English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE SOCIAL CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING 131Learners <strong>in</strong> a class will obviously vary with regard to their relative dependence upon externaland <strong>in</strong>ternal criteria. However, one of the prevalent features of the culture of the classroomis the establishment of overt and covert criteria aga<strong>in</strong>st which <strong>its</strong> members are cont<strong>in</strong>uallyjudged. In other words, the culture of the classroom re+ the persons who participatewith<strong>in</strong> it <strong>in</strong>to “good” learners and “bad” learners, “good” teachers and “bad” teachers,“beg<strong>in</strong>ners,”“advanced,”“high” participators and “low” participators, etc., etc. Put bluntly,the language class is a highly normative and evaluative environment which engages teacherand taught <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ual judgement of each other, less as persons, but as members whoare supposed to learn and a member who is supposed to teach. This highly normativecharacteristic of classroom life implies for the researcher that we need to discover the overtand covert group criteria (and members’ <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>terpretations of these criteria) aga<strong>in</strong>stwhich learn<strong>in</strong>g behaviour and progress are judged. To <strong>in</strong>fer, for example, that a teacher’serror corrections are consistently based upon objective l<strong>in</strong>guistic criteria or are otherwiseapparently random would lead to a superficial analysis of phenomena which, though opaque,are deeply significant for a teacher and learners <strong>in</strong> the particular classroom.The culture of the classroom is asymmetricalBecause teachers are expected to know what learners are expected not to know, certa<strong>in</strong>social and psychological consequences <strong>in</strong>evitably obta<strong>in</strong> for the human relationships <strong>in</strong> theclass. The culture of the classroom <strong>in</strong>sists upon asymmetrical relationships. The duties andrights of teacher and taught are different. More significantly, both teacher and taught maybe equally reluctant to upset the asymmetry of roles and identities to which these duties andrights are assigned. In most societies - perhaps all, despite some relative variation ~ anegalitarian relationship between teacher and taught is a contradiction of what a classroomshould be. Teachers and learners are very familiar with the experience of graduallyestablish<strong>in</strong>g the precise degree of asymmetry which enables them to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a relativelyharmonious work<strong>in</strong>g group. As teachers, we are also familiar with a class which erodes whatthey perceive as be<strong>in</strong>g too democratic or too authoritarian an approach on our part, eventhough we ourselves may perceive our teach<strong>in</strong>g style as consistently someth<strong>in</strong>g else entirely!Here is a paradox. Learners give a teacher the right to adopt a role and identity of teacher.And a teacher has to earn particular rights and duties <strong>in</strong> the eyes of the learn<strong>in</strong>g group.However, the history of the tribe marches beh<strong>in</strong>d the teacher, and a teacher through theunfold<strong>in</strong>g culture of the particular classroom group will similarly allocate rights and dutiesto learners. Indeed, one of the rights and duties of a teacher is to do precisely that! However,asymmetrical relationships do not only exist between teacher and taught. Sub-group<strong>in</strong>gswhch are asymmetrical with the dom<strong>in</strong>ant classroom culture also emerge and prosper, suchas anti-academic peer group<strong>in</strong>gs or certa<strong>in</strong> learners who identify themselves as moresuccessful or less successful and even groups who share a common identity (such asfriendship groups) outside the classroom. Thus, not only is the culture of the classroom<strong>in</strong>dividually differentiated yet collective, it is also made up of subgroups which develop forthemselves ma<strong>in</strong>ly covert, though sometimes overtly expressed, roles and identities whichare potentially asymmetrical with both the dom<strong>in</strong>ant culture and with other sub-group<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong> the class.Asymmetry of roles and identities, and of the rights and duties they bear, derives fromand further generates conceptual and affective dissonances. Asymmetrical relationships veryoftcn entail disagreement <strong>in</strong> beliefs, <strong>in</strong> attitudes, and <strong>in</strong> values held. The collective natureof the classroom culture and the negotiated compromises which permeate the teach<strong>in</strong>glearn<strong>in</strong>gprocess often hide with<strong>in</strong> themselves ~ sometimes with difficulty and often only