12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

246 NEIL MERCERAs <strong>in</strong> much classroom talk, <strong>in</strong> Sequence 2 we can also see IRF exchanges occurr<strong>in</strong>g,though here as slightly more complex, l<strong>in</strong>ked structures, <strong>in</strong> which the student <strong>in</strong>terjectsdur<strong>in</strong>g the teacher’s elicitations, perhaps seek<strong>in</strong>g clarification which the teacher provides.And if we consider the content and function of the question-and-answer exchanges <strong>in</strong> thetwo sequences, we can see that someth<strong>in</strong>g rather different is go<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong> each of them. InSequence 1, the teacher is ask<strong>in</strong>g her primary school pupils to produce <strong>English</strong> sentenceswhich conform to the models she has <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. The children respond by try<strong>in</strong>g to providethese ‘right answers’. The teacher <strong>in</strong> Sequence 2 is not do<strong>in</strong>g that. Instead, she is ask<strong>in</strong>gquestions to encourage the students to elaborate, <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong>, on what they have written. Inthis way, the teacher is not so much try<strong>in</strong>g to elicit particular forms or structures of <strong>English</strong>,but rather encourag<strong>in</strong>g the student to use <strong>English</strong> <strong>in</strong> a practical, communicative manner. Iam not suggest<strong>in</strong>g that either teacher is us<strong>in</strong>g their question<strong>in</strong>g techniques to better or worseeffect, but simply illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the fact that IRF exchanges can be made to serve a variety ofpragmatic, educational functions.Techniques for teach<strong>in</strong>gHav<strong>in</strong>g identified the archetypal structure of teacher-student talk, I will next describe somespecific ways of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with students which are commonly used by teachers. I call these‘techniques’ , because I believe that they represent teachers attempt<strong>in</strong>g to shape language<strong>in</strong>to a set of suitable tools for pursu<strong>in</strong>g their professional goals. I will illustrate each techniqueand consider how they can contribute to the process of teach<strong>in</strong>g-and-learn<strong>in</strong>g. Thetechniques are summarised <strong>in</strong> Table 1 5.1 below.Toble 15.1 Some techniques that tcachera use. . . to elicit knowledge from learnersDirect elicitationsCued elicitations. . . to respond to what learners sayConfirmationsRejectionsRepetitionsReformulationsElaborations. . . to describe significant aspects of shared experienceamplificationsexplanations‘we’ statementsrecapsElicit<strong>in</strong>g knowledgefrom learnersWe have seen that when a teacher <strong>in</strong>itiates an IRF sequence, this usually has the function ofelicit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from a student. If this is simply a straightforward request, we candescribe the teacher’s verbal act as a direct elicitation. But teachers also often engage <strong>in</strong> whatcan be called cued elicitation, which is a way of draw<strong>in</strong>g out from learners the <strong>in</strong>formation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!