12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~ (1942)~ (1987)~ (1987)~ (1~ (1~ (1THE DEVELOPMENT OF EFL METHODOLOGY 165Outl<strong>in</strong>e Guide for the Practical Study .f Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s. Baltimore: L<strong>in</strong>guisticSociety of America.Breen, M.P. (1984) ‘Process syllabuses for the language classroom’, <strong>in</strong> C.J. Brumfit (ed.),General <strong>English</strong> syllabus design. (ELT Documents No. 118, 47-60). London: PergamonPress &The British Council.‘Learner contributions to task design’, <strong>in</strong> C.N. Candl<strong>in</strong> and D. Murphy (eds)Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> Education: Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Breen, M.P. and Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. (1980) ‘The essentials of a communicative curriculum <strong>in</strong>language teach<strong>in</strong>g’. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 1 (2). 89-1 12.Canale, M. and Swa<strong>in</strong>, H. (1980) ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to secondlanguage teach<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g’. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics I /l. 1-7Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. (1984) ‘Syllabus design as a critical process’, <strong>in</strong> C.J. Brumfit (ed.) General <strong>English</strong>syllabus design. (ELT Documcnts No. 118, 29-46). London: Pergamon Press and TheBritish Council.‘Towards task-based language learn<strong>in</strong>g’, <strong>in</strong> C.N. Candl<strong>in</strong> and D. Murphy (eds)Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> Education: Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Candl<strong>in</strong>, C.N. and Murphy, D. (eds) (1987) Lancaster Practical Papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong>Education:Vol 7. <strong>Language</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Chomsky, N. (1966) Aspects ofthe Theory ofsyntax. Boston: MIT Press.Curran, C.A. (1972) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g-Learn<strong>in</strong>g: A Whole-Person Model for Education. New York: Gruneand Stratton.976) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g-Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong>s. Apple River, 111. : Apple River Press.Ellis, R. (1994) The Study ofsecond <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Feez, S. (1998) Text-based Syllabus Design. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.Foster, P. (1999) ‘Task-based learn<strong>in</strong>g and pedagogy’. ELTjournal53/1. 69-70.Fries, C. (1945) <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>English</strong> us a Foreign <strong>Language</strong>. Michigan: MichiganUniversity Press.Gattengo, C. (1972) <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Schools: The Silent Way (2nd ed.). New York:Educational Solutions.976) The Common Sense of<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s. NewYork: Educational Solutions.Halliday, M.A.K. (1973) ‘Towards a sociological semantics’. Explorations <strong>in</strong> the Functions of<strong>Language</strong>. London: Edward ArnoldHartley, B. andv<strong>in</strong>e, P. (1978) Streaml<strong>in</strong>e <strong>English</strong>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Howatt, A.P.R. (1984) A History of<strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hymes, D.H. (1971) On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of PhiladelphiaPress.Kle<strong>in</strong>jans, E. (1961) ‘From Mim-Mem to Communication’. Studies <strong>in</strong> Descriptive and AppliedL<strong>in</strong>guistics: Bullet<strong>in</strong> ofthe Summer lnstitute <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guisticsVol 1 .Krashen, S.D. (1981) Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition and Second <strong>Language</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g. Oxford:Pergamon.982) Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and Practices <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford, Pergammon.Krashen, S.D. and Tcrrell, T. (1983) The Natural Approach: Languuge Acquisition <strong>in</strong> the Classroom.Oxford, Pergamon.La Forge, P.G. (1983) Counsel<strong>in</strong>g and Culture <strong>in</strong> Second <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Lado, R. (1964) <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>:A scient$c approach. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986) Techniques and Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Long, M.H. (1991) ‘Focus on form: A dcsign feature <strong>in</strong> language teach<strong>in</strong>g methodology’, <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!