English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
132 MICHAEL P. BREENfor a time ~ different views of what should be happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a class and what should not.This suggests that, although the nature of <strong>in</strong>terpersonal and <strong>in</strong>tergroup relationships with<strong>in</strong>the language classroom may be complex and chang<strong>in</strong>g, the researcher needs to uncoverwhat these are if we wish to describe what happens <strong>in</strong> the class and further <strong>in</strong>terpret thisas it is experienced by those with<strong>in</strong> the class. As researchers <strong>in</strong> the past, we have tended tobe teacher-centred <strong>in</strong> our assum<strong>in</strong>g that the major asymmetry <strong>in</strong> role and identity, and thelikely location of dissonance <strong>in</strong> perceptions and effects, resides between the teacher andthe rest. We have also perhaps undcrcstimated the possible effects ~ both negative andpositive ~ of asymmetry and dissonance with<strong>in</strong> the classroom upon the language learn<strong>in</strong>gprocess.”The culture of the classroom is <strong>in</strong>herently conservativePerhaps one of the best ways of reveal<strong>in</strong>g the establishcd culture of the classroom group isto try to <strong>in</strong>troduce an <strong>in</strong>novation which the majority neither expects nor def<strong>in</strong>es asappropriate. Most teachers have had direct experience of the effort to be radical <strong>in</strong> theirapproach with a class (be it through different material, tasks, or procedure, etc.) and havesuffered the experience of at least <strong>in</strong>itial rejection. A genu<strong>in</strong>e culture is one <strong>in</strong> which <strong>its</strong>members seek security and relative harmony <strong>in</strong> a self-satisfactory milieu. As such th<strong>in</strong>gstake time to develop, anyth<strong>in</strong>g which the group perceives as change will also take time tobe absorbed or it will be resisted as deviant. (This does not mean that harmony willnecessarily reign <strong>in</strong> the classroom, for even apparent anarchy ~ as long as it is the preferredethos of that group ~ may be quite consistent with a def<strong>in</strong>ition of classroom life for someseem<strong>in</strong>gly unsocialiscd collection of learners!). In essence, a classroom group seeks aparticular social and emotional equilibrium just as soon as it can - even one which mayseem to be antithetical to learn<strong>in</strong>g. It will subsequently resist any threat to the newlyestablished order.The <strong>in</strong>dividual lcarncr risks ostracisation from the group if he does not ~overtly at least ~ conform, and the teacher risks rebellion <strong>in</strong> various forms if he does nothonour the conventions expected by the collective def<strong>in</strong>ition of what a language teachershould be. Although this conservative spirit has <strong>its</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the prior educationalexperiences of the learners, each new classroom group re<strong>in</strong>vents “the rules of the game”<strong>in</strong>ways which both reflect and form the classroom-culture assumptions of the particularparticipants who are suddenly shar<strong>in</strong>g each others’ company. It has to be said, of course,that a teacher may participate <strong>in</strong> this conservatism and, <strong>in</strong>deed, work through it <strong>in</strong> order tohelp develop group harmony, security and efficient ways of work<strong>in</strong>g. And teachers arecerta<strong>in</strong>ly familiar with the dilemma of wish<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>novate whilst be<strong>in</strong>g cautious ofdisruption. This means that the very presence of a researcher, or even the awareness with<strong>in</strong>the group that they are the focus of apparently objective evaluation and study will mobilisechange. Our personal experience of hav<strong>in</strong>g someone visit our home for the first timc andthen look<strong>in</strong>g at it with them, as if see<strong>in</strong>g it through their eyes, can rem<strong>in</strong>d us of the effectof <strong>in</strong>trusion. In a sense, the classroom changes <strong>in</strong> the eyes of those with<strong>in</strong> it and, therefore,will change <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> ways.This is, of course, the truism of observer effect. But there is alsothe observer’s paradox <strong>in</strong> that the classroom we now sec will be <strong>in</strong> a state of disequilibrium:it will not be the same classroom as yesterday and we will be <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g a classroom groupwhich is newly adapt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a number of subtle ways. This phenomenon can be either badnews or good news for the researcher. It will render short-term, one-shot <strong>in</strong>vestigations<strong>in</strong>to classroom language learn<strong>in</strong>g largely <strong>in</strong>valid and unreliable. If, on the other hand, weapproach studies of classroom language learn<strong>in</strong>g on a longitud<strong>in</strong>al basis, then we may beable to explore the process of re-establishment of social and emotional cquilibrium which