Andrew Argent Criteria for admission and refusal to PICU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20022003(16 m)2006 2007 2011Exposed 136 96 79 63 42Infected 118 68 43 34 60ICU survival(% infected)73 75 74 70Hospital survival(% infected)Alive and at Followup or transferred(%)Lost to follow up(%)46 51 51 ± 6514 19 5532 5where to now?Sean Barnabus
currently poor outcome• in our hands these patients do really badly– kwashiorkior with severe sepsis– AVSD with pulmonary stenosis• do we have the data?– or how will we collect it?• these patients are not always that clearly defined• are we simply maintaining the status quo – with nochance of improvement
Page 1: Criteria for admission andrefusal f
Page 7 and 8: Land MassChildrenworldmapper.com
Page 9: ChildrenPublic HealthExpenditurewor
Page 12 and 13: PICU at the RCWMCH - staffing• me
Page 14 and 15: the good we aim to achieve• monit
Page 16 and 17: can we do harm?• is it possible t
Page 18 and 19: the response …• development of
Page 20 and 21: who should be admitted?anyone who c
Page 22 and 23: when should life-sustaining therapy
Page 26 and 27: the child who is too well• where
Page 28 and 29: issues on implementation• dissemi
Page 30 and 31: easons for refusalsn %no beds 95 65
Page 32 and 33: admittedrefused
Page 34 and 35: PICU data on treatment of septic sh
Page 36 and 37: A 4 RDaniels and Sabin, Health Affa
Page 38 and 39: and the staff …

Andrew Argent Criteria for admission and refusal to PICU

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?