English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
English Language Teaching in its Social Context
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
~ isTHE SOCIAL CONTEXT FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING 129The culture of the classroom is <strong>in</strong>teractiveThe language class <strong>in</strong>volves all <strong>its</strong> participants <strong>in</strong> verbal and non-verbal <strong>in</strong>teraction of certa<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>ds. This <strong>in</strong>teraction exists on a cont<strong>in</strong>uum from ritualised, predictable, phaticcommunication to dynamic, unpredictable, diversely <strong>in</strong>terpreted communication. Ofcourse, human <strong>in</strong>teraction will be relatively located on this k<strong>in</strong>d of cont<strong>in</strong>uum <strong>in</strong> all socialsituations. One special characteristic of classroom <strong>in</strong>teraction, however, is that it is motivatedby the assumption that people can learn together <strong>in</strong> a group.This mean3 that a high premiumis placed upon consensus whilst misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs, alternative <strong>in</strong>terpretations, andnegotiable mean<strong>in</strong>g will paradoxically be the norm, and from which participants will seekto make their own sense and upon which participants will impose their own purposes.Thisis not to say that the observable <strong>in</strong>teraction will not be patterned or constra<strong>in</strong>ed, but thatit is very likely to be patterned differently <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> it by each person<strong>in</strong> the class. Therefore the researcher needs to be wary of assum<strong>in</strong>g that the patterns of<strong>in</strong>teraction which wc perceive as significant have the same salience for both teacher andtaught. A special characteristic of the language class is that <strong>in</strong>teraction is further motivatedby the assumption that people can objectify a language and talk about it and analysc it <strong>in</strong>ways they may not naturally do if left alone. The language class implies metal<strong>in</strong>guistic<strong>in</strong>teraction. However, it is often further assumed that the language class can provideopportunities for genu<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>teraction through the new language code. A language classentails <strong>in</strong>teraction about language and <strong>in</strong>teraction through languages <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ualjuxtaposition.All these and other characteristics of the <strong>in</strong>teractive process of the language class mayor may not be efficient or optimal for language learn<strong>in</strong>g. However, all represent the <strong>in</strong>herentauthenticity of the <strong>in</strong>teraction with<strong>in</strong> a language class given the external constra<strong>in</strong>ts of space,time, participation, etc., which typify any classroom devoted to any subject matter.A significant paradox for the language teacher ~ a paradox of which teachers are well awarethat the established <strong>in</strong>teraction which is evolved and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by the culture of theclassroom group often conflicts with efforts towards communication through the newlanguage. Communication <strong>in</strong> the new language requires the temporary suspension of thosecultural conventions govern<strong>in</strong>g the everyday <strong>in</strong>teraction of the particular classroom group.It requires communication which is, <strong>in</strong> fact, <strong>in</strong>authentic to the <strong>in</strong>teractive context <strong>in</strong>which it has to occur. This implies that one of the conventions assumed to be honoured byparticipants <strong>in</strong> the culture of a language class is the will<strong>in</strong>gness and capacity to suspenddisbelief, to participate <strong>in</strong> simulated communication with<strong>in</strong> classroom specific <strong>in</strong>teraction.’The culture of the classroom is diflerentiatedAlthough the language class may be one social situation, it is a different social context for allthose who participate with<strong>in</strong> it.The culture of the classroom is an amalgam and permutationof different social realities.This means that the content of lessons (the language be<strong>in</strong>g taught)and the procedures of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g (the th<strong>in</strong>gs be<strong>in</strong>g done) are both cont<strong>in</strong>ually<strong>in</strong>terpreted differently as the life of that language class unfolds.The classroom is the meet<strong>in</strong>gpo<strong>in</strong>t of various subjective views of language, diverse learn<strong>in</strong>g purposes, and differentpreferences concern<strong>in</strong>g how learn<strong>in</strong>g should be done. Such differentiation br<strong>in</strong>gs with itpotential for disagreement, frustrated expectations, and conflict. The culture of theclassroom docs not erase thcsc differences; it conta<strong>in</strong>s them. A major challenge for teacherand learners is the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of a f<strong>in</strong>e balance between conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal social realities(a k<strong>in</strong>d of subjective anarchy!) and an external reality which has to be cont<strong>in</strong>ually negotiated.