12.07.2015 Views

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

Beijing-parking-ITDP-China

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.1 Abolish <strong>parking</strong>minimums for newdevelopments<strong>Beijing</strong> currently uses <strong>parking</strong> minimums for newdevelopments. Parking minimums, especially forresidential land use, are not high, compared toother Chinese cities, but are likely to rise in theforthcoming updates to the <strong>parking</strong> standard.Minimums require developers to build more<strong>parking</strong> than would often be needed. This wasproven with the surveys at residential, commercialand office <strong>parking</strong> garages, as presented in chapter3. at By doing so, they build costly <strong>parking</strong> thatsits empty and encourages residents to drive.Minimum <strong>parking</strong> regulations impose majorsocietal costs and undermine efforts to createbalanced, sustainable transportation systems.Minimum <strong>parking</strong> regulations create a cycle thatencourages car transportation, and, in turn, influencespublic authorities to require more <strong>parking</strong>.This analysis is strengthened by a New Yorkstudy which found that accessory <strong>parking</strong> at homeis more likely to generate auto commutes thanother factors including household income, autoownership or a host of other things usually associatedwith the decision to drive (<strong>ITDP</strong>, 2010).Minimum <strong>parking</strong> regulations reduce density,increase distances between destinations, reduceland values and increases traffic congestion, airpollution, and construction costs, as well as discouragingwalking, bicycling and public transport.Minimum <strong>parking</strong> requirements are especiallydamaging to central business districts (CBDs).Many developers worldwide acknowledge thisand negotiate with the government to build less<strong>parking</strong> than required to prevent having to passthe cost of expensive <strong>parking</strong> on to buyers andtenants.Construction of underground <strong>parking</strong> spacesin <strong>China</strong> costs approximately 3,000 RMB/m2(Cutian City Newspaper, 2014). With an underground<strong>parking</strong> spaces requiring 30-40m2, thetotal costs per space are 90,000-120,000 RMB per<strong>parking</strong> space and operational costs are approximately240RMB per month (Guangzhou PriceBureau Cost Survey Team, 2013).7.2 Implement <strong>parking</strong>maximumsIt is recommended for <strong>Beijing</strong> to change <strong>parking</strong>minimums into <strong>parking</strong> maximums. Minimum<strong>parking</strong> standards ‘lock in’ driving into the urbanfabric whereas <strong>parking</strong> maximums are a powerfultool to control the number of <strong>parking</strong> spacesand put a hold on dramatic vehicle growth. Itlets developers decide the appropriate number of<strong>parking</strong> spaces reasonably needed, within maximumsdefined by the government, and reducesland and costs associated with excessive <strong>parking</strong>supply. These maximums are based on roadcapacity, public transport access and livabilityfactors like air quality. Developers are in favor ofthese regulations, as it lowers unnecessary coststo their development, thereby increasing theirlikeliness of selling apartments and increasingtheir profitability.Cities that have successfully solved <strong>parking</strong>problems and have successful urban developmenthave taken a restrictive approach to <strong>parking</strong>supply and implemented <strong>parking</strong> maximums.Buildings do not necessarily need <strong>parking</strong>, butrather good access. This access can be providedwith high-quality public transport and NMTfacilities, which have much less or no negativeimpact on traffic and air quality. For instance, thehighest-value office and commercial building inLondon has no <strong>parking</strong> places at all, only somefor handicapped, motorbikes and bicycles. Threemetro stations are located within 500 meter fromthe building and three more within 1 kilometer.This shows <strong>parking</strong> often does not add value butextra costs to a building. London implemented a<strong>parking</strong> maximums for offices at 1 <strong>parking</strong> spaceper 1,000-1,500m2 of office space. Many cities,including Japanese, also exempt small buildings(under 1,500m2) from mandatory <strong>parking</strong>construction. Other European capitals like Paris(France) and Budapest (Hungary) have lower(down to zero) maximums for developers, whenthe development is close to public transport. Inreturn the developers need to co-finance publictransportation to the development (which alsobenefits the developer since it raises its value).In <strong>China</strong>, Shenzhen is the first to implementmaximum standards for <strong>parking</strong> supply in newdevelopments. The Shenzhen Urban PlanningStandards and Guidelines (2014), defined by the<strong>Beijing</strong> Parking, <strong>ITDP</strong>-<strong>China</strong> 1461 March 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!