12.07.2015 Views

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

A Better, More Diverse Senior Executive Service in 2050

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Forbes Insights <strong>in</strong> 2011 conducted a comprehensive survey of more than 300senior executives from geographically diverse companies that had revenues ofat least $500 million and went up to more than $20 billion. Their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were<strong>in</strong>structive: 85 percent of executives agreed (48 percent strongly and 37 somewhatagreed) that a “diverse and <strong>in</strong>clusive workforce br<strong>in</strong>gs the different perspectivesthat a company needs to power its <strong>in</strong>novation strategy.” The larger the company,the more likely executives agreed: Of those companies with $10 billion or more <strong>in</strong>annual revenues, 56 percent strongly agreed diversity drives <strong>in</strong>novation. 15Similarly, a 2006 study published <strong>in</strong> American Sociological Review by scholarsAlexandra Kalev, Frank Dobb<strong>in</strong>, and Er<strong>in</strong> Kelly looked at more than 700 privatesectororganizations from 1971–2002. The study found that establish<strong>in</strong>g responsibilityfor diversity through “structures that embed accountability, authority, andexpertise … are the most effective means of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the proportions of whitewomen, black women, and black men <strong>in</strong> private sector management.” 16Then there’s the work done by Scott E. Page, the Leonid Hurwicz CollegiateProfessor of Complex Systems, Political Science, and Economics at the Universityof Michigan, director of the Center for the Study of Complex Systems, and a contributorto Center for American Progress’ Science Progress. Page researches theimpact of diversity on systems and performance. He characterizes diversity as the“differences <strong>in</strong> how people see, categorize, understand and go about improv<strong>in</strong>g theworld.” 17 His focus is cognitive diversity but he believes “there’s certa<strong>in</strong>ly a lot ofevidence that people’s identity groups—ethnic, racial, sexual, age—matter when itcomes to diversity <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.” 18These cognitive differences, he says, help organizational performance becausepeople from different backgrounds have different “tools” or “vary<strong>in</strong>g ways of look<strong>in</strong>gat problems.” 19 Page argues that “the sum of these tools is far more powerful<strong>in</strong> organizations with diversity than <strong>in</strong> ones where everyone has gone to the sameschools, been tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the same mold and th<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> almost identical ways.” 20A 2005 report by the Government Accountability Office similarly found that“diversity management makes good bus<strong>in</strong>ess sense that enhances productivity and<strong>in</strong>novation.” 21 The report found that a range of government and academic studiesdemonstrates that diversity can “contribute to the achievement of improved<strong>in</strong>dividual and organizational performance.” 2215 Center for American Progress | A <strong>Better</strong>, <strong>More</strong> <strong>Diverse</strong> <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2050</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!