12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 J. Lee et al.Table 1.1 A list of ab initio modelling algorithms reviewed in this chapter is shown along <strong>with</strong>their energy functions, conformational search methods, model selection schemes and typicalCPU time per targetAlgorithm & serveraddress Force-field type Search method Model selectionAMBER/CHARMM/OPLS (Brooks et al.1983; Weiner et al.1984; Jorgensen andTirado-Rives 1988;Duan and Kollman1998; Zagrovic et al.2002)UNRES (Liwo et al.1999, 2005; Oldziejet al. 2005)ASTRO-FOLD (Klepeisand Floudas 2003;Klepeis et al. 2005)ROSETTA (Simons et al.1997; Das et al. 2007)http://www.robetta.orgTASSER/Chunk-TASSER(Zhang and Skolnick2004a; Zhou andSkolnick 2007) http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/skolnick/webservice/MetaTASSERI-TASSER (Wu et al.2007; Zhang 2007)http://zhang.bioin-formatics.ku.edu/I-TASSERPhysics-basedPhysics-basedMoleculardynamics(MD)Conformationalspace annealing(CSA)Lowest energyClustering/freeenergyTime costper CPUYearsHoursPhysics-based αBB/CSA/MD Lowest energy MonthsMonte Carlo(MC)MCMCPhysics- andknowledgebasedKnowledgebasedClustering/freeenergyClustering/freeenergyKnowledgebasedClustering/freeenergyMonthsHoursHoursbecause the computational resources required for such calculations are far beyondwhat is available now. Without quantum mechanical treatments, a practical startingpoint for ab initio protein modelling is <strong>to</strong> use a compromised force field <strong>with</strong> a largenumber of selected a<strong>to</strong>m types; in each a<strong>to</strong>m type, the chemical and physical propertiesof the a<strong>to</strong>ms are enough alike <strong>with</strong> the parameters calculated from crystal packing orquantum mechanical theory (Hagler et al. 1974; Weiner et al. 1984). Well-knownexamples of such all-a<strong>to</strong>m physics-based force fields include AMBER (Weiner et al.1984; Cornell et al. 1995; Duan and Kollman 1998), CHARMM (Brooks et al. 1983;Neria et al. 1996; MacKerell Jr. et al. 1998), OPLS (Jorgensen and Tirado-Rives 1988;Jorgensen et al. 1996), and GROMOS96 (van Gunsteren et al. 1996). These potentialscontain terms associated <strong>with</strong> bond lengths, angles, <strong>to</strong>rsion angles, van der Waals, andelectrostatics interactions. The major difference between them lies in the selection ofa<strong>to</strong>m types and the interaction parameters.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!