12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chaptev 4Pet e r S It e ha nCOMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTIONSTRATEGIES IN LANGUAGE LEARNINGN AN INFLUENTIAL PAPER WHICH discusses differences between firstI and second language learn<strong>in</strong>g, Bley-Vroman (1989) draws attention to the extent towhich second language (L2) learn<strong>in</strong>g often does not lead to success while first languagelearn<strong>in</strong>g, except <strong>in</strong> unusual cases, does. Faced with such an unsettl<strong>in</strong>g vote of no confidence,it is hardly surpris<strong>in</strong>g that the language teach<strong>in</strong>g profession has explored many alternatives<strong>in</strong> the search to f<strong>in</strong>d more effective methods (Larsen-Freeman 1986). And it is equallyunsurpris<strong>in</strong>g that one of the responses the profession has made is to see whether approachesto second language tcach<strong>in</strong>g which connect withfirst language acquisition hold out anypromise.This chapter will review two such <strong>in</strong>structional approaches. The first is broadlyconcerned with comprehension-driven learn<strong>in</strong>g, regard<strong>in</strong>g second language developmentas likely to proceed, under the right conditions, simply as a result of exposure to mean<strong>in</strong>gful<strong>in</strong>put.The second, which <strong>in</strong> some ways arose out of dissatisfaction with the first, proposesthat engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction and produc<strong>in</strong>g output will be sufficient to drive second languagedevelopment forward. In each case, clearly, <strong>in</strong>terlanguage development is seen to be theby-product of cngag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g-process<strong>in</strong>g ~ <strong>in</strong> the first case through comprchcnsion,and <strong>in</strong> the second through production. As a broader aim, the chapter develops the claim that<strong>in</strong>structional activities that emphasize mean<strong>in</strong>g, whether comprehension or productionbased,may <strong>in</strong>duce learners to rely on strategies for communication which result <strong>in</strong> abypass<strong>in</strong>g of the form of language.The place of comprehension <strong>in</strong> language learn<strong>in</strong>gThe clearest example of a comprehension-based account of second language developmentderives from Krashcn (1985). He proposed that comprehensible <strong>in</strong>put is the driv<strong>in</strong>g forcefor <strong>in</strong>terlanguage development and change, and that the effects of such change carry over to<strong>in</strong>fluence production ~ that is, one learns to speak by listen<strong>in</strong>g, a claim,which is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gbecause of <strong>its</strong> counter-<strong>in</strong>tuitive nature. Krashen argues that thc prcdictability of the contextmakes what is said function as a commentary on what is already understood. The result isthat it is more likely that thc <strong>in</strong>terlanguage system will be extended by the context-tolanguagemapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!