12.07.2015 Views

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Agency-specific objectives to close the diversity gap <strong>in</strong>the <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong> by 2030Recruitment <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong> is ledby agencies, not by OPM and OMB, so it is <strong>in</strong> agenciesthat real change will happen. Agency plans should alsoconta<strong>in</strong> a strong commitment to clos<strong>in</strong>g the diversitygap. Specifically, we recommend agency-specific objectivesto close the diversity gap <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong><strong>Service</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terim milestones for every fouryears commenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2015. Each agency should set itsown milestones tak<strong>in</strong>g account of the current level ofrepresentation and the likely turnover <strong>in</strong> its most seniorranks over the com<strong>in</strong>g years. But together, agencyobjectives and milestones should be consistent with thegovernment-wide plan. Agencies should also considersett<strong>in</strong>g objectives for representation <strong>in</strong> key feedergrades, especially for Hispanics.It is important that the objectives and milestones arejust that—<strong>in</strong>dications of the amount of progress thatagencies hope to make. They should not be quotasand they should not impact decisions on who to hire.Never should anyone responsible for recruitment<strong>in</strong>to the <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong> feel they shouldoffer someone a job merely because of their ethnic,racial, or gender background. Not only would thatlead to a poorer-quality government but it would alsounderm<strong>in</strong>e the confidence of all applicants. Nobodywants to feel they got a job because they looked rightbut were not the best candidate, which is a recipe for failure <strong>in</strong> the job. It isalso likely to lead to a backlash from whites or men who will feel that they arewrongly disadvantaged.Instead action to promote diversity should be about attract<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>gdiverse talent, mak<strong>in</strong>g sure that the best people of color and women areattracted to a career <strong>in</strong> federal government. It must also <strong>in</strong>clude identify<strong>in</strong>gthose with the greatest potential <strong>in</strong> feeder grades to offer them support to maximizetheir career prospects.Women at Home DepotThe federal government must establish accountability fordiversity and make it easier to connect qualified womenand people of color with exist<strong>in</strong>g opportunities <strong>in</strong> the<strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong>. Technology may hold the key, asThe Home Depot Inc. is now demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g.Home Depot was the subject of a class action lawsuit thatalleged gender discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> hir<strong>in</strong>g, assignments,promotions, compensation, and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. 37 In 1998 HomeDepot attempted to improve their hir<strong>in</strong>g and promotionalpractices from the ad hoc system that was <strong>in</strong> place as theentrepreneurial company grew.The critical tool <strong>in</strong> the new system was the Job PreferenceProcess, an <strong>in</strong>-store computer and telephone systemthat automatically allowed employees and applicants tobecome part of the applicant pools that met their qualifications.The Job Preference Process took managers out ofthe process of choos<strong>in</strong>g who to <strong>in</strong>terview, and it also allowedthe company to monitor whether qualified womenand people of color were less likely to be selected.The results: S<strong>in</strong>ce its launch, female managers have<strong>in</strong>creased 30 percent and m<strong>in</strong>ority managers have<strong>in</strong>creased by 28 percent.21 Center for American Progress | A <strong>Better</strong>, <strong>More</strong> <strong>Diverse</strong> <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2050</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!