12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>those who from the beginning received money from their fellowcitizens for safekeeping knew the obligations they weretaking on, specifically, to guard the tantundem like a good parent,to keep it constantly available to the depositor. This is preciselythe meaning of safekeeping in a deposit contract of afungible good. However, while the legal nature of the irregulardeposit contract is clear <strong>and</strong> easy to underst<strong>and</strong>, humannature is imperfect <strong>and</strong> weak. <strong>The</strong>refore it is comprehensiblethat those receiving monetary deposits were tempted to violatethe safekeeping obligation <strong>and</strong> use for themselves moneythat should have been kept available to others. <strong>The</strong> temptationwas very strong: without depositors realizing it, bankerscould h<strong>and</strong>le large amounts of money; <strong>and</strong> if they used it well,it could generate substantial profit or interest, which bankerscould keep without openly harming anyone. 1 Given the weaknessof human nature <strong>and</strong> the almost irresistible temptationfelt by bankers, it is comprehensible that the traditional principlesof safekeeping on which the monetary irregular-depositcontract is based were violated from the very beginning in aconcealed manner. In addition, given the abstract, confusingnature of monetary relations, most citizens <strong>and</strong> the majority ofauthorities in charge of enforcing moral <strong>and</strong> legal principlesfailed to notice this phenomenon, except in rare instances.And once abuses <strong>and</strong> cases of fraud began to surface <strong>and</strong>became better understood, the institution of banking had1 We are referring to the most obvious source of profit, which initiallymotivated bankers to misappropriate depositors’ money. In chapter 4we will examine a source of much greater earnings: the power ofbankers to issue money or create loans <strong>and</strong> deposits out of nowhere. <strong>The</strong>resulting profit is immensely larger; however, as it arises from anabstract process, it is certain not even bankers were fully aware of ituntil very late in the evolution of finance. Nevertheless, the fact thatthey did not underst<strong>and</strong>, but only intuited, this second type of profitdoes not mean they failed to take advantage of it completely. In chapter4 we will explain how bankers’ violation of traditional legal principlesthrough fractional-reserve banking makes it possible to create loans outof nowhere, the return of which is then dem<strong>and</strong>ed in hard cash (withinterest to boot!). In short, we are dealing with a constant, privilegedsource of funding in the shape of deposits bankers create out of nothing<strong>and</strong> constantly employ for their own uses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!