12.07.2015 Views

Irrigated cereal production put to the test - Greenmount Press

Irrigated cereal production put to the test - Greenmount Press

Irrigated cereal production put to the test - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The money endThese Super Crop demonstrations have revealed that <strong>the</strong> dollarreturn per hectare can be improved through this style of highin<strong>put</strong> <strong>production</strong> system. The dollar return per megalitre can alsobe enhanced.Table 2 shows that <strong>the</strong> highest yielding irrigated crop in a verydifficult 2005 season was 8.0 <strong>to</strong>nnes per hectare. Coupled witha very low commodity price, <strong>the</strong> gross margin was much lowerthan <strong>the</strong> previous season at $357 per hectare.But on a positive note a return per megalitre of $178 wasstill achieved. This is a very encouraging figure as it suggestsvery strongly that as we refine our high in<strong>put</strong> crop establishmentand agronomy — and with access <strong>to</strong> higher yielding, high in<strong>put</strong><strong>cereal</strong> varieties — a return of between $300–$500 per megalitreis achievable.There is also <strong>the</strong> rotational benefit <strong>to</strong> following crops <strong>to</strong> beconsidered.The Cot<strong>to</strong>n Catchment Communities CRC will fur<strong>the</strong>r investigate<strong>the</strong> benefits of high in<strong>put</strong>/irrigated wheat <strong>production</strong>.This article first appeared in Australian Grain March–April 2006, andwas contributed by Cot<strong>to</strong>n Growers Services.For more information contact Donald McMurrich on 0427 799 500.TABLE 2: Cereal gross margins and returns permegalitre under <strong>the</strong> high in<strong>put</strong> <strong>production</strong> systems,2003–05Crop his<strong>to</strong>ry Cot<strong>to</strong>n 1 Fallow 2 Fallow 32003, 8.60 t/ha $180/t2004, 10.24 t/ha $175/t2005, 8.03 t/ha 145/tIncome $/ha 1548 1792 1164Variable costsEstab./seed 210 210 210Starter fertiliser 110 30 55Herbicide 20 10Plant Growth Regula<strong>to</strong>r (PGR) 21 22 22Spring nitrogen 200 172 170Fert. application &micronutrients 85 60 45Fungicides 60 60 55Irrigations x 2 100 100 100Harvesting costs 158 185 150Total variable costs ($/ha) 964 849 807Gross margin ($/ha) 584 943 357Water use (ML/ha) 2.70 1.50 2.00Return ($/ML) 216 629 178CROP HISTORY & LOCATION NOTES1 Wheat following a 2002–03 cot<strong>to</strong>n crop at Boggabri;2 Wheat following a February 2004 ploughed out cot<strong>to</strong>n cropon <strong>the</strong> Breeza Plain; and,3 Wheat following a 12 month fallow at Warren.APRIL–MAY 2006 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!