIf there has been some
- Page 67 and 68: 124 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 69 and 70: 128 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 71 and 72: 132 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 73 and 74: 136 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 75 and 76: 140 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 77 and 78: From Fordism to flexible accumulati
- Page 79 and 80: 12 10Ql+-'l:'+-' 8CQlE>E 6Cl.EQlC4Q
- Page 81 and 82: 152 political-economic capitalist t
- Page 83 and 84: 156 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 85 and 86: 160 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 87 and 88: 164 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 89 and 90: 168 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 91 and 92: 172 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 93 and 94: 176 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 95 and 96: 180 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 97 and 98: 184 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 99 and 100: 188 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 101 and 102: 192 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 103: 196 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 107 and 108: 204 The experience of space and tim
- Page 109 and 110: 208 The experience of space and tim
- Page 111 and 112: 212tThe experience of space and tim
- Page 113 and 114: 216 The experience of space and tim
- Page 115 and 116: Table 3.1 A 'grid' of spatial pract
- Page 117 and 118: TypeEnduringtimeDeceptivetimeErrati
- Page 119 and 120: I228 The experience of space and ti
- Page 121 and 122: 232 The experience of space and tim
- Page 123 and 124: 236 The experience of space and tim
- Page 125 and 126: 15The time and space of theEnlighte
- Page 127 and 128: 244 The experience of space and tim
- Page 129 and 130: Plate 3 5 Dynasty versus the map: t
- Page 131 and 132: 252 The experience of space and tim
- Page 133 and 134: Time and space of the Enlightenment
- Page 135 and 136: The rise of modernism as a cultural
- Page 137 and 138: 264 The experience of space and tim
- Page 139 and 140: 268 The experience of space and tim
- Page 141 and 142: 272 The experience of space and tim
- Page 143 and 144: 276 The experience of space and tim
- Page 145 and 146: 280 The experience of space and tim
- Page 147 and 148: 17Time-space compresson and thepost
- Page 149 and 150: 288 The experience of space and tim
- Page 151 and 152: 292 The experience of space and tim
- Page 153 and 154: 296 The experience of space and tim
12IntroductionMarshall Berman (1982) equates modernity (among other things) witha certain mode <strong>of</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> space and time. Daniel Bell (1978,107 -11) argues that the various movements that brought modernismto its apogee had to work out a new logic in the conception <strong>of</strong> spaceand motion. He suggests, furthermore, that the organization <strong>of</strong> spacehas 'become the primary aesthetic problem <strong>of</strong> mid-twentieth centuryculture as the problem <strong>of</strong> time (in Bergson, Proust, and Joyce) wasthe primary aesthetic problem <strong>of</strong> the first decades <strong>of</strong> this century.'Frederic Jameson (1984b) attributes the postmodern shift to a crisisin our experience <strong>of</strong> space and time, a crisis in which spatial categoriescome to dominate those <strong>of</strong> time, while themselves undergoing such amutation that we cannot keep pace. 'We do not yet possess theperceptual equipment to match this new kind <strong>of</strong> hyperspace,' hewrites, 'in part because our perceptual habits were formed in thatolder kind <strong>of</strong> space I have called the space <strong>of</strong> high modernism.'In what follows, I shall accept these statements at their face value.But since few trouble to explain exactly what they mean by them, Ishall give an account <strong>of</strong> space and time in social life so as to highlightmaterial links between political-economic and cultural processes.This will allow me to explore the link between postmodernism andthe transition from Fordism to more flexible modes <strong>of</strong> capital accumulationvia the mediations <strong>of</strong> spatial and temporal experiences.Space and time are basic categories <strong>of</strong> human existence. Yet werarely debate their meanIngs; we tend to take them for granted, andgive them common-sense or selI::Cevident attributions. We record thepassage <strong>of</strong> time in seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, years,decades, centuries, and eras, as if everything has its place upon asingle objective time scale. Even though time in physics is a difficultand contentious concept, we do not usually let that interfere with thecommon-sense <strong>of</strong> time around which we organize daily routines. We