12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SOCIAL CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING 133our <strong>in</strong>itial arrival challenged. In other words, we may uncover more precisely the “rulesof the game” which represent the self-ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g culture of that particular workmg group.The culture of the classroom is jo<strong>in</strong>tk constructedWhilst we may accept the truism that all knowledge is socially constructed ~ most especiallyif we arc work<strong>in</strong>g with the knowledge of a language and how it is used between people ~we need to consider how classrooms re-construct knowledge. In a language class, theclassroom group together not only freshly evolves the new language (the content of lessons),but together also jo<strong>in</strong>tly constructs the lessons (the social procedures of teach<strong>in</strong>g andlearn<strong>in</strong>g). Whether or not the teacher plans a lesson <strong>in</strong> advance, the actual work<strong>in</strong>g out ofthat lesson <strong>in</strong> the class demands jo<strong>in</strong>t endeavour.The lesson-<strong>in</strong>-process is most often differentfrom that which either the teacher or the learners anticipated before the lesson began.Thesocial dynamic of the group <strong>in</strong>sists that lessons evolve, through explicit or implicitnegotiation. In whatever ways the lesson may be perceived by those who participate <strong>in</strong> it,the route it takes will be drawn by the jo<strong>in</strong>t contributions of most, if not all, of the membersof the class. Teachers and learners are well aware that lessons are rarely straightforwardjourneys but are punctuated by hesitant starts, diversions, momentary losses of momentum,<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g side tracks, and unexpected breakdowns. That it may be better to plan classroomlearn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> advance has little to do with this entirely normal and creative evolution oflessons.”Several important implications for the researcher result from the fact that the contentand process of language classes are jo<strong>in</strong>tly constructed. First, any teacher-centred (orresearcher-centred) perspective on lessons is partial. Second, the researcher’s backgroundknowledge of the actual language be<strong>in</strong>g worked upon <strong>in</strong> a class can be a serious handicapbecause it potentially bl<strong>in</strong>ds us to the process of re-<strong>in</strong>vention of that language which teacherand taught engage <strong>in</strong> together. (This implication warns us aga<strong>in</strong>st rely<strong>in</strong>g on externall<strong>in</strong>guistic criteria alone <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g the nature of comprehensible <strong>in</strong>put, for example.) Theproblem rem<strong>in</strong>ds us of a similar gap between the teacher’s def<strong>in</strong>ition of the new languageand the different learners’ def<strong>in</strong>itions. There are likely to be as many versions of the newlanguage, and chang<strong>in</strong>g versions of it, as there are people <strong>in</strong> the room.Third, the researcherhas to be cont<strong>in</strong>ually wary of be<strong>in</strong>g dazzled by what seems salient <strong>in</strong> classroom life. Forexample, even the most passive or non-contributory learner <strong>in</strong> a class can be a poltergeiston the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Silence, encouraged or not, is a characteristic part of the culture of theclassroom and it has grcat significance. Silence or withdrawal can change a lesson just aspowerfully as their opposites, and not just for thc person who withdraws, but also for allthe others who sense it.The fourth implication of the jo<strong>in</strong>t construction of the content andprocess of a language class is particularly significant for researchers who wish to exam<strong>in</strong>ethe effects of classroom language learn<strong>in</strong>g. The fact that lessons-<strong>in</strong>-process are communalendeavours means that any learn<strong>in</strong>g outcome, for any member of the class, has been sociallyprocessed. The actual nature of <strong>in</strong>dividual achievements has been communally moulded.The culture of the classroom <strong>in</strong>evitably mediates between a new language and a learner <strong>in</strong>class. The culture of a particular class will shape what is made available for learn<strong>in</strong>g, willwork upon what is made available <strong>in</strong> particular ways, will evolve <strong>its</strong> own criteria for progressand achievement, and will atta<strong>in</strong> specific and various objectives. (It is worth emphasis<strong>in</strong>ghere that l<strong>in</strong>guistic <strong>in</strong>put is only a part of the first of these classroom-based phenomena.)What someone learns <strong>in</strong> a language class will be a dynamic synthesis of <strong>in</strong>dividualand collective experience. Individual def<strong>in</strong>itions of the new language, of what is to beattended to as worth learn<strong>in</strong>g, of how to learn, and personal def<strong>in</strong>itions of progress will all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!