12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132 MICHAEL P. BREENfor a time ~ different views of what should be happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a class and what should not.This suggests that, although the nature of <strong>in</strong>terpersonal and <strong>in</strong>tergroup relationships with<strong>in</strong>the language classroom may be complex and chang<strong>in</strong>g, the researcher needs to uncoverwhat these are if we wish to describe what happens <strong>in</strong> the class and further <strong>in</strong>terpret thisas it is experienced by those with<strong>in</strong> the class. As researchers <strong>in</strong> the past, we have tended tobe teacher-centred <strong>in</strong> our assum<strong>in</strong>g that the major asymmetry <strong>in</strong> role and identity, and thelikely location of dissonance <strong>in</strong> perceptions and effects, resides between the teacher andthe rest. We have also perhaps undcrcstimated the possible effects ~ both negative andpositive ~ of asymmetry and dissonance with<strong>in</strong> the classroom upon the language learn<strong>in</strong>gprocess.”The culture of the classroom is <strong>in</strong>herently conservativePerhaps one of the best ways of reveal<strong>in</strong>g the establishcd culture of the classroom group isto try to <strong>in</strong>troduce an <strong>in</strong>novation which the majority neither expects nor def<strong>in</strong>es asappropriate. Most teachers have had direct experience of the effort to be radical <strong>in</strong> theirapproach with a class (be it through different material, tasks, or procedure, etc.) and havesuffered the experience of at least <strong>in</strong>itial rejection. A genu<strong>in</strong>e culture is one <strong>in</strong> which <strong>its</strong>members seek security and relative harmony <strong>in</strong> a self-satisfactory milieu. As such th<strong>in</strong>gstake time to develop, anyth<strong>in</strong>g which the group perceives as change will also take time tobe absorbed or it will be resisted as deviant. (This does not mean that harmony willnecessarily reign <strong>in</strong> the classroom, for even apparent anarchy ~ as long as it is the preferredethos of that group ~ may be quite consistent with a def<strong>in</strong>ition of classroom life for someseem<strong>in</strong>gly unsocialiscd collection of learners!). In essence, a classroom group seeks aparticular social and emotional equilibrium just as soon as it can - even one which mayseem to be antithetical to learn<strong>in</strong>g. It will subsequently resist any threat to the newlyestablished order.The <strong>in</strong>dividual lcarncr risks ostracisation from the group if he does not ~overtly at least ~ conform, and the teacher risks rebellion <strong>in</strong> various forms if he does nothonour the conventions expected by the collective def<strong>in</strong>ition of what a language teachershould be. Although this conservative spirit has <strong>its</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the prior educationalexperiences of the learners, each new classroom group re<strong>in</strong>vents “the rules of the game”<strong>in</strong>ways which both reflect and form the classroom-culture assumptions of the particularparticipants who are suddenly shar<strong>in</strong>g each others’ company. It has to be said, of course,that a teacher may participate <strong>in</strong> this conservatism and, <strong>in</strong>deed, work through it <strong>in</strong> order tohelp develop group harmony, security and efficient ways of work<strong>in</strong>g. And teachers arecerta<strong>in</strong>ly familiar with the dilemma of wish<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>novate whilst be<strong>in</strong>g cautious ofdisruption. This means that the very presence of a researcher, or even the awareness with<strong>in</strong>the group that they are the focus of apparently objective evaluation and study will mobilisechange. Our personal experience of hav<strong>in</strong>g someone visit our home for the first timc andthen look<strong>in</strong>g at it with them, as if see<strong>in</strong>g it through their eyes, can rem<strong>in</strong>d us of the effectof <strong>in</strong>trusion. In a sense, the classroom changes <strong>in</strong> the eyes of those with<strong>in</strong> it and, therefore,will change <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> ways.This is, of course, the truism of observer effect. But there is alsothe observer’s paradox <strong>in</strong> that the classroom we now sec will be <strong>in</strong> a state of disequilibrium:it will not be the same classroom as yesterday and we will be <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g a classroom groupwhich is newly adapt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a number of subtle ways. This phenomenon can be either badnews or good news for the researcher. It will render short-term, one-shot <strong>in</strong>vestigations<strong>in</strong>to classroom language learn<strong>in</strong>g largely <strong>in</strong>valid and unreliable. If, on the other hand, weapproach studies of classroom language learn<strong>in</strong>g on a longitud<strong>in</strong>al basis, then we may beable to explore the process of re-establishment of social and emotional cquilibrium which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!