12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BEYOND METHODS 171tak<strong>in</strong>g breaks, l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up, distribut<strong>in</strong>g books, homework, and mak<strong>in</strong>g arrangements for futureevents. Students <strong>in</strong> Teacher B’s class, however, are actively <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g for only55% of the lesson. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, studies of time-on-task have found that the more timestudents spend study<strong>in</strong>g content, the better they learn it. In one study (Stall<strong>in</strong>gs andKaskowitz 1974), the students with the highest levels of achievement <strong>in</strong> a read<strong>in</strong>g programwere spend<strong>in</strong>g about 50% more time actively engaged <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g activities than the childrenwith the lowest achievement ga<strong>in</strong>s. Good teach<strong>in</strong>g is hence said to be task oriented. Effectiveteachers also monitor performance on tasks, provid<strong>in</strong>g feedback on how well tasks havebeen completed.Group<strong>in</strong>gA related dimension of effective teachng is the group<strong>in</strong>j of learners to carry out <strong>in</strong>structionaltasks, and the relation between group<strong>in</strong>g arrangement and achievement. An effective teacherunderstands how different k<strong>in</strong>ds of group<strong>in</strong>g (such as seat work, pair work, discussion,read<strong>in</strong>g circle, or lecture) can impede or promote learn<strong>in</strong>g. Webb (1 980) found that themiddle-ability child suffers a loss of achievement, while the low-ability child shows somega<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> achievement <strong>in</strong> mixed-ability groups, compared with what would be expectedif both were <strong>in</strong> uniform-ability groups. Tikunoff (1985) cites Good and Marshall’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gson group<strong>in</strong>gs.Good and Marshall (1984) found that students <strong>in</strong> low-ability read<strong>in</strong>g groups <strong>in</strong> theearly grades received very little challenge, thus perceiv<strong>in</strong>g of themselves as unable toread. In addition, a long-range result of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g most frequently with only otherstudents of low-ability <strong>in</strong> such groups was an <strong>in</strong>ability to respond to the demands ofmore complex <strong>in</strong>structional activities. Ironically, Good po<strong>in</strong>ted out that the verystrategy used to presumably help low-ability youngsters with their read<strong>in</strong>g problems- pull-out programs <strong>in</strong> which teachers worked with small groups of these studentsoutside the regular classroom ~ exacerbated the problem. Demands <strong>in</strong> the specialread<strong>in</strong>g groups were very different from those <strong>in</strong> the regular classroom and at a muchlower level of complexity, so low-ability students were not learn<strong>in</strong>g to respond tohigh level demands that would help them participate competently <strong>in</strong> their regularclassrooms. (p. 56)The research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs suggest therefore that effective teach<strong>in</strong>g depends on such factorsas time-on-task, feedback, group<strong>in</strong>g and task decisions, classroom management, andstructur<strong>in</strong>g. Although the concept of effective teach<strong>in</strong>g evolved from studies of contentteach<strong>in</strong>g,Tikunoff’s (1 98 3) major study of effective teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> bil<strong>in</strong>gual education programshas exam<strong>in</strong>ed the extent to which it also applies to other contexts, such as bil<strong>in</strong>gual andESL classrooms.Ejective teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hil<strong>in</strong>gual classroomsTikunoff (1983) suggests that three k<strong>in</strong>ds of competence are needed for the studentof limited <strong>English</strong> proficiency (LEP): participative competence, the ability “to respondappropriately to class demands and the procedural rules for accomplish<strong>in</strong>g them” (p. 4);<strong>in</strong>teractional competence, the ability “to respond both to classroom rules of discourse and socialrules of discourse, <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g appropriately with peers and adults while accomplish<strong>in</strong>g classtasks” (p. 4); and academic competence, the ability “to acquire new skills, assimilate new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!