Republic of the Philippines - Campaign
Republic of the Philippines - Campaign
Republic of the Philippines - Campaign
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPELLANTS’ BRIEF<br />
People <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong> vs. Fortuna, et. al.<br />
S. C. G. R. No. 141660-64<br />
dated 25 November 1999, and several o<strong>the</strong>r related manifestations and motions mainly to<br />
present additional evidence on <strong>the</strong> ABB angle. They also include accused Joel de Jesus'<br />
Motion for New Trial dated August 31, 1999 to present to new alibi witnesses.<br />
Annex C- Order dated January 26, 2000<br />
This is <strong>the</strong> initial short Order given in open hearing denying Fr. Roberto Reyes'<br />
Urgent Independent Motion to Present Vital Evidence dated January 19, 2000 in support<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABB angle.<br />
Annex D - Order dated January 28, 2000<br />
This is <strong>the</strong> long Order elaborating on <strong>the</strong> immediately preceding Order, Annex C.<br />
The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> controversy has to do not only with <strong>the</strong> guilt or innocence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
accused-appellants based on <strong>the</strong> available evidence but also whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir constitutional<br />
and human rights were respected, from arrest up to conviction and even up to <strong>the</strong><br />
reconsideration stage, when <strong>the</strong>y sought a last chance to present additional evidence to<br />
prove <strong>the</strong>ir innocence. In addition, <strong>the</strong> death penalty itself imposed on <strong>the</strong> accused-<br />
appellants is under controversy here.<br />
Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 127<br />
10