12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SAFE-TALI< 233function is to signal participation rather than level of understand<strong>in</strong>g, i.e. it is aga<strong>in</strong> socialrather than academic <strong>in</strong> purpose.The social function of chorus<strong>in</strong>g became even more clearly evident when Iexam<strong>in</strong>ed the lesson as a whole. I discovered that the students are required, <strong>in</strong> response toboth k<strong>in</strong>ds of cue, to provide ma<strong>in</strong>ly confirmative onc- or two-word responses, or responseswhich repeat <strong>in</strong>formation on the board or <strong>in</strong>formation which has been recycled aga<strong>in</strong> andaga<strong>in</strong> by Mrs Gumbi. This suggests that chorus<strong>in</strong>g gives the students opportunities toparticipate <strong>in</strong> ways that reducc the possibility of the loss of face associated with provid<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>correct responses to tcacher elicitations, or not be<strong>in</strong>g able to provide responses at all. Itis <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that the chorus<strong>in</strong>g is more evident at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the lesson thanlater on. Once responses have been well rehearsed, so that the chance of be<strong>in</strong>g wrongpublicly is reduced, more <strong>in</strong>dividual responses are elicited, and at the end students are even<strong>in</strong>vited to leave their desks and carry out the very public act of writ<strong>in</strong>g their responseson the board.There is, of course, noth<strong>in</strong>g unusual about teachers need<strong>in</strong>g to resort to face-sav<strong>in</strong>gstrategies, s<strong>in</strong>ce the asymmetrical role relations between teachers and students to be found<strong>in</strong> most parts of the world ensure that the risk of face-threat is great. As Cwden (1 979: 147)expla<strong>in</strong>s, ‘teachers, by the very nature of their professional role, are cont<strong>in</strong>uously threaten<strong>in</strong>gboth aspects of their students’ face constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their freedom of action; evaluat<strong>in</strong>g, oftennegatively, a high proportion of student acts and utterances; and often <strong>in</strong>terrupt<strong>in</strong>g studentwork and student talk’. To reduce this risk, teachers employ face-sav<strong>in</strong>g strategies such asexpress<strong>in</strong>g directives <strong>in</strong>directly by means of <strong>in</strong>terrogatives, e.g. ‘Can you open your books,please?’ This strategy reduces the sense of imposition associated with the directiveby suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the students are free to decide whether or not to comply. However, theneed to resort to face-sav<strong>in</strong>g strategies is particularly great <strong>in</strong> KwaZulu classrooms becausethe asymmetry <strong>in</strong> the relative status of teachers and students is marked. This reflects themarked asymmetry <strong>in</strong> the relativc status of adults and childrcn <strong>in</strong> the wider community.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mariannc Claude’s <strong>in</strong>formants (see Chick and Claude 1985), an adult <strong>in</strong> thatcommunity has the right to ask any child, who may well be a stranger, to do errands forthem (i.e. take a message to someone; buy someth<strong>in</strong>g at the shop) and may even chastise achild not their own.Another strik<strong>in</strong>g feature of this episode is the remarkably rhythmic manner <strong>in</strong> whichteacher and students synchronise their verbal and prosodic behaviours, particularly <strong>in</strong>accomplish<strong>in</strong>g the chorus<strong>in</strong>g sequences. <strong>Context</strong> analysts (e.g. Schefl<strong>in</strong> 1973; Condon 1977;Kendon 1973, 1979; McDermott, Gospod<strong>in</strong>off and Aaron 1978) have demonstrated thatparticipants <strong>in</strong> conversations organise their behaviours <strong>in</strong> co-operative, reciprocal,rhythmically co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated ways <strong>in</strong> signall<strong>in</strong>g to one another and negotiat<strong>in</strong>g the context oftheir talk.This enables them to make sense of what it is that they are do<strong>in</strong>g together. In theepisode such <strong>in</strong>teractional synchrony is possible, presumably, because the teacher and herstudents are able to draw on their shared, implicit knowledge of the discourse conventionsassociated with conventional <strong>in</strong>teractional styles. I suggest that this synchrony contributesto the perception that purposeful activity and learn<strong>in</strong>g are tak<strong>in</strong>g place.To sum up, the micro-ethnographic analysis of this episode reveals <strong>in</strong>teractionalbehaviour consistent with Zulu-<strong>English</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractional styles identified <strong>in</strong> a study of <strong>in</strong>terethnicencounters (see Chick 1985). Particularly noteworthy features of the discourse are thechorus<strong>in</strong>g behaviour and the remarkably rhythmic manner <strong>in</strong> which the participantssynchronise their <strong>in</strong>teractional behaviours <strong>in</strong> accomplish<strong>in</strong>g the chorus<strong>in</strong>g sequences.Analysis revealed that thcse putative styles serve social rather than academic functions. Forexample, they help the students to avoid the loss of face associated with bc<strong>in</strong>g wrong <strong>in</strong> a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!