From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

22 J. Lee et al.Hsieh MJ, Luo R (2004) Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction. Proteins 56(3):475–486Im W, Lee MS, Brooks CL (2003) Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function. JComput Chem 24(14):1691–1702Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, et al. (2005) FFAS03: a server for profile–profile sequencealignments. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Web Server issue):W284–288Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for templatefree targets. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):57–67Jonassen I, Klose D, Taylor WR (2006) Protein model refinement using structural fragment tessellation.Comput Biol Chem 30(5):360–366Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method forgenomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287(4):797–815Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J (1988) The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizationsfor crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc (110):1657–1666Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. (1983) Comparison of simple potential functionsfor simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am ChemSoc 118:11225–11236Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, et al. (2001) Evaluation and Reparametrization of theOPLS-AA Force Field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculationson peptides. J Phys Chem B 105:6474–6487Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov models for detecting remote proteinhomologies. Bioinformatics 14:846–856Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, et al. (2001) TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure predictionmethod that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA98(18):10125–10130Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science220(4598):671–680Klepeis JL, Floudas CA (2003) ASTRO-FOLD: a combinatorial and global optimization frameworkfor Ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acidsequence. Biophys J 85(4):2119–2146Klepeis JL, Wei Y, Hecht MH, et al. (2005) Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structureof a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study. Proteins 58(3):560–570Kocher JP, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ (1994) Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-basedpotentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235(5):1598–1613Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999a) Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models withan energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 288(3):477–487Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999b) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins35(2):133–152Lee J (1993) New Monte Carlo algorithm: entropic sampling. Phys Rev Lett 71(2):211–214Lee J, Scheraga HA, Rackovsky S (1998) Conformational analysis of the 20-residue membraneboundportion of melittin by conformational space annealing. Biopolymers 46(2):103–116Lee J, Kim SY, Joo K, et al. (2004) Prediction of protein tertiary structure using PROFESY, anovel method based on fragment assembly and conformational space annealing. Proteins56(4):704–714Lee MC, Duan Y (2004) Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a newAMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solventmodel. Proteins 55(3):620–634Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, et al. (2001) Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structureprediction. J Mol Biol 313(2):417–430Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, et al. (1995) Potential-energy function and parameters for simulationsof the molecular-dynamics of proteins and nucleic-acids in solution. Comput PhysCommun 91(1–3):215–231