12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 JACK C. RICHARDS<strong>in</strong>formation, and construct new concepts” (p. 4). Furthermore, to be functionally proficient<strong>in</strong> the classroom, the student must be able to utili7e these compctences to perform threemajor functions: (a) to decode and understand both task expectations and new <strong>in</strong>formation;(b) to engage appropriately <strong>in</strong> complet<strong>in</strong>g tasks, with high accuracy; and (c) to obta<strong>in</strong>accurate feedback with relation to complet<strong>in</strong>g tasks accurately (p. 5).In his Significant Bil<strong>in</strong>gual Instructional Features (SBIF) descriptive study, Tikunoff(1 983) collected data to f<strong>in</strong>d out how effective teachers <strong>in</strong> bil<strong>in</strong>gual education programsorganize <strong>in</strong>struction, structure teach<strong>in</strong>g activities, and enhance student performance ontasks. Teachers were <strong>in</strong>terviewed to determ<strong>in</strong>e their <strong>in</strong>structional philosophies, goals, andthe demands they would structure <strong>in</strong>to class tasks. Teachers were clearly able to specify classtask demands and <strong>in</strong>tended outcomes and to <strong>in</strong>dicate what LEP students had to do to befunctionally proficient. Case studies of teachers were undertaken <strong>in</strong> which teachers wereobserved dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struction, with three observers collect<strong>in</strong>g data for the teacher and forfour target LEP students. Teachers were <strong>in</strong>terviewed aga<strong>in</strong> after <strong>in</strong>struction.An analysis of data across the case studies revealed a clear l<strong>in</strong>kage between (1) teachers’ability to clearly specify the <strong>in</strong>tent of <strong>in</strong>struction, and a belief that students couldachieve accuracy <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional tasks, (2) the organization and delivery of <strong>in</strong>structionsuch that tasks and <strong>in</strong>stitutional demands reflected this <strong>in</strong>tent, requir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tendedstudent responses, and (3) the fidelity of student eonsequences with <strong>in</strong>tendedoutcomes. In other words, teachers were able to describe clearly what <strong>in</strong>structionwould entail, to operationalize these specifications, and to produce the desired results<strong>in</strong> terms of student performance. (p. 9)This approach to teach<strong>in</strong>g is one <strong>in</strong> which methodological pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are developed fromstudy<strong>in</strong>g the classroom practices and processes actually cmployed by effective teachers.Good teach<strong>in</strong>g is not viewed as someth<strong>in</strong>g that results from us<strong>in</strong>g Method X or MethodY,or someth<strong>in</strong>g that results from the teacher modify<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g behaviors to match someexternal sct of rules and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. Rather, it results from the teacher’s active control andmanagement of the processes of teach<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g, and communication with<strong>in</strong> the classroomand from an understand<strong>in</strong>g of these processes.The classroom is seen as a place where thereis ongo<strong>in</strong>g and dynamic <strong>in</strong>teraction between the teacher’s <strong>in</strong>structional goals, learners’purposes, classroom tasks and activities, the teacher’s <strong>in</strong>structional activities and behaviors,student behaviors <strong>in</strong> complet<strong>in</strong>g assigned tasks, and learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.In the bil<strong>in</strong>gual classrooms observed <strong>in</strong> Tikunoff’s study, effective teach<strong>in</strong>g was foundto reflect the degree to which the teacher is able to successfully communicate his or her<strong>in</strong>tentions, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> students’ engagement <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional tasks, and monitor students’performance on tasks. In classrooms where different <strong>in</strong>structional goals are present anddifferent aspects of second language proficiency arc be<strong>in</strong>g addressed, the characteristics ofeffective teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> those sett<strong>in</strong>gs cannot be <strong>in</strong>ferred merely from read<strong>in</strong>g about thetheoretical pr<strong>in</strong>ciples underly<strong>in</strong>g the method or approach the teacher is supposed to befollow<strong>in</strong>g. Rather, classroom observation of teachers who arc achiev<strong>in</strong>g higher-thanpredictedlevels of achievement <strong>in</strong> their learners, or who are assessed as perform<strong>in</strong>g at highlevels of effectiveness accord<strong>in</strong>g to other criteria, provides the data from which profiles ofeffective teachers <strong>in</strong> listen<strong>in</strong>g, read<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g, speak<strong>in</strong>g, and other k<strong>in</strong>ds of classes can bedeveloped.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!