12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTORS AFFECTING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING 35Learner preferencesLearners have clear preferences for how they go about learn<strong>in</strong>g new material. The term‘learn<strong>in</strong>g style’ has been used to describe an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s natural, habitual, and preferred wayof absorb<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>g, and reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong>formation and skills (Reid 1995). We have allheard people say that they cannot learn someth<strong>in</strong>g until they have seen it. Such learnerswould fall <strong>in</strong>to the group called ‘visual’ learners. Other people, who may be called ‘aural’learners, seem to need only to hear someth<strong>in</strong>g once or twice before they know it. For others,who are referred to as ‘k<strong>in</strong>aesthetic’ learners, there is a need to add a physical action to thelearn<strong>in</strong>g process. In contrast to these perceptually based learn<strong>in</strong>g styles, considerable researchhas focused on a cognitive learn<strong>in</strong>g style dist<strong>in</strong>ction betweenfield <strong>in</strong>dependent andfielddependent learners. This refers to whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual tends to separate details from thegeneral background or to see th<strong>in</strong>gs more holistically. Another category of learn<strong>in</strong>g styles isbased on the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s temperament or personality.While recent years have seen the development of many learn<strong>in</strong>g style assessment<strong>in</strong>struments, very little research has exam<strong>in</strong>ed the <strong>in</strong>teraction between different learn<strong>in</strong>gstylcs and success <strong>in</strong> second language acquisition. At present, the only learn<strong>in</strong>g style that hasbeen extensively <strong>in</strong>vestigated is the field <strong>in</strong>dependencc/dependence dist<strong>in</strong>ction.The resultsfrom this research have shown that while field <strong>in</strong>dependence is related to some degree toperformance on certa<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ds of tasks, it is not a good predictor of performance on others.Although there is a need for considerably more research on learn<strong>in</strong>g styles, whenlearners express a preference for see<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g written or for memoriz<strong>in</strong>g materialwhich we feel should be learned <strong>in</strong> a less formal way, we should not assume that their waysof work<strong>in</strong>g are wrong. Instead, we should encourage them to use all means available to themas they work to learn another language. At a m<strong>in</strong>imum, research on learn<strong>in</strong>g styles shouldmake us sceptical of claims that a particular teach<strong>in</strong>g method or textbook will suit the needsof all learners.Learner beliefsSecond language learners are not always conscious of their <strong>in</strong>dividual learn<strong>in</strong>g styles,but virtually all learners, particularly older learners, have strong beliefs and op<strong>in</strong>ions abouthow their <strong>in</strong>struction should be delivered .These beliefs are usually based on previous learn<strong>in</strong>gexperiences and the assumption (right or wrong) that a particular type of <strong>in</strong>struction is thebest way for them to 1earn.This is another area where little work has been done. However,the available research <strong>in</strong>dicates that learner beliefs can be strong mediat<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong> theirexperience <strong>in</strong> the classroom. For example, <strong>in</strong> a survey of <strong>in</strong>ternational students learn<strong>in</strong>gESL <strong>in</strong> a highly communicative program at an <strong>English</strong>-speak<strong>in</strong>g university, Carlos Yorio(1 986) found high levels of dissatisfaction among the students. The type of communicative<strong>in</strong>struction they received focused exclusively on mean<strong>in</strong>g and spontaneous communication<strong>in</strong> group-work <strong>in</strong>teraction. In their responses to a questionnaire, the majority of studentsexpressed concerns about several aspects of their <strong>in</strong>struction, most notably, the absence ofattention to language form, corrective feedback, or teacher-centred <strong>in</strong>struction. Althoughthis study did not directly exam<strong>in</strong>e learners’ progress <strong>in</strong> relation to their op<strong>in</strong>ions about the<strong>in</strong>struction they received, several of them were conv<strong>in</strong>ced that their progress was negativelyaffected by an <strong>in</strong>structional approach which was not consistent with their beliefs about thebest ways for them to learn.Learners’ preferences for learn<strong>in</strong>g, whether due to their learn<strong>in</strong>g style or to their beliefsabout how languages are learned, will <strong>in</strong>fluence the k<strong>in</strong>ds of strategies they choose <strong>in</strong> order

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!