English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
~ (1942)~ (1987)~ (1987)~ (1~ (1~ (1THE DEVELOPMENT OF EFL METHODOLOGY 165Outl<strong>in</strong>e Guide for the Practical Study .f Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s. Baltimore: L<strong>in</strong>guisticSociety of America.Breen, M.P. (1984) ‘Process syllabuses for the language classroom’, <strong>in</strong> C.J. Brumfit (ed.),General <strong>English</strong> syllabus design. (ELT Documents No. 118, 47-60). London: PergamonPress &The British Council.‘Learner contributions to task design’, <strong>in</strong> C.N. Candl<strong>in</strong> and D. Murphy (eds)Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> Education: Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Breen, M.P. and Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. (1980) ‘The essentials of a communicative curriculum <strong>in</strong>language teach<strong>in</strong>g’. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 1 (2). 89-1 12.Canale, M. and Swa<strong>in</strong>, H. (1980) ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to secondlanguage teach<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g’. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics I /l. 1-7Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. (1984) ‘Syllabus design as a critical process’, <strong>in</strong> C.J. Brumfit (ed.) General <strong>English</strong>syllabus design. (ELT Documcnts No. 118, 29-46). London: Pergamon Press and TheBritish Council.‘Towards task-based language learn<strong>in</strong>g’, <strong>in</strong> C.N. Candl<strong>in</strong> and D. Murphy (eds)Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> Education: Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. and Murphy, D. (eds) (1987) Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong>Education:Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Chomsky, N. (1966) Aspects ofthe Theory ofsyntax. Boston: MIT Press.Curran, C.A. (1972) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g-Learn<strong>in</strong>g: A Whole-Person Model for Education. New York: Gruneand Stratton.976) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g-Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong>s. Apple River, 111. : Apple River Press.Ellis, R. (1994) The Study ofsecond <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Feez, S. (1998) Text-based Syllabus Design. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.Foster, P. (1999) ‘Task-based learn<strong>in</strong>g and pedagogy’. ELTjournal53/1. 69-70.Fries, C. (1945) <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>English</strong> us a Foreign <strong>Language</strong>. Michigan: MichiganUniversity Press.Gattengo, C. (1972) <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Schools: The Silent Way (2nd ed.). New York:Educational Solutions.976) The Common Sense of<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s. NewYork: Educational Solutions.Halliday, M.A.K. (1973) ‘Towards a sociological semantics’. Explorations <strong>in</strong> the Functions of<strong>Language</strong>. London: Edward ArnoldHartley, B. andv<strong>in</strong>e, P. (1978) Streaml<strong>in</strong>e <strong>English</strong>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Howatt, A.P.R. (1984) A History of<strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hymes, D.H. (1971) On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of PhiladelphiaPress.Kle<strong>in</strong>jans, E. (1961) ‘From Mim-Mem to Communication’. Studies <strong>in</strong> Descriptive and AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics: Bullet<strong>in</strong> ofthe Summer lnstitute <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guisticsVol 1 .Krashen, S.D. (1981) Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition and Second <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g. Oxford:Pergamon.982) Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and Practices <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford, Pergammon.Krashen, S.D. and Tcrrell, T. (1983) The Natural Approach: Languuge Acquisition <strong>in</strong> the Classroom.Oxford, Pergamon.La Forge, P.G. (1983) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g and Culture <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Lado, R. (1964) <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>:A scient$c approach. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986) Techniques and Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Long, M.H. (1991) ‘Focus on form: A dcsign feature <strong>in</strong> language teach<strong>in</strong>g methodology’, <strong>in</strong>