E-<strong>governance</strong> <strong>and</strong> Citizen Information 50 Research Questions <strong>and</strong> the Analytical Mo<strong>de</strong>lThe analysis of associations clearly emphasises the contingency of links <strong>and</strong> not its necessarycharacter. Based on our first study <strong>and</strong> other studies discussed in the theoretical framework,we have observed how adoption of a technical system can have clearly differentconsequences <strong>and</strong>, in some cases, <strong>de</strong>pending on a series of factors that range from the typeof organisational structure, the method of management or planning of change to the relationshipbetween IT personnel <strong>and</strong> the rest of workers. Therefore, it is important we <strong>de</strong>tect<strong>and</strong> observe these conditioning elements <strong>and</strong> not establish the simple causal relationshipsbetween technology <strong>and</strong> <strong>de</strong>termined organisational effects.Secondly, we should focus on the way in which the technical systems are adapted, modified<strong>and</strong> translated by organisations. This does not involve consi<strong>de</strong>ring technology as an unfinished<strong>and</strong> opaque element, but rather obtaining a clear picture of its use contexts. Firstly,because it is in the use (or uses) where technologies – or technical systems <strong>and</strong> mechanisms– usually acquire a stable meaning. And also because – especially in the world ofICTs – the periods for the <strong>de</strong>sign, implementation <strong>and</strong> use, far from being correlative, tendto be overlapping.Thirdly, our point of view also wishes to avoid the consi<strong>de</strong>ration of technological systems asexternal elements of the organisation. Within this context of the Public Administration, any <strong>information</strong>system – from the origins of the state in ancient Oriental empires – has been basedin a technical system (from systems based on paper <strong>and</strong> manual calculations, to tabulationsystems <strong>and</strong> statistical calculations that are automated by mechanical procedures). Informationsystems are not a secondary complement to the administration, but are part of its mostessential nucleus – there would be no administration without them.With these elements, we can formulate the basic hypothesis as follows:“The intensive incorporation of ICTs makes – as in other social environments – the path towardsother network organisational forms possible; this organisational form in the context ofthe Public Administration is what we call the Network Administration”.The main purpose of our research project can be un<strong>de</strong>rstood as a way of contrasting empiricallythese hypotheses, with an in-<strong>de</strong>pth analysis of the specific Administration <strong>and</strong>, withfewer <strong>de</strong>tails, three additional international administrations. Therefore, we are trying to establishthe extent at which this organisational form is replacing or tensioning the old ways oforganisation.In addition to establishing the scope of our questions in three specific areas of the Public Administration,we can do the same with our basic hypothesis: “In the scope of the relationshiphttp://www.uoc.edu/in3/pic
E-<strong>governance</strong> <strong>and</strong> Citizen Information 51 Research Questions <strong>and</strong> the Analytical Mo<strong>de</strong>lbetween <strong>citizen</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the Administration, the most important characteristics of the Network Administrationare the increase in the interaction with users (both qualitatively – an increase inthe methods to interact with the administration – <strong>and</strong> quantitatively – an increase in the <strong>de</strong>m<strong>and</strong>for <strong>information</strong>, queries, etc.), the increase in <strong>information</strong> available, improved flexibilityin access to <strong>information</strong> <strong>and</strong> public services, as well as the transparency of administrative action”.Within the scope of the internal organisation <strong>and</strong> running of the public sector, the NetworkAdministration shows a big improvement in transversality: more inter<strong>de</strong>partmental cooperation,more coordination to carry out projects jointly, more transfers of <strong>information</strong> <strong>and</strong> moreshared <strong>information</strong>. All of this lead to a Public Administration that is more flexible, capableof producing better <strong>and</strong> quicker responses to social contingencies <strong>and</strong>, in general, moreeffective <strong>and</strong> efficient.Within the scope of the relationships with other agents, the Network Administration translatesinto an increase in the relationships between the private sector <strong>and</strong> other public administrationson the same or different level. Therefore, public services are increasinglystructured as networks of private <strong>and</strong> public actors, where the <strong>de</strong>legation of execution is promoted<strong>and</strong> centralised control is increased. In this sense, the services are jointly managed<strong>and</strong> the different private agents participate in specific projects with limited <strong>de</strong>adlines.http://www.uoc.edu/in3/pic