12.07.2015 Views

11. Interfacial Mechanism and Kinetics of Phase-Transfer Catalysis

11. Interfacial Mechanism and Kinetics of Phase-Transfer Catalysis

11. Interfacial Mechanism and Kinetics of Phase-Transfer Catalysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

According to Eqs. (57)–(61), <strong>and</strong> for organic volume V <strong>and</strong> interfacial area S, the rate <strong>of</strong>change <strong>of</strong> solute concentration can be expressed byV d½QXŠ¼ KS dt o m½QXŠ m½QXŠ ð62Þin whichK o ¼ m þ 1 þ m 1ð63Þk a k m k oAccording to the initial extractive concept that the content <strong>of</strong> quaternary salt is restrictedto less than 10% in the aqueous solution, the quaternary salt is completely dissociated, i.e.,[QX] approaches zero, <strong>and</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the distribution coefficient m is less than 10.By plotting ðV=SÞd½QXŠ=dt against ½QX], the overall mass transfer coefficient K o wasobtained by a least-squares regression. The regression factor is more than 0.99.If the extraction system is conducted in the absence <strong>of</strong> membrane, Eq. (63) is rewrittenasK o ¼m þ 1 1ð64Þk a k oThe values <strong>of</strong> diffusivities predicted for quaternary salts in the aqueous phase <strong>and</strong>the organic phase are in the following descending order: TBPB > TBAB > TBAI BTBAB <strong>and</strong> RBAB > TBAI > TBPB > BTBAB; respectively. The diffusivities <strong>of</strong> quaternarysalts increased with increasing temperature. The effects <strong>of</strong> solvents on diffusivitiesare ranked in the following descending order: CH 2 Cl 2 > C 6 H 5 CH 3 > CHCl 3 > C 6 H 6 >C 6 H 5 Cl > 1; 2-C 2 H 4 Cl 2 > H 2 O. The main influencing factor may be the viscosity <strong>of</strong> solvent.The overall mass transfer coefficients were determined by Lin [127]. The values <strong>of</strong> k o ,k a ,<strong>and</strong>k m were calculated by a numerical method for four types <strong>of</strong> quaternary salts inseven kinds <strong>of</strong> solvents. Assuming that the hydrodynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the diffusionboundary layer in the aqueous phase <strong>and</strong> the organic phase were similar in the presence orabsence <strong>of</strong> the membrane system if the agitation rate was kept below 100 rpm, the individualmass transfer coefficient <strong>of</strong> the membrane could then be calculated by subtractingEq. (64) from Eq. (63). The individual mass transfer coefficients increased with increasingagitation rates <strong>and</strong> temperatures. The sequence <strong>of</strong> mass transfer coefficient isk a k o > k m .Kiani et al. [125] <strong>and</strong> Prasad et al. [126] reported the following equation for theintrinsic mass transfer coefficient in the membrane, k m ¼ D"= m , where " <strong>and</strong> m are theporosity <strong>and</strong> thickness <strong>of</strong> the membrane, respectively, is the tortuosity factor <strong>of</strong> themembrane defined as the actual pore length divided by the membrane thickness, <strong>and</strong> Dis the diffusivity <strong>of</strong> species in the bulk liquid phase. The average tortuosities were calculated<strong>and</strong> found to reduce from 4.3 to 2.7 when the agitation rates increased from 90 to 600rpm. Because the individual mass transfer coefficient <strong>of</strong> a membrane is not a constant <strong>and</strong>increases with increasing agitation rate, the tortuosity decreases slightly with increasingagitation rate according to the equation <strong>of</strong> Kinai et al. [125].If the mixing is so vigorous that the diffusion boundary layer can be eliminated, Eq.(62) can be reduced toVSd½QXŠdt k m m½QXŠ m½QXŠka ;k o !1¼ ð65ÞCopyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!