12.07.2015 Views

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Based on the policies and surveys, this chapteranalyses the <strong>parking</strong> problems in <strong>Beijing</strong>.4.1 Parking strategies andpoliciesWith fast growing car ownership, <strong>parking</strong> hasquickly become a major problem for <strong>Beijing</strong>.Some of the <strong>parking</strong> policies are good, but actualimplementation of these policies has not happenedor is poorly executed. There is no publictransport priority when buses are stuck in trafficjams caused by private car use. Some policiescontradict each other: guiding car traffic awayfrom central areas cannot be achieved when abundantoff-street <strong>parking</strong> is supplied in central areas.High <strong>parking</strong> prices, with differentiations perarea, are good on paper, but in reality drivers paymuch less as they negotiate prices with the <strong>parking</strong>guards. A <strong>parking</strong> cap in the city center wasnever implemented, nor was the use of moderntechnology for on-street <strong>parking</strong>. Attractingprivate investment in off-street <strong>parking</strong> supplyhas proven unrealistic when drivers can park forfree on streets because paid <strong>parking</strong> is lacking orillegal <strong>parking</strong> not enforced.Other policies such as P+R facilities are costlywith only limited effects. The Liufang P+R <strong>parking</strong>was heavily used by residents and employeesliving and working in the vicinity, but not byanyone who used the metro. P+R facilities requirevast amounts of land in expensive areas (given itsproximity to metro stations) that should ratherbe used for transit-oriented development (TOD).Furthermore, besides the investment costs forhaving these facilities built, the city governmentdaily spends 6.89 RMB per P+R space to subsidizeoperational costs of P+R spaces, totaling to 25million RMB in 2014.Instead of using <strong>parking</strong> as a tool to restrictcar use, especially in central areas, <strong>Beijing</strong> governmentshave rather sought to solve <strong>parking</strong>problems by increasing the supply of off-street<strong>parking</strong>. There are three major problems with thisapproach.1. The government is not responsible for theprovision of ample <strong>parking</strong>A <strong>parking</strong> space is a commodity, not a fundamentalright. The government is not responsible forproviding ample <strong>parking</strong> to residents. Instead, thegovernment is responsible for well-organized trafficand streets, if possible with on-street <strong>parking</strong>,and the provision of transport systems, includingpublic transport and walking and cycling infrastructure.It is also responsible for setting the rightpolicies for off-street <strong>parking</strong> supply in which realestate developers and private investors play animportant role. Finding a <strong>parking</strong> space is mainlythe driver’s own responsibility and the space isto be rented from the government (on-street) orbuilding operator (private off-street) at a pricethat reflects its value and enforces the government’stargets for traffic reduction.It is important to realizethat a <strong>parking</strong> space is acommodity, not a fundamentalright. An onstreet<strong>parking</strong> space ison government land andessentially belongs to allpeople. The governmentcan decide to allocatestreet space for on-street<strong>parking</strong>, but that needsto come at a price (rent)to its users. It is not thegovernment’s responsibilityto provide everyonewith a <strong>parking</strong> space.<strong>Beijing</strong> Parking, <strong>ITDP</strong>-<strong>China</strong> 911 March 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!