12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~ (1989)~ (1~ (1984)~ (1~ (1~ (1188 MICHAEL H. LONGGillis, M. and Weber, R. (1976) “The emergence of sentence modalities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>English</strong> ofjapanese-speak<strong>in</strong>g children.” <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g 26/ 1.77-94.Harley, B. (1 988) “Effects of <strong>in</strong>struction on SLA: issues and evidence.” Annual Review $AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics 9.165-178.“Functional grammar <strong>in</strong> French immersion: a classroom experiment.” AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics 1013.331-359.Hilles, S. (1 986). “Intcrlanguage and the pro-drop parameter.” Second <strong>Language</strong> Research2/1.33-52.Hoetker, J. and Ahlbrand, W.P. (1969) “The persistence of the recitation.” American EducationalResearch Journal 6/1/ 145-167.Hyams, N. (1983) “The pro-drop parameter <strong>in</strong> child grammars.’’ Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs $ the West CoastConference on Formal L<strong>in</strong>guistics ed. by M. Barlow, D. Flick<strong>in</strong>ger and M. Westcoat. Stanford,CA: Stanford University, Department of L<strong>in</strong>guistics.Hyltenstam, K. (1977) “Implicational patterns <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlanguage syntax variation.” <strong>Language</strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g 27/2.383411.984) “The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors <strong>in</strong> second languageacquisition: the case of pronom<strong>in</strong>al copies <strong>in</strong> relative clauses.” Second <strong>Language</strong>s. A Cross-L<strong>in</strong>guistic Perspective ed. by R.W. Anderscn, 39-58. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Johnston, M. (1985) Syntactic and morphological progressions <strong>in</strong> learner <strong>English</strong>. Canberra,Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.Keenan, E. and Comrie, B. (1977) “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar.”L<strong>in</strong>guisticInquiry 8.63-99.Kellerman, E. (1985) “If at first you do succeed . . . ” Input <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. byS. Gass and C. Madden, 345-353. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Krashen, S.D. and Seliger, H.W. (1975) “The essential contributions of formal <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong>adult second language learn<strong>in</strong>g.” TESOL Quarter!,9/ 12.173-1 83.Krashen, S.D. andTerrel1,T. (1983) The Natural Approach. NewYork: Pergamon Press.Larscn-Freeman, D. and Long, M.H. (1989) Research Priorities <strong>in</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>gand <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s University, National Foreign <strong>Language</strong>Center.Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M.H. (1991) An Introduction to Second <strong>Language</strong> AcquisitionResearch. London: Longman.Lightbown, P.M. (1983) “Explor<strong>in</strong>g relationships between developmental and <strong>in</strong>structionalsequences.” Classroom-Oriented Research on Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. by H. W. Seligerand M.H. Long, 217-243. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Long, M.H. (1983) “DOCS <strong>in</strong>struction make a difference? A review of research.” TESOLQuarter!, 17 / 3.359-3 82.“Process and product <strong>in</strong> ESL program evaluation.” TESOL Quarter!,18 / 3.409425.985) “A role for <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> second language acquisition: task-based languageteach<strong>in</strong>g.” Modell<strong>in</strong>g and Assess<strong>in</strong>g Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. by K. Hyltenstam and M.Pienemann, 77-99. Clevedon, Avon: Multil<strong>in</strong>gual Matters.988) “Instructed <strong>in</strong>terlanguage development.” Issues <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition.Multiple Perspectives ed by L.M. Beebe, 115-141. NewYork: Newbury House.991) “The design and psychol<strong>in</strong>guistic motivation of research on foreign languagelearn<strong>in</strong>g.’’ Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition Research and the Classroom ed. by B. Freed. Boston:D.C. Heak<strong>in</strong>...- (2001) Task-Based <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Long, M.H.,Adams, L., McLean, M. and Castanos, F. (1976) “Do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs with words: verbal<strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> lockstep and small group classroom situations.” On TESOL. ‘76 ed. byJ.F. Fanselow and R. Crymes, 137-153. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC:TESOL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!