English Language Teaching in its Social Context

~ (1~ (1190 MICHAEL H. LONGSpada, N. (1986) “The interaction between types of content and types of instruction: someeffects on the L2 proficicncy of adult lcarncrs.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition8 /2.18 1-199.987) “Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: aprocess-product study of communicative language teaching.” Applied Linguistics8.137-1 61 .Stauble, A.-M. (1981) A comparative study $a Spanish-English undjapanese-English second languagecontinuum: verb phrase morphology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Swaffer, J.K., Arens, K. and Morgan, M. (1982) “Teacher classroom practices: redefiningmethod as task hierarchy.” Modern Language journal 66.24-33.Von Elek, T. and Oskarsson, M. (1975) Comparative Methods Experiments in Foreign LanguageTeaching. Department of Educational Research. Gothenburg, Sweden: Molnda School ofEducation.White, L. (1987) “Against comprehensible input: the Input Hypothesis and the development ofsecond-language competence.” Applied Linguistics 8/2.95-110.White, L. (1989) ‘The principle of adjacency in second language acquisition: do learnersobserve the subset principle?’ Paper presented at the Child Language Conference BostonMA. March.Wode, H. (1 981) “Language-acquisitional universals: a unified view of language acquisition.”Native Language and Foreign Languuge Acquisition. (Annuls ofthe New York Academy ofsciences379) ed. by H. Winitz, 2 18-234. NewYork: NewYork Academy of Sciences.Zobl, H. (1982) “A direction for contrastive analysis: the comparative study of developmentalsequences.” TESOL Quarterly 16. 169-183.985) “Grammars in search of input and intake.” Input in Second Language Acquisition cd.by S.M. Gass and C. Madden, 329-344. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.