01.12.2012 Views

Algebra I: Section 6. The structure of groups. 6.1 Direct products of ...

Algebra I: Section 6. The structure of groups. 6.1 Direct products of ...

Algebra I: Section 6. The structure of groups. 6.1 Direct products of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To see why the group described in (35) is isomorphic<br />

to A4, regarded as the symmetry group <strong>of</strong> the tetrahedron<br />

T, consider the tetrahedron shown in Figure <strong>6.</strong>8<br />

with vertices labeled 1, 2, 3, 4. Any 2,2-cycle, such as<br />

(12)(34), corresponds to a 180 ◦ rotation about an axis<br />

passing through the midpoints <strong>of</strong> opposite edges. We<br />

have previously shown (Chapter 5) that the Klein Viergroup<br />

N = {e} ∪ {all three 2,2-cycles}<br />

is a normal subgroup in S4 isomorphic to Z2 × Z2. For<br />

each axis passing through a vertex and the center <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opposite face, we get a subgroup <strong>of</strong> order 3 (one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

four Sylow sub<strong>groups</strong> H3) consisting <strong>of</strong> 0 ◦ , 120 ◦ , and<br />

240 ◦ rotations about this axis. For example the subgroup<br />

{e, (123), (132)} corresponds to rotations about<br />

the axis passing through vertex 4 and the center <strong>of</strong><br />

the opposite face. With these geometric descriptions<br />

in mind, it is not hard to see how to identify elements<br />

in our abstract model (35) with the correct geometric<br />

operations on T. �<br />

Figure <strong>6.</strong>8. A regular tetrahedron<br />

centered at the origin. We show:<br />

rotation A1 by 120 ◦ about an axis<br />

through vertex 1, and B13 by 180 ◦<br />

about an axis through midpoints <strong>of</strong><br />

opposite edges.<br />

<strong>6.</strong>3.11 Exercise. Explain why the five <strong>groups</strong> G (1) , . . . , G (5) <strong>of</strong> order 12 are pairwise nonisomorphic.<br />

�<br />

We take up one last example to show that the Sylow theorems do not always yield a definitive<br />

analysis, and that as the order <strong>of</strong> G increases we begin to encounter <strong>groups</strong> that are not<br />

semidirect <strong>products</strong> – i.e. they arise as extensions e → N → G → G/N → e that do not split.<br />

<strong>6.</strong>3.12 Example (Groups <strong>of</strong> order 8). <strong>The</strong>se are all p-<strong>groups</strong> so the Sylow theorems are<br />

not much help; however by (3.2.5, 3.2.6) we know G has nontrivial center Z = Z(G), which<br />

can only have order 2, 4, 8. If |Z| = 8 the group is abelian and the possibilities are G =<br />

Z8, Z4 × Z2, Z2 × Z2 × Z2, in view <strong>of</strong> the following result.<br />

<strong>6.</strong>3.13 Lemma. If G is abelian with |G| = 8 then G is isomorphic to Z8, Z4 × Z2, or<br />

Z2 × Z2 × Z2.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>: If the maximum order <strong>of</strong> an element is o(x) = 8 then G ∼ = Z8. If the maximum is 4,<br />

say for x = a, then A = 〈a〉 ∼ = Z4. Suppose there exists some b /∈ A such that o(b) = 2. <strong>The</strong>n<br />

B = 〈b〉 ∼ = Z2 is transverse to A, A ∩ B = (e), AB = G, and since G is abelian it is a direct<br />

product ∼ = Z4 × Z2.<br />

Otherwise we have o(b) = 4 for all b /∈ A and B ∼ = Z4, but now we must have |A ∩ B| = 2<br />

(because |G| = |A|·|B| = 16 if A∩B = (e)). <strong>The</strong> only subgroup <strong>of</strong> Z4 with order 2 is {[0] 4 , [2] 4 },<br />

whose nontrivial element has order 2. That means a 2 and b 2 are the only elements <strong>of</strong> A and B<br />

<strong>of</strong> order 2, and we must have a 2 = b 2 , a −2 = a 2 , b −2 = b 2 , and A ∩ B = {e, a 2 }. Now look at<br />

the powers <strong>of</strong> the element ab: we get e, ab, (ab) 2 = a 2 b 2 = a 2 a −2 = e. Since b /∈ A ⇒ ab /∈ A we<br />

have found an element outside <strong>of</strong> A with order 2. Contradiction. This case cannot arise. �<br />

If |Z| = 4 then G/Z ∼ = Z2. Since G/Z is cyclic and Z is central in G, G must be abelian<br />

(why?). Contradiction. Thus |Z| cannot equal 4.<br />

<strong>6.</strong>3.14 Exercise. If G is a finite group and Z a subgroup such that (i) Z is central in G<br />

(zg = gz for all z ∈ Z, g ∈ G), and (ii) G/Z is cyclic, prove that G must be abelian. �<br />

Assuming |Z| = 2, let x be an element <strong>of</strong> highest order in G. We can only have o(x) = 2<br />

or 4 (G is abelian if o(x) = 8). In the first case all elements y �= e would have order 2 and<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!