12.07.2015 Views

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 N. H. Bingham <strong>and</strong> A. J. OstaszewskiDefinition. For X a Baire space (e.g. R + with the Euclidean or density topology)denote by Ba(X), or just Ba, the Baire sets of the space X, <strong>and</strong> recall these form aσ-algebra. Say that a correspondence F : Ba → Ba is monotonic if F (S) ⊆ F (T ) forS ⊆ T.The nub is the following simple result, which we call the Generic <strong>Dichotomy</strong> Principle.Theorem 5.3 (Generic <strong>Dichotomy</strong> Principle). For X Baire <strong>and</strong> F : Ba → Ba monotonic:either(i) there is a non-meagre S ∈ Ba with S ∩ F (S) = ∅, or,(ii) for every non-meagre T ∈ Ba, T ∩ F (T ) is quasi almost all of T.Equivalently: the existence condition that S ∩ F (S) ≠ ∅ should hold for all non-meagreS ∈ Ba, implies the genericity condition that, for each non-meagre T ∈ Ba, T ∩ F (T ) isquasi almost all of T.Proof. Suppose that (i) fails. Then S ∩F (S) ≠ ∅ for every non-meagre S ∈ Ba. We showthat (ii) holds. Suppose otherwise; thus for some T non-meagre in Ba, the set T ∩ F (T )is not almost all of T. Then the set U := T \F (T ) ⊆ T is non-meagre (it is in Ba as T<strong>and</strong> F (T ) are) <strong>and</strong> so∅ ̸= U ∩ F (U) (S ∩ F (S) ≠ ∅ for every non-meagre S)⊆ U ∩ F (T )(U ⊆ T <strong>and</strong> F monotonic).But as U := T \F (T ), U ∩ F (T ) = ∅, a contradiction.The final assertion simply rephrases the dichotomy as an implication.The following corollary permits the onus of verifying the existence condition of Theorem5.3 to be transferred to <strong>topological</strong> completeness.Theorem 5.4 (Generic Completeness Principle). For X Baire <strong>and</strong> F : Ba → Ba monotonic,if W ∩ F (W ) ≠ ∅ for all non-meagre W ∈ G δ , then, for each non-meagre T ∈ Ba,T ∩ F (T ) is quasi almost all of T.That is, either(i) there is a non-meagre S ∈ G δ with S ∩ F (S) = ∅, or,(ii) for every non-meagre T ∈ Ba, T ∩ F (T ) is quasi almost all of T.Proof. From Theorem 5.2, for S non-meagre in Ba there is a non-meagre W ⊆ S withW ∈ G δ . So W ∩ F (W ) ≠ ∅ <strong>and</strong> thus ∅ ̸= W ∩ F (W ) ⊆ S ∩ F (S), by monotonicity. ByTheorem 5.3 for every non-meagre T ∈ Ba, T ∩ F (T ) is quasi almost all of T.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!