12.07.2015 Views

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 N. H. Bingham <strong>and</strong> A. J. Ostaszewskiversions: a normed <strong>topological</strong> group version, immediately following, <strong>and</strong> a normed groupversion given in Theorem 6.13; the proofs are rather different.Theorem 6.11 (Subgroup <strong>Dichotomy</strong> Theorem – normed <strong>topological</strong> <strong>groups</strong>, Banach-KuratowskiTheorem – [Ban-G, Satz 1], [Kur-1, Ch. VI. 13. XII]; cf. [Kel, Ch. 6 Pblm P] ; cf.[BGT, Cor. 1.1.4] <strong>and</strong> also [BCS] <strong>and</strong> [Be] for the measure variant). Let X be a normed<strong>topological</strong> group which is non-meagre <strong>and</strong> A any Baire subgroup. Then A is either meagreor clopen in X.Proof. Suppose that A is non-meagre. We show that e is an interior point of A, fromwhich it follows that A is open. Suppose otherwise. Then there is a sequence z n → e withz n ∈ B 1/n (e)\A. Now for some a ∈ A <strong>and</strong> infinite M we have z n a ∈ A for all n ∈ M. ButA is a subgroup, hence z n = z n aa −1 ∈ A for n ∈ M, a contradiction.Now suppose that A is not closed. Let a n be a sequence in A with limit x. Then a n x −1 →e. Now for some a ∈ A <strong>and</strong> infinite M we have z n x −1 a ∈ A for all n ∈ M. But Ais a subgroup, so zn −1 <strong>and</strong> a −1 are in A <strong>and</strong> hence, for all n ∈ M, we have x −1 =z −1nz n x −1 aa −1 ∈ A. Hence x ∈ A, as A is a subgroup.Remark. Banach’s proof is purely <strong>topological</strong>, so applies to <strong>topological</strong> <strong>groups</strong> (eventhough originally stated for metric <strong>groups</strong>), <strong>and</strong> relies on the mapping x → ax beinga homeomorphism, likewise Kuratowski’s proof, which proceeds via another dichotomyas detailed below. We refer to McShane’s proof, cited below, as it yields a slightly moregeneral version.Theorem 6.12 (Kuratowski-McShane <strong>Dichotomy</strong> – [Kur-B], [Kur-1], [McSh, Cor. 1] ).Suppose H ⊆ Auth(X) acts transitively on the <strong>topological</strong> space X, <strong>and</strong> Z ⊆ X is Baire<strong>and</strong> has the property that for each h ∈ HZ = h(Z) or Z ∩ h(Z) = ∅,i.e. under each h ∈ H, either Z is invariant or Z <strong>and</strong> its image are disjoint. Then, eitherZ is meagre or it is clopen.Theorem 6.13 (Subgroup <strong>Dichotomy</strong> Theorem – normed <strong>groups</strong>). In a normed groupX, Baire under its norm topology, a Baire non-meagre subgroup is clopen.Proof. We work under the right norm topology <strong>and</strong> denote the subgroup in question S .Let H := {ρ x : x ∈ X} ⊆ Auth(X). Then as S is a subgroup, for x ∈ S, ρ x (S) = S, <strong>and</strong>,for x /∈ S, ρ x (S) ∩ S = ∅. Hence, by the Kuratowski-McShane <strong>Dichotomy</strong> (Th. 6.12), asS is non-meagre, it is clopen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!