12.07.2015 Views

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

Normed versus topological groups: Dichotomy and duality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 N. H. Bingham <strong>and</strong> A. J. OstaszewskiProof. For the direct implication, suppose otherwise. Then for some Cauchy {x n } <strong>and</strong>some ε > 0 <strong>and</strong> each δ = 1/k (k = 1, 2, ...) there is n = n(k) > k <strong>and</strong> w k with ‖w k ‖ < 1/ksuch that‖x n(k) w k x −1n(k) ‖ > ε.But w k is null <strong>and</strong> x n(k) is Cauchy, so from (C-adm) it follows that x n(k) w k x −1n(k) → e, acontradiction.The converse is immediate.Definition. For an arbitrary sequence x n , puttingγ x(n) (w) := x n wx −1n ,we say that {γ x(n) } is uniformly continuous at e if the uniformity condition of Lemma3.33 holds. Thus that Lemma may be interpreted as asserting that {γ x(n) } is uniformlycontinuous at e for all Cauchy {x n } iff (C-adm) holds.Our next result strengthens Lemma 3.5 in showing that for inner automorphisms aweak form of continuity implies continuity.Lemma 3.34 (Weak Continuity Criterion). For any fixed sequence x n , if for all nullsequences w n we have γ x(n(k)) (w n(k) ) → e X down some subsequence w n(k) , then {γ x(n) }is uniformly continuous at e.In particular, for a fixed x <strong>and</strong> all null sequences w n , if γ x (w n(k) ) → e X down somesubsequence w n(k) , then γ x is continuous.Proof. We are to show that for every ε > 0 there is δ > 0 <strong>and</strong> N such that for all n > Nx n B(δ)x −1n⊂ B(ε).Suppose not. Then there is ε > 0 such that for each k = 1, 2, .. <strong>and</strong> each δ = 1/k thereis n = n(k) > k <strong>and</strong> w k with ‖w k ‖ < 1/k <strong>and</strong> ‖x n(k) w k x −1n(k) ‖ > ε. So w k → 0. Byassumption, down some subsequence k(h) we have ‖x n(k(h)) w k(h) x −1n(k(h))‖ → 0. But thiscontradicts ‖x n(k(h)) w k(h) x −1n(k(h)) ‖ > ε.The last assertion is immediate from taking x n ≡ x, as the uniform continuity conditionat e reduces to continuity at e.Theorem 3.35. In a normed group, the condition (C-adm) holds iff the product ofCauchy sequences is Cauchy.Proof. We work in the right norm topology <strong>and</strong> refer to d R -Cauchy sequences.First we assume (C-adm). Let x n <strong>and</strong> y n be Cauchy. For m, n large we are to show thatd R (x n y n , x m y m ) = ‖x n y n ym −1 x −1m ‖ is small. We note that‖x n wx −1m ‖ = ‖x n wx −1n x n x −1m ‖ ≤ ‖x n wx −1n ‖ + ‖x n x −1m ‖≤ ‖x n wx −1n ‖ + d R (x n , x m ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!