70 N. H. Bingham <strong>and</strong> A. J. OstaszewskiNowSoHence we obtainSo in the limitas asserted.p(x) = p(ws) ≤ p(w) + p(r) = ∑ p(z i ) + p(s)≤ ∑ bδ(1 + ε i ) + p(s)= nbδ(1 + ε) + K.p(x)‖x‖ ≤ nδ‖x‖ b(1 + ε) + M ‖x‖ .p(x)‖x‖ ≤ b(1 + ε)2 + M ‖x‖ .lim sup ‖x‖→∞p(x)‖x‖ < β,We note a related result, which requires the following definition. For p subadditive,put (for this section only)p ∗ (x) = lim inf y→x p(y),p ∗ (x) := lim sup y→x p(y).These are subadditive <strong>and</strong> lower (resp. upper) semicontinuous with p ∗ (x) ≤ p(x) ≤ p ∗ (x).Theorem 4.6 (Mueller’s Theorem – [Mue, Th. 3]). Let p be subadditive on a locallycompact group G <strong>and</strong> supposeThen p is continuous almost everywhere.lim inf x→e p ∗ (x) ≤ 0.We now return to the proof of Theorem 3.20, delayed from Section 3.2.Proof of Theorem 3.20. Apply Theorem 4.5 to the subadditive function p(x) :=‖f(x)‖, which is continuous <strong>and</strong> so Baire. Thus there is X such that, for ‖x‖ ≥ X,‖f(x)‖ ≤ β‖x‖.Taking ε = 1 in the definition of a word-net, there is δ > 0 small enough so that B δ (e) ispre-compact <strong>and</strong> there exists a compact set of generators Z δ such that for each x there isa word of length n(x) employing generators of Z δ with n(x) ≤ 2‖x‖/δ. Hence if ‖x‖ ≤ Xwe have n(x) ≤ 2M/δ. Let N := [2M/δ], the least integer greater than 2M/δ. Note thatZδN := Z δ ·...·Z δ (N times) is compact. The set B K (e) is covered by the compact swellingK :=cl[Zδ N B δ(e)]. Hence, we havesup x∈K‖f(x)‖‖x‖< ∞,(referring to β g < ∞, <strong>and</strong> continuity of ‖x‖ g /‖x‖ away from e), <strong>and</strong> soM ≤ max{β, sup x∈K ‖f(x)‖/‖x‖} < ∞.
<strong>Normed</strong> <strong>groups</strong> 715. Generic <strong>Dichotomy</strong>In this section we develop the first of several (in fact six) bi-<strong>topological</strong> approaches toa generalization of the Kestelman-Borwein-Ditor Theorem (KBD) in the introduction(Th.1.1) We will see later just how useful the result can be in several areas: we regardit as a measure-category analogue of the celebrated probabilistic method of Erdős (forwhich see e.g. [AS], [TV], [GRS]), here exp<strong>and</strong>ed to a theorem on the generic alternative– a generic dichotomy (as defined below). The aproach of this section, inspired by a closereading of [BHW], ultimately rests on one-sided completeness in the underlying normedstructure, namely that the right (or, left) norm topology be completely metrizable onsome non-meagre subspace. (The two choices are equivalent, since (X, d R ) <strong>and</strong> (X, d L )are isometric – see Prop. 2.15.) This embraces <strong>groups</strong> of homeomorphisms that may notbe <strong>topological</strong> <strong>groups</strong>.For background on <strong>topological</strong> group completeness, refer to [Br-1] for a discussion ofthe three uniformities of a <strong>topological</strong> group. (There the one-sided completeness is impliedby the ambidextrous uniformity being complete, cf. [Kel, Ch. 6 Problem Q].) Comparealso Th. 3.9 on ambidextrous refinement. Actually we apparently need only local versionsof <strong>topological</strong> completeness, so we recall Brown’s Theorem that if a <strong>topological</strong> group islocally complete then it is paracompact <strong>and</strong> <strong>topological</strong>ly complete. (In fact the structureis even more tightly prescribed, see [Br-2].)Alternative approaches are given in subsequent sections with modified assumptions.To formulate a first generalization of KBD we will need a pair of definitions. Tomotivate them recall (see e.g. [Eng, 4.3.23 <strong>and</strong> 24]) that a metric space A is completelymetrizable iff it is a G δ subset of its completion (i.e. A = ⋂ n∈ω G n with each G n open inthe completion of A), in which case it has an equivalent metric under which it is complete.Thus when (X, d R ) is complete, a G δ subset A of X has a metric ρ = ρ A , equivalent tod R , under which (A, ρ) is complete. (So for each a ∈ A <strong>and</strong> ε > 0 there is δ > 0 such thatB δ (a) ⊆ Bε ρ (a), where B δ (a) refers to d R , <strong>and</strong> this enables the construction of ρ-Cauchysequences.)With this in mind we may return to Brown’s theorem on completeness implied by localcompletness, to note that in the metrizable context the result follows from a localizationprinciple of Montgomery in [Mont0] asserting in particular that a subspace that is locallya G δ at all its points is itself a G δ . (One need only embed a metric space in its owncompletion.)Definition. Say that a normed group (X, ‖ · ‖) is <strong>topological</strong>ly complete if (X, d R ) iscompletely metrizable as a metric space; equivalently, one may require that (X, d L ) be<strong>topological</strong>ly complete, as the latter is homeomorphic to (X, d R ) <strong>and</strong> <strong>topological</strong> completenessis indeed <strong>topological</strong> (see [Eng] Th. 4.3.26 taken together with Th. 3.9.1 –there the term Čech-complete is used). In particular, a locally compact normed group is<strong>topological</strong>ly complete.
- Page 1 and 2:
N. H. BINGHAM and A. J. OSTASZEWSKI
- Page 3 and 4:
Normed groups 3ContentsContents . .
- Page 5 and 6:
1. IntroductionGroup-norms, which b
- Page 7 and 8:
Normed groups 3Topological complete
- Page 9 and 10:
Normed groups 5abelian group has se
- Page 11 and 12:
Normed groups 74 (Topological permu
- Page 13 and 14:
Normed groups 9The following result
- Page 15 and 16:
Normed groups 11Corollary 2.4. For
- Page 17 and 18:
Normed groups 13More generally, for
- Page 19 and 20:
Normed groups 15definitions, our pr
- Page 21 and 22:
Normed groups 17so that fg is in th
- Page 23 and 24: Normed groups 19(iii) The ¯d H -to
- Page 25 and 26: Normed groups 21so‖αβ‖ ≤
- Page 27 and 28: Normed groups 23Remark. Note that,
- Page 29 and 30: Normed groups 25shows that [z n , y
- Page 31 and 32: Normed groups 27Denoting this commo
- Page 33 and 34: Normed groups 29Theorem 3.4 (Equiva
- Page 35 and 36: Normed groups 31argument as again p
- Page 37 and 38: Normed groups 33(ii) For α ∈ H u
- Page 39 and 40: Normed groups 35Definition. A group
- Page 41 and 42: Normed groups 37We now give an expl
- Page 43 and 44: Normed groups 39Theorem 3.19 (Abeli
- Page 45 and 46: Normed groups 412. Further recall t
- Page 47 and 48: Normed groups 43Theorem 3.22 (Lipsc
- Page 49 and 50: Normed groups 45Proof. Z γ = G (cf
- Page 51 and 52: Normed groups 47Theorem 3.30. Let G
- Page 53 and 54: Normed groups 49Remark. On the matt
- Page 55 and 56: Normed groups 51As for the conclusi
- Page 57 and 58: Normed groups 53By (C-adm), we may
- Page 59 and 60: Normed groups 55equipped with an in
- Page 61 and 62: Normed groups 57Proof. To apply Th.
- Page 63 and 64: Normed groups 59Definition. A point
- Page 65 and 66: Normed groups 61Proposition 3.46 (M
- Page 67 and 68: Normed groups 63Thus ω δ (s) ≤
- Page 69 and 70: Normed groups 65Remark. In the penu
- Page 71 and 72: Normed groups 67The result confirms
- Page 73: Normed groups 69Proof. By the Baire
- Page 77 and 78: Normed groups 73Returning to the cr
- Page 79 and 80: Normed groups 75Examples. Here are
- Page 81 and 82: Normed groups 77cf. [Eng, 4.3.23].)
- Page 83 and 84: Normed groups 79Remarks. 1. See [Fo
- Page 85 and 86: Normed groups 81Theorem 6.1 (Catego
- Page 87 and 88: Normed groups 83is continuous at th
- Page 89 and 90: Normed groups 85compact. Evidently,
- Page 91 and 92: Normed groups 87j ∈ ω} which enu
- Page 93 and 94: Normed groups 89The result below ge
- Page 95 and 96: Normed groups 91left-shift, not in
- Page 97 and 98: Normed groups 93As a corollary of t
- Page 99 and 100: Normed groups 953. For X a normed g
- Page 101 and 102: Normed groups 97Proof. Note that‖
- Page 103 and 104: Normed groups 99Taking h(x) := ‖
- Page 105 and 106: Normed groups 1019. The Semigroup T
- Page 107 and 108: Normed groups 103Theorem 9.5 (Semig
- Page 109 and 110: Normed groups 105By the Category Em
- Page 111 and 112: Normed groups 107Proof. Say f is bo
- Page 113 and 114: Normed groups 109Thus G is locally
- Page 115 and 116: Normed groups 111Theorem 10.10 (Bar
- Page 117 and 118: Normed groups 113K-analyticity was
- Page 119 and 120: Normed groups 115Theorem 11.6 (Disc
- Page 121 and 122: Normed groups 117restricted to X\M
- Page 123 and 124: Normed groups 119groups need not be
- Page 125 and 126:
Normed groups 121Proof. In the meas
- Page 127 and 128:
Normed groups 123Hence, as t i n
- Page 129 and 130:
Normed groups 125The corresponding
- Page 131 and 132:
Normed groups 127(t, x) ✛✻Φ T
- Page 133 and 134:
Normed groups 129Fix s. Since s is
- Page 135 and 136:
Normed groups 131Hence,‖x‖ −
- Page 137 and 138:
Normed groups 133converging to the
- Page 139 and 140:
Normed groups 135Definition. Let {
- Page 141 and 142:
Normed groups 137However, whilst th
- Page 143 and 144:
Normed groups 139embeddable, 14enab
- Page 145 and 146:
Normed groups 141Bibliography[AL]J.
- Page 147 and 148:
Normed groups 143Series 378, 2010.[
- Page 149 and 150:
Normed groups 145abelian groups, Ma
- Page 151 and 152:
Normed groups 147[Kak] S. Kakutani,
- Page 153 and 154:
Normed groups 149fields. I. Basic p
- Page 155:
Normed groups 151[So]R. M. Solovay,