01.12.2012 Views

Republic of the Philippines - Campaign

Republic of the Philippines - Campaign

Republic of the Philippines - Campaign

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPELLANTS’ BRIEF<br />

People <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong> vs. Fortuna, et. al.<br />

S. C. G. R. No. 141660-64<br />

TOTAL TIME ELAPSED from <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

arrival at City Hall to start <strong>of</strong> taking Joel<br />

de Jesus’ statement.<br />

1 hour to 1<br />

hour and 10<br />

minutes<br />

35 to 42<br />

minutes<br />

The document evidencing <strong>the</strong> alleged extra-judicial confession <strong>of</strong> Joel de Jesus<br />

states that <strong>the</strong> statement was taken from 1:10 p.m. Taking <strong>the</strong> time frame according to <strong>the</strong><br />

two witnesses, it would have been impossible to start <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> Joel’s statement at<br />

1:10 p.m.<br />

If we use Castillo’s testimony, <strong>the</strong> probable start <strong>of</strong> taking Joel’s statement would<br />

have been 2:00 or 2:10 p.m. while if we use Garcia’s testimony, it should have started at<br />

1:35 or 1:42 p.m. This is nowhere near <strong>the</strong> 1:10 p.m. written on <strong>the</strong> heading <strong>of</strong> Joel de<br />

Jesus’ statement in question.<br />

We have also pointed out earlier that <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statement was allegedly<br />

finished at 5:55 p.m. as appearing in <strong>the</strong> document itself and as confirmed by <strong>the</strong> police<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers. Yet, Joel de Jesus signed <strong>the</strong> document at exactly 5:00 p.m. How can this<br />

happen that a document was signed 55 minutes prior to its completion?<br />

Such inconsistencies indicate falsity in <strong>the</strong> assertions being forwarded by <strong>the</strong><br />

prosecution that <strong>the</strong> purported taking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extra-judicial confessions <strong>of</strong> Joel de Jesus<br />

and Lorenzo delos Santos allegedly at <strong>the</strong> IBP Office in Quezon City Hall ever really<br />

happened.<br />

3. Certain facts presented by <strong>the</strong> prosecution itself establish that Joel de<br />

Jesus was interrogated by <strong>the</strong> police investigators right after his arrest,<br />

without <strong>the</strong> assistance <strong>of</strong> counsel, and indicate that <strong>the</strong> alleged<br />

interrogation <strong>of</strong> Joel de Jesus at <strong>the</strong> IBP Office did not actually take<br />

place.<br />

Moreover, certain facts advanced by <strong>the</strong> prosecution itself support <strong>the</strong> testimonies<br />

<strong>of</strong> Joel de Jesus and Lorenzo delos Santos that <strong>the</strong>ir Constitutional rights to remain silent<br />

and to have competent and independent counsels were violated.<br />

Police Sr. Inspector Jose B. Macanas, witness for <strong>the</strong> prosecution, testified as to<br />

<strong>the</strong> particulars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrest <strong>of</strong> Joel de Jesus, Cesar Fortuna and Lorenzo delos Santos.<br />

Page 83 <strong>of</strong> 127<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!