The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice
The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice
The Power of an Alleged Tradition - CHINA Buchservice
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
had really died <strong>an</strong>d instead claimed that he had reached the state <strong>of</strong> immortality.<br />
Soon after Li’s death, we then learn from the account, he entrusted Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu �<br />
�, a Scribe <strong>of</strong> Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d Chui ��� 16 to adopt the techniques used by Li Shaojun.<br />
17 Interestingly enough, Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu is later mentioned in the Shiji account <strong>of</strong> the<br />
emperor’s close advisers. As <strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cial concerned with sacrifi cial matters (cigu<strong>an</strong><br />
��), <strong>an</strong>d together with a representative from the <strong>of</strong>fi ce <strong>of</strong> “<strong>The</strong> Lord the Gr<strong>an</strong>d<br />
Scribe” (taishigong ���, Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu advised the emperor advised the emperor to<br />
set up <strong>an</strong> altar to the Earth Lord in Fenyin �� where a precious tripod had been<br />
found. 18<br />
<strong>The</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> this tripod in the sixth month <strong>of</strong> the year 113 B.C. – <strong>an</strong> event<br />
<strong>of</strong> central import<strong>an</strong>ce for this study – seems to have been the result <strong>of</strong> a ceremony<br />
carried out by a sham<strong>an</strong> priest. 19 She discovered that the earth close to the area <strong>of</strong><br />
the sacrifi ce had the form <strong>of</strong> a hook. When she dug up the earth, she discovered<br />
a tripod which is said to have differed much from ordinary tripods. It bore some<br />
incised lines but no inscription. 20 She found this str<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>an</strong>d talked to the government<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cers about it. <strong>The</strong> governor <strong>of</strong> Hedong reported the extraordinary discovery<br />
to the imperial court, upon which the emperor sent <strong>an</strong> envoy who was ordered to<br />
examine whether the mysterious discovery <strong>of</strong> the tripod was credible. As the envoy<br />
could not fi nd <strong>an</strong>y traces <strong>of</strong> deceit, he used the tripod in a sacrifi ce, took it with<br />
him <strong>an</strong>d h<strong>an</strong>ded it over to the emperor. Emperor Wu took it with him when he proceeded<br />
to perform sacrifi ces at Zhongsh<strong>an</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re, we learn, a yellow cloud appeared,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d a deer passed the emperor’s entourage whereupon the emperor shot it <strong>an</strong>d used<br />
it for a sacrifi ce.<br />
After his return to Ch<strong>an</strong>g’<strong>an</strong>, the emperor requested the responsible <strong>of</strong>fi cials 21<br />
to discuss the question <strong>of</strong> how the appear<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the tripod was to be interpreted.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cials explained to him that already Taidi ��� (<strong>The</strong> Greatest <strong>The</strong>arch) 22<br />
16 Hu<strong>an</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d Chui are explained by the Jijie commentator Pei Yin (5th cent.) as the names <strong>of</strong> two districts in<br />
Donglai ��.<br />
17 Cf. Shiji 28/1386; 12/455: ����������������������It thus seems as if Ku<strong>an</strong> Shu was<br />
more or less urged by the emperor into the role <strong>of</strong> his former favorite Li Shaojun <strong>an</strong>d thus into the role <strong>of</strong> a<br />
f<strong>an</strong>gshi – or at least he must have been <strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong>fi cial who had inherited the esoteric methods <strong>of</strong> a f<strong>an</strong>gshi.<br />
18 Fenyin was located northeast <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>g’<strong>an</strong>, to the east <strong>of</strong> the River He. It was a cult site to the deity Houtu (Earth<br />
Lord).<br />
19 <strong>The</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> the tripod, as well as the composition <strong>of</strong> a ceremonial song at the occasion <strong>of</strong> the discovery, is<br />
recorded also in the <strong>an</strong>nals <strong>of</strong> Emperor Wu in H<strong>an</strong> shu 6/184.<br />
20 Shiji 28/1392; 12/464 (the latter has � instead <strong>of</strong> �); H<strong>an</strong> shu 25A/1225: ���������������<br />
����� This sentence has been rather differently tr<strong>an</strong>slated by E. Chav<strong>an</strong>nes <strong>an</strong>d B. Watson. Chav<strong>an</strong>nes,<br />
Mémoires Historiques III, 482, writes: “Il était orné de dessins ciselés mais ne portait pas d’inscription gravée<br />
en creux ou en relief.” Watson, Records II, 34, has instead: “It had a pattern incised on it, but no inscription.<br />
Chav<strong>an</strong>nes tr<strong>an</strong>slation is certainly right that it is me<strong>an</strong>t here that the tripod had <strong>an</strong> inscription, but due to the<br />
fact that it was not incised in relief, its content was not decipherable.”<br />
21 <strong>The</strong> term you si ���rendered here by “the responsible <strong>of</strong>fi cials” me<strong>an</strong>s literally “those who are in charge <strong>of</strong><br />
something.” According to Charles O. Hucker, A Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Offi cial Titles in Imperial China (St<strong>an</strong>ford: University<br />
Press 1985), no. 8081, the term should be understood as a vague reference to governmental <strong>of</strong>fi cials in charge<br />
<strong>of</strong> activities at issue in particular contexts […]. In the context given here, you si seems to denote the <strong>of</strong>fi cials<br />
entrusted to advise the emperor with regard to all the questions related to sacrifi cial matters.<br />
22 According to Kong Wenxi<strong>an</strong>g ���� quoted by the Suoyin commentary, Taidi ��� is to be identifi ed with<br />
Taihao ��, i.e. Fuxi �� (Shiji 28/1392; cf. the character vari<strong>an</strong>t Dadi �� in Shiji 12/465). <strong>The</strong> H<strong>an</strong> shu<br />
commentator Y<strong>an</strong> Shigu (T<strong>an</strong>g) quoted by Sima Zhen (added to Shiji 12/466) writes that Dadi is identical with<br />
Master Taihao Fuxi <strong>an</strong>d argues that he must thus date prior to Hu<strong>an</strong>gdi.������������������<br />
�����<br />
248<br />
DOROTHEE SCHAAB-HANKE<br />
BMFEA 74 · 2002