12.07.2015 Views

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Order2. There were no feasible alternatives to bypass, such as <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>auxiliary treatment facilities, retention <strong>of</strong> untreated waste, ormaintenance during normal periods <strong>of</strong> equipment downtime. Thiscondition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should havebeen installed in <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> reasonable engineering judgment toprevent a bypass that could occur during normal periods <strong>of</strong> equipmentdowntime or preventative maintenance;3. The discharger submitted a notice at least ten days in advance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>need for a bypass to <strong>the</strong> Regional <strong>Water</strong> Board; or4. The discharger may allow a bypass to occur that does not causeeffluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it is for essentialmaintenance to assure efficient operation. In such a case, <strong>the</strong> abovebypass conditions are not applicable. The discharger shall submitnotice <strong>of</strong> an unanticipated bypass as required.M. Upset1. A discharger that wishes to establish <strong>the</strong> affirmative defense <strong>of</strong> anupset 10 in an action brought for noncompliance shall demonstrate,through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or o<strong>the</strong>rrelevant evidence that:a. An upset occurred and that <strong>the</strong> discharger can identify <strong>the</strong> cause(s)<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upsetb. The treatment facility was being properly operated by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> upsetc. The discharger submitted notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upset as required; andd. The discharger complied with any remedial measures required2. No determination made before an action <strong>of</strong> noncompliance occurs,such as during administrative review <strong>of</strong> claims that noncompliance wascaused by an upset, is final administrative action subject to judicialreview.3. In any enforcement proceeding, <strong>the</strong> discharger seeking to establish <strong>the</strong>occurrence <strong>of</strong> an upset has <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>10 An exceptional incident in which <strong>the</strong>re is unintentional and temporary noncompliance <strong>the</strong> technologybased numeric effluent limitations because <strong>of</strong> factors beyond <strong>the</strong> reasonable control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharger. Anupset does not include noncompliance to <strong>the</strong> extent caused by operational error, improperly designedtreatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack <strong>of</strong> preventative maintenance, or careless or improperoperation.2009-0009-DWQ 26 September 02, 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!