12.07.2015 Views

Chromagar Staph aureus Versus Blood Agar and Mannitol Salt Agar ...

Chromagar Staph aureus Versus Blood Agar and Mannitol Salt Agar ...

Chromagar Staph aureus Versus Blood Agar and Mannitol Salt Agar ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology, January 2007 Vol. 16, No. 1the interpretation of the observer or to a truediscoloration after prolonged incubation.Whatever the cause may be, we recommendreading CSA plates after 24 h, as this gives amore accurate result. (13)The cost of CSA is higher than that ofnonselective conventional media. However,there is some efficiency gained with the useof this medium. The more rapid visualizationof the specific mauve pigmentation ofS. <strong>aureus</strong> allows working through culturesmore quickly; therefore, slide coagulase testscan be substantially reduced or eliminated.Additional biochemical tests or identificationmethods that may be needed on occasion forfinal identification can also be reduced oreliminated. Moreover, there is no need tosubculture organisms for antimicrobialsusceptibility testing. (13)The cost of selective media such asMSA is higher than that of nonselectivemedia. The additional costs incurred with theuse of the MSA <strong>and</strong> required subcultureplates, slide coagulase, <strong>and</strong> additionalbiochemical tests narrow the cost differential<strong>and</strong> make the change from a selectivemedium to CSA closer to cost-neutral. (12,13)So we recommend the use of CSAagar medium for the isolation <strong>and</strong> the specificidentification of S.<strong>aureus</strong> from pyodermalsuppurative skin lesions.REFERENCES1. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Hacek DM,Adrienne G. Fisher AG, ThomsonRB,Kaul KL, Peterson LR. Directdetection of <strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong> fromadult <strong>and</strong> neonate nasal swab specimensusing real-time polymerase chainreaction. JMD 2004; 6(3):191-203.2. Philppe P, Michele B, Ger<strong>and</strong> L,V<strong>and</strong>enesch F, Brun Y, Etienne J E.Comparative performances of sixagglutination kits assessed by usingtypical <strong>and</strong> atypical strains of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong>. J Clin Microbiol1997; 35:1138-40.3. Griethuysen V, Bes M, Etienne J,Zbinden R, Kluytmans J. Internationalmulticenter evaluation of latexagglutination tests for identification of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong>. J Clin Microbiol2001; 39:86-9.4. Perry JD, Rennison C, Butterworth LA,Hopley ALJ, F. Gould K. Evaluation ofS. <strong>aureus</strong> ID, a New Chromogenic <strong>Agar</strong>Medium for Detection of <strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus<strong>aureus</strong>. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:5695-8.5. Merlino J, Leroi M, Bradbury R, VealD, Harbour C. New chromogenicidentification <strong>and</strong> detection of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong> <strong>and</strong> methicillinresistantS. <strong>aureus</strong>. J Clin Microbiol2000; 38:2378-80.6. Baumert N, Eiff CV, Schaaff F, PetersSG, Proctor RA, Sahl HG. Physiology<strong>and</strong> antibiotic susceptibility of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong> small colonyvariants. Microb Drug Resist 2002;8:253-60.7. Baird R M, Lee WH. Media used in thedetection <strong>and</strong> enumeration of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong>. Int J FoodMicrobiol 1995; 26:15-24.8. Gaillot O, Wetsch M, Fortineau N,Berche P. Evaluation of CHROMagar<strong>Staph</strong>. <strong>aureus</strong>, a new chromogenicmedium, for isolation <strong>and</strong> presumptiveidentification of <strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong>from human clinical specimens. J ClinMicrobiol 2000; 38:1587-91.9. Göran H , Fang H. Evaluation of TwoNew Chromogenic Media, CHROMagarMRSA <strong>and</strong> S. <strong>aureus</strong> ID, for Identifying<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong> <strong>and</strong> ScreeningMethicillin-Resistant S. <strong>aureus</strong>. J ClinMicrobiol 2005; 34:4242-4.10. Kloose WE, Bannerman TL.<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>and</strong> Micrococcus. In:Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA,Tenover FC, Yoken RH (editors).Manual of clinical MICROBIOLOGY.6 th ed. Washington DC: Americansociety for Microbiology; 1995.p.282-98.11. Carricajo A, Treny A, Fonsale N, BesM, Reverdy M, Gille Y,et al,. Aubert,<strong>and</strong> A. M. Freydiere. Performance of thechromogenic medium CHROMagar<strong>Staph</strong> <strong>aureus</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Staph</strong>ychromcoagulase test in the detection <strong>and</strong>identification of <strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong>in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol2001; 39:2581-3.12. D’Souza HA,Baron EJ. BBLCHROMaga <strong>Staph</strong> <strong>aureus</strong> is superior tomannitol salt for detection of<strong>Staph</strong>ylococcus <strong>aureus</strong> in complex66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!