English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
~ (1989)~ (1~ (1984)~ (1~ (1~ (1188 MICHAEL H. LONGGillis, M. and Weber, R. (1976) “The emergence of sentence modalities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>English</strong> ofjapanese-speak<strong>in</strong>g children.” <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g 26/ 1.77-94.Harley, B. (1 988) “Effects of <strong>in</strong>struction on SLA: issues and evidence.” Annual Review $AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics 9.165-178.“Functional grammar <strong>in</strong> French immersion: a classroom experiment.” AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics 1013.331-359.Hilles, S. (1 986). “Intcrlanguage and the pro-drop parameter.” Second <strong>Language</strong> Research2/1.33-52.Hoetker, J. and Ahlbrand, W.P. (1969) “The persistence of the recitation.” American EducationalResearch Journal 6/1/ 145-167.Hyams, N. (1983) “The pro-drop parameter <strong>in</strong> child grammars.’’ Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs $ the West CoastConference on Formal L<strong>in</strong>guistics ed. by M. Barlow, D. Flick<strong>in</strong>ger and M. Westcoat. Stanford,CA: Stanford University, Department of L<strong>in</strong>guistics.Hyltenstam, K. (1977) “Implicational patterns <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlanguage syntax variation.” <strong>Language</strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g 27/2.383411.984) “The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors <strong>in</strong> second languageacquisition: the case of pronom<strong>in</strong>al copies <strong>in</strong> relative clauses.” Second <strong>Language</strong>s. A Cross-L<strong>in</strong>guistic Perspective ed. by R.W. Anderscn, 39-58. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Johnston, M. (1985) Syntactic and morphological progressions <strong>in</strong> learner <strong>English</strong>. Canberra,Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.Keenan, E. and Comrie, B. (1977) “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar.”L<strong>in</strong>guisticInquiry 8.63-99.Kellerman, E. (1985) “If at first you do succeed . . . ” Input <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. byS. Gass and C. Madden, 345-353. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Krashen, S.D. and Seliger, H.W. (1975) “The essential contributions of formal <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong>adult second language learn<strong>in</strong>g.” TESOL Quarter!,9/ 12.173-1 83.Krashen, S.D. andTerrel1,T. (1983) The Natural Approach. NewYork: Pergamon Press.Larscn-Freeman, D. and Long, M.H. (1989) Research Priorities <strong>in</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>gand <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s University, National Foreign <strong>Language</strong>Center.Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M.H. (1991) An Introduction to Second <strong>Language</strong> AcquisitionResearch. London: Longman.Lightbown, P.M. (1983) “Explor<strong>in</strong>g relationships between developmental and <strong>in</strong>structionalsequences.” Classroom-Oriented Research on Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. by H. W. Seligerand M.H. Long, 217-243. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Long, M.H. (1983) “DOCS <strong>in</strong>struction make a difference? A review of research.” TESOLQuarter!, 17 / 3.359-3 82.“Process and product <strong>in</strong> ESL program evaluation.” TESOL Quarter!,18 / 3.409425.985) “A role for <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> second language acquisition: task-based languageteach<strong>in</strong>g.” Modell<strong>in</strong>g and Assess<strong>in</strong>g Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition ed. by K. Hyltenstam and M.Pienemann, 77-99. Clevedon, Avon: Multil<strong>in</strong>gual Matters.988) “Instructed <strong>in</strong>terlanguage development.” Issues <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition.Multiple Perspectives ed by L.M. Beebe, 115-141. NewYork: Newbury House.991) “The design and psychol<strong>in</strong>guistic motivation of research on foreign languagelearn<strong>in</strong>g.’’ Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition Research and the Classroom ed. by B. Freed. Boston:D.C. Heak<strong>in</strong>...- (2001) Task-Based <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Long, M.H.,Adams, L., McLean, M. and Castanos, F. (1976) “Do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs with words: verbal<strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> lockstep and small group classroom situations.” On TESOL. ‘76 ed. byJ.F. Fanselow and R. Crymes, 137-153. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC:TESOL.