12.07.2015 Views

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

English Language Teaching in its Social Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~ isTHE SOCIAL CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING 129The culture of the classroom is <strong>in</strong>teractiveThe language class <strong>in</strong>volves all <strong>its</strong> participants <strong>in</strong> verbal and non-verbal <strong>in</strong>teraction of certa<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>ds. This <strong>in</strong>teraction exists on a cont<strong>in</strong>uum from ritualised, predictable, phaticcommunication to dynamic, unpredictable, diversely <strong>in</strong>terpreted communication. Ofcourse, human <strong>in</strong>teraction will be relatively located on this k<strong>in</strong>d of cont<strong>in</strong>uum <strong>in</strong> all socialsituations. One special characteristic of classroom <strong>in</strong>teraction, however, is that it is motivatedby the assumption that people can learn together <strong>in</strong> a group.This mean3 that a high premiumis placed upon consensus whilst misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs, alternative <strong>in</strong>terpretations, andnegotiable mean<strong>in</strong>g will paradoxically be the norm, and from which participants will seekto make their own sense and upon which participants will impose their own purposes.Thisis not to say that the observable <strong>in</strong>teraction will not be patterned or constra<strong>in</strong>ed, but thatit is very likely to be patterned differently <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> it by each person<strong>in</strong> the class. Therefore the researcher needs to be wary of assum<strong>in</strong>g that the patterns of<strong>in</strong>teraction which wc perceive as significant have the same salience for both teacher andtaught. A special characteristic of the language class is that <strong>in</strong>teraction is further motivatedby the assumption that people can objectify a language and talk about it and analysc it <strong>in</strong>ways they may not naturally do if left alone. The language class implies metal<strong>in</strong>guistic<strong>in</strong>teraction. However, it is often further assumed that the language class can provideopportunities for genu<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>teraction through the new language code. A language classentails <strong>in</strong>teraction about language and <strong>in</strong>teraction through languages <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ualjuxtaposition.All these and other characteristics of the <strong>in</strong>teractive process of the language class mayor may not be efficient or optimal for language learn<strong>in</strong>g. However, all represent the <strong>in</strong>herentauthenticity of the <strong>in</strong>teraction with<strong>in</strong> a language class given the external constra<strong>in</strong>ts of space,time, participation, etc., which typify any classroom devoted to any subject matter.A significant paradox for the language teacher ~ a paradox of which teachers are well awarethat the established <strong>in</strong>teraction which is evolved and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by the culture of theclassroom group often conflicts with efforts towards communication through the newlanguage. Communication <strong>in</strong> the new language requires the temporary suspension of thosecultural conventions govern<strong>in</strong>g the everyday <strong>in</strong>teraction of the particular classroom group.It requires communication which is, <strong>in</strong> fact, <strong>in</strong>authentic to the <strong>in</strong>teractive context <strong>in</strong>which it has to occur. This implies that one of the conventions assumed to be honoured byparticipants <strong>in</strong> the culture of a language class is the will<strong>in</strong>gness and capacity to suspenddisbelief, to participate <strong>in</strong> simulated communication with<strong>in</strong> classroom specific <strong>in</strong>teraction.’The culture of the classroom is diflerentiatedAlthough the language class may be one social situation, it is a different social context for allthose who participate with<strong>in</strong> it.The culture of the classroom is an amalgam and permutationof different social realities.This means that the content of lessons (the language be<strong>in</strong>g taught)and the procedures of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g (the th<strong>in</strong>gs be<strong>in</strong>g done) are both cont<strong>in</strong>ually<strong>in</strong>terpreted differently as the life of that language class unfolds.The classroom is the meet<strong>in</strong>gpo<strong>in</strong>t of various subjective views of language, diverse learn<strong>in</strong>g purposes, and differentpreferences concern<strong>in</strong>g how learn<strong>in</strong>g should be done. Such differentiation br<strong>in</strong>gs with itpotential for disagreement, frustrated expectations, and conflict. The culture of theclassroom docs not erase thcsc differences; it conta<strong>in</strong>s them. A major challenge for teacherand learners is the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of a f<strong>in</strong>e balance between conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal social realities(a k<strong>in</strong>d of subjective anarchy!) and an external reality which has to be cont<strong>in</strong>ually negotiated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!