Catchment Management Plan - Hunter Water

Catchment Management Plan - Hunter Water Catchment Management Plan - Hunter Water

hunterwater.com.au
from hunterwater.com.au More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

3.5 Element 5: Fosteringresearch programs inour catchmentsPurposeTo better pursue collaborativefunding opportunities fortargeted local catchment research.PrécisBetter information leads to betterdecisions. Hunter Water will foster thestrong ties with universities and otherresearch bodies to understand how thecatchments function. Hunter Water’sR&D program will guide the research.3.5.1 Current catchmentresearch: GrahamstownAdaptive Management StudyGrahamstown Dam is an important watersource for the Hunter as it supplies 40%of our water supply on an ongoing basis.Monitoring of Grahamstown demonstratedthat there have been increasing numbersof blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) inGrahamstown over the past 15 years.The increasing number of blooms ofcyanobacteria can be seen in Figure 22.Cyanobacteria have the capacity tocause an objectionable change in tasteand odour of the raw water or produceother damaging toxins which may bedifficult to treat. An increasing number andbloom frequency of these algae is oftena sign that nutrients are increasing in awaterway. 11In 2008, Hunter Water has committed$580 000 to the Grahamstown AdaptiveManagement Study (GAMS) which aims to“provide information on how waterquality in Grahamstown Damis managed to maintain yield atsatisfactory levels whilst providing a low,or managed, likelihood of developmentof problematic algal blooms.”GAMS is broken down into the followingseparate studies of water quality:• A three-yearly benthic macrophyte(water plant) survey - it is knownthat water plants take up significantamounts of nutrients and thereforetheir role in the dam’s ecology isoperationally important.• Investigations into the contributionof sediments to Dam nutrients andongoing seasonal investigationsinto the cause of algal blooms– The University of TechnologySydney has been commissioned toinvestigate the interaction betweennutrients in the sediment and watercolumn and the amount of algae thatgrow as a result.• Investigations into the biologicalcontrol of algae – fish andplanktonic organisms that have arole in controlling algae will alsobe examined.This study is now partially completed.When complete, it will provide a betterinsight into the ecology of GrahamstownDam and will allow more informed strategicplanning and operational decisions.Grahamstown Reservoir GRAHAMSTOWN Cynobacterial RESERVOIR LevelsCYANOBACTERIAL LEVELSSouthern Monitoring Site off Schroder Pump StationCELLS PER MILLILITRE50,00045,00040,00035,00030,00025,00020,00015,00010,0005,0000Southern Monitoring Site off Schroder Pump StationTotal Cyanobacteria Anabaena Microcystis3.5.2 Research and Developmentat Hunter WaterAccording to Hunter Water’s Researchand Development (R&D) Strategy, waterquality and public health and systemmodelling are two key focus areas forfuture research. These focus areas includeactivities such as:• Looking at the impacts of recreationon drinking water bodies;• Better understanding how nutrients,pathogens and/or suspended solidsenter our source waters;• Obtaining improved data for thedecision support tool (i.e. the SWISS)which enables better identificationand prioritisation of catchment work.As there are many opportunities forleveraging grant funds in catchments,an important part of fostering researchis liaising with other catchmentstakeholders and identifying appropriategrant opportunities for a better researchoutcome.Figure 22: Cyanobacterial numbers in Grahamstown Dam 1992 -200711 Smith et al (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrialecosystems, Env. PollutionCATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN . ssS . 001 . JUNE201036

3.5.2 Hunter Water’s vision forcatchment researchResearch of identified knowledge gaps incatchments is promoted, particularly atthe University of Newcastle, focusing oninforming the Source Water ImprovementSupport System.Specific funding is allocated to identifiedareas of need; the outcomes begin toinform management decisions. Catchmentresearch is fostered at NewcastleUniversity.Collaborative and leveraged fundingopportunities are leveraged; drinking watercatchment research is a scientific focus atNewcastle University.HORIZON 1 HORIZON 2 HORIZON 3►This price path 2010 - 2013 Next price path 2013 - 2017 Our vision for the future 2017 - beyond►►“Part 4: The action plan 2010-2013” explains in more detail how Hunter Water will move towards this vision.3.6 Element 6: Performproactive surveillanceObjectiveTo perform regular,documented surveillance ofcatchments, ultimately improving thequality of catchment risk assessments.PrécisHunter Water presently has rangers whoare active in catchments and thereforeprovide ‘informal’ surveillance services.Surveillance will be formalised to meetthe requirements of the Framework forthe Management of Drinking WaterQuality. Regular, programmed andproactive surveillance will feed back intopolicy and risk assessment outcomes.3.6.1 Why surveillance, andhow much is enough?To understand a catchment area “regulardocumented inspections to monitorcatchment conditions and land usechanges” should be undertaken . The veryaction of being seen proactively patrollingthe catchment sends a positive signal tothe land owners that the utility does careabout land management and is interestedin their activities.In conversations with other water andcatchment management authorities andCATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN . ssS . 001 . JUNE2010from the literature, catchment knowledgeis often identified as one of the singlegreatest barriers to waterborne disease.Catchment knowledge is vital because theapplication of the risk assessment processis entirely reliant on the understanding ofthe water supply system from catchmentto tap. Inspection of catchments is the keyactivity that will increase an organisation’sknowledge and understanding of itscatchment area.The frequency of surveillance isdependant upon the risk in a catchment.As Hunter Water’s catchments can bedescribed as partly or fully developed,current best practise is a minimum of 3-5days per week of surveillance.In addition to traditional surveillance,aerial and satellite imagery can also beuseful to detect changes in land use.Satellite imagery especially can be usedto assess changes in land use suchas amount of vegetation clearing or toassess the effects of bushfire.3.6.2 Surveillance currentlyconducted in catchments andbest practiceHunter Water currently has three full timeRangers who are based in the field andthus are regularly engaged in surveillanceof the catchments. Between these staffthere would be in excess of 5 days spenton informal surveillance.Current best practice surveillance incatchments involves not only monitoringcatchments but also recordingobservations. Specific items to observeare shown in Appendix B. In brief,records should be kept of the following:• General land use activities and landuse changes,• Checking for unusual, unapproved orunlawful activities,• Inspections following incidents (fires,heavy rain, spills),• Proactive management of catchmentsto predict risks and hazards.It is important that this informationis recorded and used in strategicplanning decision making. For this tooccur, a template or simple checklistmust be generated so that surveillancecan be standardised acrosscatchments and time.3.6.3 Recent improvements tosurveillance techniquesAppendix C shows a templatedeveloped within the last year for theWilliamtown RAAF base. It sets out theinspection frequency, what to inspectand the considerations for each site.The aim of developing the template wasto standardise inspections and makethem routine.37

3.5.2 <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong>’s vision forcatchment researchResearch of identified knowledge gaps incatchments is promoted, particularly atthe University of Newcastle, focusing oninforming the Source <strong>Water</strong> ImprovementSupport System.Specific funding is allocated to identifiedareas of need; the outcomes begin toinform management decisions. <strong>Catchment</strong>research is fostered at NewcastleUniversity.Collaborative and leveraged fundingopportunities are leveraged; drinking watercatchment research is a scientific focus atNewcastle University.HORIZON 1 HORIZON 2 HORIZON 3►This price path 2010 - 2013 Next price path 2013 - 2017 Our vision for the future 2017 - beyond►►“Part 4: The action plan 2010-2013” explains in more detail how <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> will move towards this vision.3.6 Element 6: Performproactive surveillanceObjectiveTo perform regular,documented surveillance ofcatchments, ultimately improving thequality of catchment risk assessments.Précis<strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> presently has rangers whoare active in catchments and thereforeprovide ‘informal’ surveillance services.Surveillance will be formalised to meetthe requirements of the Framework forthe <strong>Management</strong> of Drinking <strong>Water</strong>Quality. Regular, programmed andproactive surveillance will feed back intopolicy and risk assessment outcomes.3.6.1 Why surveillance, andhow much is enough?To understand a catchment area “regulardocumented inspections to monitorcatchment conditions and land usechanges” should be undertaken . The veryaction of being seen proactively patrollingthe catchment sends a positive signal tothe land owners that the utility does careabout land management and is interestedin their activities.In conversations with other water andcatchment management authorities andCATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN . ssS . 001 . JUNE2010from the literature, catchment knowledgeis often identified as one of the singlegreatest barriers to waterborne disease.<strong>Catchment</strong> knowledge is vital because theapplication of the risk assessment processis entirely reliant on the understanding ofthe water supply system from catchmentto tap. Inspection of catchments is the keyactivity that will increase an organisation’sknowledge and understanding of itscatchment area.The frequency of surveillance isdependant upon the risk in a catchment.As <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong>’s catchments can bedescribed as partly or fully developed,current best practise is a minimum of 3-5days per week of surveillance.In addition to traditional surveillance,aerial and satellite imagery can also beuseful to detect changes in land use.Satellite imagery especially can be usedto assess changes in land use suchas amount of vegetation clearing or toassess the effects of bushfire.3.6.2 Surveillance currentlyconducted in catchments andbest practice<strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> currently has three full timeRangers who are based in the field andthus are regularly engaged in surveillanceof the catchments. Between these staffthere would be in excess of 5 days spenton informal surveillance.Current best practice surveillance incatchments involves not only monitoringcatchments but also recordingobservations. Specific items to observeare shown in Appendix B. In brief,records should be kept of the following:• General land use activities and landuse changes,• Checking for unusual, unapproved orunlawful activities,• Inspections following incidents (fires,heavy rain, spills),• Proactive management of catchmentsto predict risks and hazards.It is important that this informationis recorded and used in strategicplanning decision making. For this tooccur, a template or simple checklistmust be generated so that surveillancecan be standardised acrosscatchments and time.3.6.3 Recent improvements tosurveillance techniquesAppendix C shows a templatedeveloped within the last year for theWilliamtown RAAF base. It sets out theinspection frequency, what to inspectand the considerations for each site.The aim of developing the template wasto standardise inspections and makethem routine.37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!