English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BEYOND METHODS 1754 What should I emphasize?5 How should I change?6 How am I do<strong>in</strong>g?Learners decide to give priority to speciall<strong>in</strong>guistic items.Learners decide to change their approach tolanguage learn<strong>in</strong>g.Learners determ<strong>in</strong>e how well they use thelanguage and diagnose their needs.7 What am I gett<strong>in</strong>g out of this? Learners determ<strong>in</strong>e if an activity or strategyis useful.8 How am I responsible for learn<strong>in</strong>g?How is language learn<strong>in</strong>g affect<strong>in</strong>gme?Learners make judgments about how tolearn a language and about what languagelearn<strong>in</strong>g is like.O’Malley et al. have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the use of strategies by ESL learners both <strong>in</strong> and out ofclassrooms (O’Malley et al. 1985a, b; O’Malley and Chamot 1989). ESL students and theirteachers were <strong>in</strong>terviewed about the strategies learners used on specific language learn<strong>in</strong>gtasks, and the learners were observed <strong>in</strong> ESL classrooms.They were also asked about theiruse of <strong>English</strong> <strong>in</strong> communicative situations outside the classroom. A total of twenty-sixdifferent k<strong>in</strong>ds of learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies were identified.In a follow-up study, high school ESL students were given tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the use ofparticular strategies <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e if it would improve their effectiveness as languagelearners and their performance on vocabulary, listen<strong>in</strong>g, and speak<strong>in</strong>g tasks. Strategies werecompared across proficiency levels and with learners of different language backgrounds.Students were given tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the use of specific strategies for particular language learn<strong>in</strong>gtasks. Results supported the notion that learners can be taught to use more effective learn<strong>in</strong>gstrategies (O’Malley et al. 1985a, b):Strategies tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was successfully demonstrated <strong>in</strong> a natural teach<strong>in</strong>g environmentwith second language listen<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g tasks. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that classrooms<strong>in</strong>struction on learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies with <strong>in</strong>tegrative language skills can facilitate learn<strong>in</strong>g.(O’Malley et a]. 1985a: 577)Phillips ( 1975) <strong>in</strong>vestigated how learners approach read<strong>in</strong>g tasks and identified strategiesemployed by good and poor readers. She employed a “th<strong>in</strong>k-aloud” procedure to <strong>in</strong>vestigatereaders’ strategies <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g with unknown vocabulary. From her students’ descriptionsPhillips found that strategies used by efficient readers <strong>in</strong>cluded categoriz<strong>in</strong>g wordsgrammatically, <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g grammatical operations, and recogniz<strong>in</strong>g cognates and rootwords. Hosenfeld (1 977, 1984) used similar techniques <strong>in</strong> study<strong>in</strong>g processes employed byforeign language readers when encounter<strong>in</strong>g unfamiliar words. In one study (Hosenfeld1977), some of the differences between those with high and low scores on a read<strong>in</strong>gproficiency test were these: High scorers tended to keep the mean<strong>in</strong>g of the passage <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d,read <strong>in</strong> broad phrases, skip unessential words, and guess mean<strong>in</strong>gs of unknown wordsfrom context; low scorers tended to lose the mean<strong>in</strong>g of sentences as soon as they decodedthem, read word by word or <strong>in</strong> short phrases, rarely skip words, and turn to the glossarywhen they encountered new words. In addition successful readers tended to identify thcgrammatical categories of words, could detect word-order differences <strong>in</strong> the foreignlanguage, recognized cognates, and used the glossary only as a last resort (Hosenfcld 1984:233). Hosenfeld found that unsuccessful readers could be taught the lexical strategies of