01.12.2012 Views

The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice

The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice

The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

had really died <strong>an</strong>d instead claimed that he had reached the state <strong>of</strong> immortality.<br />

Soon after Li’s death, we then learn from the account, he entrusted Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu �<br />

�, a Scribe <strong>of</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d Chui ��� 16 to adopt the techniques used by Li Shaojun.<br />

17 Interestingly enough, Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu is later mentioned in the Shiji account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

emperor’s close advisers. As <strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cial concerned with sacrifi cial matters (cigu<strong>an</strong><br />

��), <strong>an</strong>d together with a representative from the <strong>of</strong>fi ce <strong>of</strong> “<strong>The</strong> Lord the Gr<strong>an</strong>d<br />

Scribe” (taishigong ���, Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu advised the emperor advised the emperor to<br />

set up <strong>an</strong> altar to the Earth Lord in Fenyin �� where a precious tripod had been<br />

found. 18<br />

<strong>The</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> this tripod in the sixth month <strong>of</strong> the year 113 B.C. – <strong>an</strong> event<br />

<strong>of</strong> central import<strong>an</strong>ce for this study – seems to have been the result <strong>of</strong> a ceremony<br />

carried out by a sham<strong>an</strong> priest. 19 She discovered that the earth close to the area <strong>of</strong><br />

the sacrifi ce had the form <strong>of</strong> a hook. When she dug up the earth, she discovered<br />

a tripod which is said to have differed much from ordinary tripods. It bore some<br />

incised lines but no inscription. 20 She found this str<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>an</strong>d talked to the government<br />

<strong>of</strong>fi cers about it. <strong>The</strong> governor <strong>of</strong> Hedong reported the extraordinary discovery<br />

to the imperial court, upon which the emperor sent <strong>an</strong> envoy who was ordered to<br />

examine whether the mysterious discovery <strong>of</strong> the tripod was credible. As the envoy<br />

could not fi nd <strong>an</strong>y traces <strong>of</strong> deceit, he used the tripod in a sacrifi ce, took it with<br />

him <strong>an</strong>d h<strong>an</strong>ded it over to the emperor. Emperor Wu took it with him when he proceeded<br />

to perform sacrifi ces at Zhongsh<strong>an</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re, we learn, a yellow cloud appeared,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d a deer passed the emperor’s entourage whereupon the emperor shot it <strong>an</strong>d used<br />

it for a sacrifi ce.<br />

After his return to Ch<strong>an</strong>g’<strong>an</strong>, the emperor requested the responsible <strong>of</strong>fi cials 21<br />

to discuss the question <strong>of</strong> how the appear<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the tripod was to be interpreted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cials explained to him that already Taidi ��� (<strong>The</strong> Greatest <strong>The</strong>arch) 22<br />

16 Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d Chui are explained by the Jijie commentator Pei Yin (5th cent.) as the names <strong>of</strong> two districts in<br />

Donglai ��.<br />

17 Cf. Shiji 28/1386; 12/455: ����������������������It thus seems as if Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu was<br />

more or less urged by the emperor into the role <strong>of</strong> his former favorite Li Shaojun <strong>an</strong>d thus into the role <strong>of</strong> a<br />

f<strong>an</strong>gshi – or at least he must have been <strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cial who had inherited the esoteric methods <strong>of</strong> a f<strong>an</strong>gshi.<br />

18 Fenyin was located northeast <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g’<strong>an</strong>, to the east <strong>of</strong> the River He. It was a cult site to the deity Houtu (Earth<br />

Lord).<br />

19 <strong>The</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> the tripod, as well as the composition <strong>of</strong> a ceremonial song at the occasion <strong>of</strong> the discovery, is<br />

recorded also in the <strong>an</strong>nals <strong>of</strong> Emperor Wu in H<strong>an</strong> shu 6/184.<br />

20 Shiji 28/1392; 12/464 (the latter has � instead <strong>of</strong> �); H<strong>an</strong> shu 25A/1225: ���������������<br />

����� This sentence has been rather differently tr<strong>an</strong>slated by E. Chav<strong>an</strong>nes <strong>an</strong>d B. Watson. Chav<strong>an</strong>nes,<br />

Mémoires Historiques III, 482, writes: “Il était orné de dessins ciselés mais ne portait pas d’inscription gravée<br />

en creux ou en relief.” Watson, Records II, 34, has instead: “It had a pattern incised on it, but no inscription.<br />

Chav<strong>an</strong>nes tr<strong>an</strong>slation is certainly right that it is me<strong>an</strong>t here that the tripod had <strong>an</strong> inscription, but due to the<br />

fact that it was not incised in relief, its content was not decipherable.”<br />

21 <strong>The</strong> term you si ���rendered here by “the responsible <strong>of</strong>fi cials” me<strong>an</strong>s literally “those who are in charge <strong>of</strong><br />

something.” According to Charles O. Hucker, A Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Offi cial Titles in Imperial China (St<strong>an</strong>ford: University<br />

Press 1985), no. 8081, the term should be understood as a vague reference to governmental <strong>of</strong>fi cials in charge<br />

<strong>of</strong> activities at issue in particular contexts […]. In the context given here, you si seems to denote the <strong>of</strong>fi cials<br />

entrusted to advise the emperor with regard to all the questions related to sacrifi cial matters.<br />

22 According to Kong Wenxi<strong>an</strong>g ���� quoted by the Suoyin commentary, Taidi ��� is to be identifi ed with<br />

Taihao ��, i.e. Fuxi �� (Shiji 28/1392; cf. the character vari<strong>an</strong>t Dadi �� in Shiji 12/465). <strong>The</strong> H<strong>an</strong> shu<br />

commentator Y<strong>an</strong> Shigu (T<strong>an</strong>g) quoted by Sima Zhen (added to Shiji 12/466) writes that Dadi is identical with<br />

Master Taihao Fuxi <strong>an</strong>d argues that he must thus date prior to Hu<strong>an</strong>gdi.������������������<br />

�����<br />

248<br />

DOROTHEE SCHAAB-HANKE<br />

BMFEA 74 · 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!